How P&G is Helping to Build a Digital Advertising Future that Respects Consumer Privacy, Provides Transparency and Consent
In the last several weeks, there has been much discussion within the advertising industry – and beyond – about Apple’s upcoming software that would give consumers greater control in sharing their personal data with apps and websites owned by other companies. While Apple’s proposed changes alone don’t have a sizeable impact on our ability to reach consumers with relevant information – less than 5 percent of our consent-based consumer data comes from app-to-app sharing – their changes are part of a much wider effort across the industry. Other platforms like Google are developing new ways to create an internet more conducive to consumer privacy, in balance with content consumers want.
And so are we.
Consumers are at the heart of P&G’s brand building. That’s why we are doubling down on transparency, and consent-based consumer data collection, leveraging industry best practices. This is becoming part of the value equation of a trusted brand. We notify consumers about what data we are collecting and how we will use it so that they can make informed decisions about whether to opt-in to our programs, and when they do consent, we provide them with useful information and content from our trusted brands. We do this through multiple consumer touchpoints where we engage with consumers responsibly. And, we enrich consumer data in a clear and transparent way with behavioral and purchase signals to improve analytics, build algorithms, and develop consumer engagement applications that drive growth and efficiency.
But you wouldn’t know any of this by reading recent reporting about our work on this issue through our membership in the advertising association in China.
Here are the facts: P&G – along with 30 others – participated in discussions about developing additional ways to reach Chinese consumers with digital ads. Like all our work in this area, our input prioritized data privacy, transparency and consent for consumers – priorities we have long advocated for as the entire industry modernizes the way it reaches consumers with digital advertising. The principles and standards of this effort were also publicly available, clearly stating that the proposed industry effort – called CAID – can be turned on and off by consumers, protect user data, and not be linked to personal information.
This input isn’t at odds with Apple – who we are also working directly with – or anyone else who shares our values of giving consumers control and transparency.
In fact, this is the exact same approach we are taking in our work with advertising associations in countries around the world – like the Association of National Advertisers in the U.S., Incorporated Society of British Advertisers in Europe, and World Federation of Advertisers worldwide. As one of the world’s largest advertisers, we have a responsibility to do our part in ensuring there are clear rules and standards for consumers, and for companies to operate.
Digital media is dominant and still rising, but after 25 years of cookies and device IDs tracking, people are rightfully wanting more of a say in what data is being collected about them and their behavior, and how it’s used. We’re firmly committed to helping build a world where consumers trust that all media providers and advertisers are responsibly handling their data – and offering ways to better engage people in a way they prefer.
data supply auditor | privacy & ad tech expert | internet threats
3 年If you are in the C-suite in 2021 and still claiming that regular people can provide "consent-based consumer data collection" then you are either obtuse or purposefully deceiving your own consumers. Not once in this piece is there a mention about "respectful defaults" or "data minimization" or anything that would indicate Mr. Pritchard understands why CAID was so disrespectful to Chinese consumers. Furthermore, the CAID standard did not have an ability to turn it on/off - that's the core concept. This piece rewrites history, and wrongly. The CAID standard was both dangerous to people outside China, and people within China, and it was active through an always-on SDK ingestion purposefully architected to ingest specific pieces of user data from the mobile phone when IDFA was not available -- this was not via some consent-based on/off switch and it's disingenuous and downright deceptive to claim now otherwise. When IDFA was unavailable, 2 standards CAID1/CAID2 would use IMEI/network IP address + device/user-agent/operating system fingerprinting and build a permanent user graph controlled by an advertising association that the mobile user had no prior relationship with -- it's a data-coop for an entire country (and also ingests data outside China), a land-grab from online advertising interests in an attempt to side channel both Apple's tracking restrictions, and also the new rights for mobile users that the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) outlined as "app providers cannot deny users basic access to their services even if they decline to share non-essential personal information" (original story on this update @ https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/china-seeks-to-rein-in-mobile-apps-collection-of-personal-data). The team at P&G needs to take a deep look at your data minimization practices, look at the fields of data that your team was strategizing with the CAA to ingest when the IDFA wasn't available, and take a long hard look at how you are conducting partner audits, if you clearly don't have data minimization standards yourself. This letter raises more questions about the data privacy judgement at P&G than the original reporting, and it feels like there isn't a global approach to user data ethics -- instead there is some sort of callous country-by-country effort to squeeze as much consumer data out of devices and people as possible before laws and consumer demands catch up. ;tldr - If a company says they want to give users "control and transparency" over their ads - that's focus group doublespeak - it means nothing and says more about the company trying to still pull the wool over people's eyes in 2021.
AI Search & Product Discovery | Retail eCommerce | Enterprise Account Executive at Constructor
3 年"...after 25 years of cookies and device IDs tracking, people are rightfully wanting more of a say in what data is being collected about them and their behavior, and how it’s used."? On point, as usual. Consumer consented data is the future.
Global Real Estate Advisor & President at 5209 Investments Incorporated - Former Disney and P&G Brand Management
3 年Consumer is boss!!
Vice President at Morgan Stanley
3 年Will this new feature also be controllable via Apple's new ATT prompt?