How platforms solved clinical trials’ disparate data problem | Read now
Our world is drowning in data.?
Humanity generates a staggering 402.74 million terabytes of information every day. From the countless videos we stream to the endless social media scrolling, our global digital footprint is growing exponentially. This data deluge is reshaping industries, influencing our lives, and posing unprecedented challenges.?
Within clinical trials, rapidly evolving technologies are enabling researchers to capture new data points as trials grow more complex. However, this poses new challenges in managing clinical trial data.?
Diverse data sources are on the rise in clinical trials
The clinical trial landscape is experiencing a data revolution.?
According to the Tufts 2020 report, over two-thirds of sponsors are now using or piloting at least four different data sources in their clinical trials, with almost 14% using six. This uptick comes from a diverse pool of data sources, such as eConsent (electronic informed consent) data, eCOA data, mHealth data, smartphone data, eSource data, etc., and reflects the industry's move towards more comprehensive and nuanced data collection.
Leading the charge is non-CRF (case report form) data, with 87.3% of sponsors utilizing this source. This category includes data from specialty labs, biomarkers, and other sources not traditionally captured in standard case report forms. However, the popularity of non-CRF data comes with a caveat: it's also the most common cause of database lock delays, highlighting the complexities of managing diverse data types.
Other data sources gaining traction include:
Interestingly, adoption rates vary by company size. Medium and large sponsors generally show higher adoption rates across these diverse data sources than smaller ones.
The challenge in managing a deluge of data
While this data expansion promises faster, more accurate decision-making during trials, it's not without its challenges. In a 2017 Tufts CSDD report, 98% of respondents reported issues with their current clinical data management systems. As Ken Getz, research associate professor and director at the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, put it:
"Clinical teams are being forced to step out of their comfort zone to manage, integrate, and analyze data from more diverse and less compatible sources, including smartphone and wearable devices, real-world evidence, and social media."
Managing clinical trial data involves various tasks, each with its own challenges. The Tufts CSDD report reveals that while the most time-consuming task is finding, selecting, and implementing a new data vendor, sponsors and CROs spend large amounts of time:?
Notably, small sponsors are more than twice as likely as large sponsors to report transforming and mapping data as extremely time-consuming, indicating that larger organizations may have more robust systems or resources in place for these tasks.
Charting a path forward requires plans and a platform
Simply put, companies are already preparing or need to quickly prepare plans and technologies that enable them to collect, integrate, and analyze real-world patient data from various sources to stay competitive in the coming decade.
Accordingly, the study found that CROs and companies with higher trial volumes (more than 15 per year) are leading the charge in adopting new data sources. As we move forward, the success of clinical trials will increasingly depend on our ability to harness the power of diverse data sources.?
Within the last decade, clinical trial platforms like Medable’s Evidence Generation platform have emerged as powerful tools for handling the complex data landscape of modern clinical research. Their ability to process, display, and analyze large amounts of data from multiple sources makes them indispensable in today's data-driven clinical trials.?
Centralized data collection and integration
Clinical trial platforms serve as centralized hubs for data collection and management. This centralization is crucial for several reasons:
领英推荐
Standardization and normalization
The ability to standardize and normalize data is a crucial strength of clinical trial platforms:
Advanced analytics and visualization
Modern clinical trial platforms come equipped with sophisticated tools for data analysis and visualization:
Scalability and performance
Clinical trial platforms are designed to handle large volumes of data efficiently:
Regulatory compliance and data security
These platforms are built with regulatory requirements in mind:
Collaboration and workflow management
Clinical trial platforms facilitate collaboration among diverse stakeholders:
Interoperability
Modern clinical trial platforms emphasize interoperability:
As trials evolve, data management will be key
As the clinical trial landscape continues to evolve, embracing diverse data sources and advanced technologies is no longer optional—it's imperative.?
As we look to the future, clinical trial success will increasingly depend on our ability to harness the power of diverse data sources effectively. Companies that invest in comprehensive data management strategies and leverage advanced clinical trial platforms will be well-positioned to navigate the complexities of modern clinical research, ultimately accelerating the development of life-changing therapies.
The challenges posed by disparate data systems are significant, but they're not insurmountable. Clinical trial platforms like Medable's offer an easy enterprise-wide solution, providing centralized data integration, standardization, advanced analytics, and robust security features.