How much is 'enough'? Technology?
https://pixabay.com/photos/stockcars-racing-bangers-formula-2377783/

How much is 'enough' Technology?

Someone asked me the other day: how much technology the businesses in Launchpad should have? Of course, I gave the correct answer, which is "just enough", which is very unhelpful of me. So, to compensate, how do you know when you have 'just enough technology'?

Sales-led and technology-led businesses

Most businesses I encounter seem to have taken either a 'sales led' or a 'technology led' culture. Neither is wrong in moderation, but are often used to 'excuse' an under- or over-investment in technology.

Businesses that describe themselves as "sales-led" tend towards a focus on speed and resource efficiency over quality. They will pride themselves on having a 'lean-and-mean' technology team, who work fast, cut-corners if needed, and get things in front of the customer quickly. Speed and customer-delivery are absolutely the right things, but taken too far leads to poor quality products, and burnt-out exhausted (or worse-still mistreated) engineering teams. Tiny teams, cutting any-and-every corner to get stuff out for a never-satisfied sales team. This is the extreme of 'too little technology'.

Businesses that describe themselves as "technology-led" tend towards a focus on quality and process efficiency over customer delivery. They pride themselves on building a 'strong platform' that has all the latest ideas and tech in it. Quality and good discipline is vital, but taken too far leads to an introverted focus on building something amazing, rather than delivering value to customers. Sprawling engineering empires, building things of great technical elegance for other sprawling engineering empires... This is the extreme of 'too much technology'.

One way to think about the 'right' amount of technology

So what is 'just enough' technology? A fun way to think about it that I came up with, is being like cars*. Meet, then, the four stereotypes of technical teams:

  • The Old Banger: The old-banger technology team isn't going anywhere fast. Sure it's cheap to run, 'mature' and is still on-the-road despite not having modernised since the 1970s, but even with their foot flat-to-the-floor, they are easily overtaken by, well, everyone.
  • The Boy Racer: This technology team has it all - alloy-inspectability-hubcaps, the latest machine learning seat warmers, and a huge kubernetes cluster in the boot. Rumour is, they even have a quantum computing environment in a lock-up near Epsom. While it may look amazing as it cruises by, it costs a fortune to even start the engine, and those state-of-the-art Spinnaker tyres wear out constantly, and those custom-rolled Istio intakes keep blocking at the worst moments... Far from overtaking everyone else, most people pass them pulled-over on the side of the road explaining to the customer's cybersecurity police why there's no firewall over the air intake.
  • The Family Car: This is what most companies opt for. Boring, reliable, easy-to-maintain, and spacious too. This team gets it done, no drama. They keep-up with the competition. So what's the problem? The problem is that they can only keep-up by keeping their foot somewhere close to the floor :- the flip side of having 'just enough' tech for the day-to-day is that they have little or nothing in reserve... When push-comes-to-shove (and my dear mum used to say), 'just enough' is 'just too little'.
  • The Motorway Car: This is what I think technology product companies should actually aspire too. It's like the family car, but it has just a bit more 'poke' when you need it. If you need to, you have a bit in reserve for those last minute dashes - to pull ahead of a competitor, to get something done for a big customer, to response (heaven fore-fend) to an incident. You can afford to build a solid platform (no bells or whistles, but a good platform), you can afford good hygiene on your processes, and you can afford to keep tech debt under-control so you can burn some when you need it.

So whether you are sales-led, technology-led, or somewhere in the middle, the question isn't "do you have just enough technology for business-as-usual?", the question should be "do you have just enough technology for when business-as-usual goes out the window?"

That's just my perspective, of course, I'd love to hear yours!

*It may be clear from this article that I don't actually know much about cars

**Or indeed 'fun'

Stuart Payne

Talks About - Business Transformation, Organisational Change, Business Efficiency, Sales, Scalability & Growth

3 年

Great post?Tom, thanks for sharing!

Tom Lapperger

COO | NED | Advisor | Climate Tech

4 年

Great way to illustrate a challenge basically every company is confronted with. And very entertaining, too Tom Grey

Tom O'Toole

Product Manager at STRYDE

4 年

The boy racer made me chuckle

Khalid Salama

Software Engineer, Applied Machine Intelligence | Research Fellow

4 年

A very interesting read. It always makes me happy to see that you posted some thing ??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Tom Grey的更多文章

  • Auras, NFTs and the Problem of Scarcity in Digital Assets

    Auras, NFTs and the Problem of Scarcity in Digital Assets

    "Aura" and authenticity in art In "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction", Walter Benjamin writes on…

    2 条评论
  • Readymade Day Dreaming with Stable Diffusion

    Readymade Day Dreaming with Stable Diffusion

    I am very lucky to be able to walk every day and day-dream! As I walk, I sometimes snap photos of things I might use in…

    10 条评论
  • Don't sell propellant instead of payload

    Don't sell propellant instead of payload

    When you are launching a rocket, you generally have two types of things you send up into space - 1) the things you want…

    3 条评论
  • Don't bring me solutions, bring me problems!

    Don't bring me solutions, bring me problems!

    Truth is subjective, it changes with perspective. When I was a new graduate, building my credibility as a…

    9 条评论
  • What is Career Progression now?

    What is Career Progression now?

    Someone was asking me about career progression, and it triggered me to think about what that means nowadays. I was…

    15 条评论
  • Leading in Agile Organisations: Structure

    Leading in Agile Organisations: Structure

    This is second part of my series on things I've learnt leading teams in agile organisations. In the first part, I…

    10 条评论
  • Leading in Agile Organisations: People

    Leading in Agile Organisations: People

    I've been reflecting on the things that I've learnt in my career so far about leading in agile organisations. I started…

    14 条评论
  • Hard and Soft Skills for Solution Architects

    Hard and Soft Skills for Solution Architects

    I was recently asked what I look for when I'm hiring new Solutions Architects and I thought it was interesting enough…

    18 条评论
  • Quantifying opportunities together

    Quantifying opportunities together

    Historically, "qualification" was something that sales people did to prospects. They lined them up, judged where the…

    8 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了