How Our Alternative Stories Can Make Us Better?

Ever wonder what would have happened if a specific event did not occur? Or how it could have been completely different if we had acted or said something else?

You know situations like this crush we had in our teens. Shy and a bit goofy, we remained silent, taking good care not to reveal our feelings. But even years later, we cannot help but wonder what would have happened if we had opened up?

What if it was reciprocal?

Maybe we would have gone out together.

Maybe we would have started living together.

Maybe … and from a single tweak, we imagine a completely different life.

The French author Albert Camus gives a fascinating definition of life, being the “sum of all your choices”. Obviously, some are better than others, and reflecting on the ones we made is only natural.

When we ponder on what could have been, we engage in a specific thought process called “counterfactual thinking”.

The expert in social psychology and decision making, Dr. Neal Roese, extensively studied this type of thinking.

He explained that when we envisage how things could have been worse, like “I’m so happy to only have my car damaged in this accident. If I was just going a bit faster, I could have been injured”, we perform “downward” counterfactual thinking. This leads to an increased sense of relief1, optimism2, and even gratitude3. In short, it makes us feel better.

On the contrary, when we explore what we could have done better (“upward” counterfactual thinking), like?“if I had studied more for this test, I would have had better grades”, we most often generate guilt, regrets and can end up blaming ourselves?.

So, it could be tempting to avoid this kind of thinking and its associated negative affect, but that would be detrimental to us. In fact, researches proved that “upward” counterfactual thinking is an amazing adaptive mechanism that allows us to understand where we have made a mistake in order to avoid repeating it in the future?.

And one Disney movie, “The Lion King” explains this notion perfectly.

Simba, the heir to the throne, blames himself for the death of his father. He left his native land for years in an attempt to hide and forget his guilt. When finally found by the monkey Rafiki, his wise mentor offers him a life-changing piece of advice.

As Simba opens up, explaining he fears to go back and face his past, the baboon hits him on the head with a stick.

“What was that for?!”?yells the lion. “It doesn’t matter, it’s in the past”, tells the sage.

“But it hurts!” objects Simba, to which Rafiki answers magnificently.

Following these words, the monkey attempts to hit the lion once more, but this time Simba avoids the attack, proving the point that “we can learn from our past” and become better.

Now, knowing what needs to be done but not acting on it doesn’t make us better. Knowing we should study more to get better grades is one part of the process, but if we actually don’t study, this is useless.

Worse, excessive counterfactual thinking can increase worries and keep us in a state of negative affect, with a serious impact on our mental health?.

As a consequence, a key principle when engaging in upward counterfactual thinking is to see it as a scientific experiment.

We observe what was done (or not) and we draw assumptions of what could have been done better. Until tested, we do not have conclusions, just hypotheses.

Hence why there is an absolute need to balance our thinking with actions, to validate our assumptions, turn them into conclusions and grow from our new learnings.

If we do not act, we cannot gain certainty. We remain in a world of “maybe” where we constantly loop on the same thoughts, without getting any closure.

Right after the second attack from Rafiki, the monkey asked Simba: “what are you going to do now?”. Astutely, the fierce lion grabbed the stick to throw it away (to prevent another strike), before running toward his native land. Past his pondering, wiser from his learning, he took action and became the King he was destined to be.

When we balance thinking and doing, we walk the path leading to personal growth.

To discover more on how to conquer overthinking and create clarity, join my free workshop here:?https://lisonmage.com/master-your-life-workshop-ld

Sources:

[1]- Sweeney K. and Vohs K. D., 2012, “On near-misses and completed tasks: the nature of relief”, Psychological Science

[2]- Barnett M. D. and Martinez B., 2015, “Optimists: it could have been worse; pessimists: it could have been better. Dispositional optimism and pessimism and counterfactual thinking”, Personality and Individual Differences

[3]- Walsh N. and Egan S. M., 2018, “Things Could Have Been Worse: The Counterfactual Nature Of Gratitude”, 26th AIAI Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science

[4][5]- Roese N. J., 1994, “The Functional Basis Of Counterfactual Thinking”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

[6]- Epstude K. and Roese N. J., 2008, “The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology