How open-source intelligence pierces the fog of Ukraine’s war

Hello from London.?

When I think back to the start of last year, the burning question then concerned Vladimir Putin. Would he really be so foolish—and aggressive—as to invade Ukraine? Many doubted it, up to the moment when Russian troops poured over the border. But a flood of detailed warnings from Western intelligence agencies, made available for all to see, turned out to be accurate.

We are now in a period of OSINT, or open-source intelligence. (Our article on this, nearly a year ago , referred to Russia’s pre-war manoeuvres serving as a coming-out party for OSINT.) We’ve grown used to seeing footage from battles, sometimes shot by drones, as well as geotagged images filmed by soldiers themselves and then uploaded to social media. Add in satellite and other images, also shared online, and an interested amateur today may have the sort of timely and detailed information from the war that the best equipped generals, spies and political leaders could not have dreamt possible even a few years ago.

What to make of the era of OSINT? Read (and watch) our new report on the topic , and a couple of lessons emerge. The new information does remove some murk and uncertainty from the battlefield. Unwittingly, soldiers with mobile phones and an internet connection have repeatedly helped their enemies to target them more effectively. Yet the fog of war has a way of settling again. One point I’ll take from the past 12 months: so much information gushes from the war zone, alongside carefully crafted propaganda from all sides, that OSINT may deflect and deceive as well as reveal.

The fighting in Ukraine goes on. After weeks of tough fighting it appears that Russian forces managed to take a small eastern town, Soledar, that might be relevant for supplies to a nearby front. Western allies should send more heavy military equipment to support Ukraine . Britain has just said it will send Challenger tanks. Amid expectations that Russia may launch another round of conscription, other countries (notably Germany) will be pressed to send heavy tanks of their own.

Do anniversaries matter? Only as excuses to write stories we’d planned in any case. So indulge us with one: Disney marks its hundredth birthday this year and appears to be in rude health. As we will set out in an article soon, it’s done remarkably well for so long by adapting to evolving media tech—from cinema to video to streaming. We’ll explain what lies behind that success (it’s more than Mickey and Marvel), and unpack reasons why Disney may struggle much harder to flourish in the coming few years.

Elsewhere, my colleagues in the United States have been considering the incomes of Americans, and asking how sluggish gains in the median income might explain worsening political tensions. Read the article we’ve just published on this.

Back in Britain, the woes of the National Health Service are always with us. We wrote recently about the plight of doctors there. But is Britain alone in its suffering? The health services of many rich countries are under strain, and not only (perhaps not mostly) for a lack of money. Have a read of our new analysis of the common challenges that many countries face.

Last, if you’re looking for lighter relief, let me point you to a pair of pieces. One is our brief, and sharp, review of Prince Harry’s memoir . I (genuinely) laughed aloud while reading it. The prince didn’t write his book, at least not alone. So let me also recommend our profile of his ghostwriter, J.R. Moehringer , who has written a few memoirs on behalf of celebrities—they seem to share a theme.

Thanks again for your thoughts about the rest of the year. Sally Ann Moore calls for companies (and others) to do more to boost gender equality, suggesting that 2023 should be the year when companies appoint more women to their boards, and the gender pay gap should decline. David Peduto in Colorado, USA, points out that Turkey also marks its hundredth birthday later this year, after national elections in the summer. He expects Recep Tayyip Erdogan will be set on extending his already long rule. Finally, Steve Thair argues that climate-change denialism is in effect dead because the average person “has seen enough weird weather in 2022” to realise that something serious is afoot. I hope you are right, Steve. Given the storms in California, and a strangely warm winter in Europe, it seems this year is already confirming the trend.

Adam Roberts, Digital editor

Our latest column on workplace culture:

How to unlock creativity in the workplace

Academics do not contend to write the most entertaining research paper of the year. But Yu Tse Heng, now at the University of Virginia, Christopher Barnes of the University of Washington and Kai Chi Yam of the National University of Singapore should take a bow nonetheless. In a study published in 2022, the trio tested the widespread notion that cannabis increases creativity.

Most read by subscribers this week:

• The age of the grandparent has arrived
• The destructive new logic that threatens globalisation
• What to read to understand intelligence and espionage
• Prince Harry’s autobiography is an ill-advised romp
• After a spectacularly chaotic start for Congress, more discord looms

Enjoyed this newsletter?

Read three free articles each month on Economist.com—register for free . If you are not a subscriber, enjoy full access by subscribing here ,

If you subscribe to The Economist, we have good news: there is a new business and technology newsletter just for you. Sign up here .