How Much Does Fraud Prevention and Compliance Cost Banks?
Author: Clare Messenger Head of Mobile Intelligence at JT.
The financial sector is on the front lines of the fight against fraud. As online transactions surge and financial technology (fintech) companies disrupt traditional banking models, banks are under increasing pressure to protect their customers from ever-more sophisticated fraudsters. At the same time, a growing web of regulations mandates stricter compliance measures, adding another layer of complexity (and cost) to financial institutions' operations. ?? This article explores the escalating costs of fraud prevention and compliance for banks. We'll delve into the factors driving this rise, including the surge in online fraud, stricter regulations, and the need for enhanced security measures. We'll also explore the impact these costs have on banks and fintech’s, particularly new entrants to the financial services market.
The online fraud threat: a growing monster
The convenience of online banking comes at a price. Fraudsters are constantly innovating, devising new schemes to steal financial data and exploit vulnerabilities in online systems. According to a report by SEON, a fraud prevention company, fraud and anti-money laundering (AML) compliance costs have skyrocketed in recent years, driven by factors like:
These trends underscore the critical role that banks play in safeguarding their customers' financial well-being. But robust fraud prevention measures come at a cost.
?
The regulatory burden: a compliance conundrum?
In addition to the evolving threat landscape, banks are also grappling with a growing body of regulations designed to combat financial crime. These regulations, often introduced by government agencies, aim to protect consumers from fraud and money laundering. While these regulations are essential, they also add a significant compliance burden for banks. ? ? Here are some examples of regulations that impact bank compliance costs:
How regulation is evolving to encourage greater collaboration between industry sectors
As criminals exploit vulnerabilities across different sectors, regulations are increasingly pushing for greater collaboration, recognising that fraud is a complex problem that can't be tackled in silos. The shared responsibility model for tackling Authorised Push Payment fraud is a prime example of this collaborative approach. It acknowledges that multiple parties play a role in facilitating a fraudulent transaction and therefore should share the responsibility for mitigating the harm caused.? Working together, the banking, payments, financial services, telecommunications, and tech industries can create a more secure environment for consumers and businesses alike.
The financial fallout, how much are banks spending??
Quantifying the exact cost of fraud prevention and compliance for banks is challenging. The figures vary depending on the size and complexity of the bank, as well as the specific regulations they are subject to. However, several studies shed light on the significant sums involved.
领英推荐
These figures highlight the immense financial burden that fraud prevention and compliance place on banks. But the impact goes beyond just the bottom line.
Feeling the squeeze: the pressure on banks and fintechs?
The rising costs of fraud prevention and compliance create a squeeze for banks. On the one hand, they must invest in robust security measures to protect their customers and avoid regulatory fines. On the other hand, they need to keep costs in check to remain competitive. This pressure can lead to:?
These consequences underscore the need for a more balanced approach to fraud prevention and compliance. Banks need to find ways to effectively manage risk and meet regulatory requirements without stifling innovation or placing undue burdens on their customers. One area they must be focused on is the long-term impact of new products and services, including fraud strategies they deploy, and how they may impact and facilitate fraud threats of the future. Voice authentication is one such example that has been implemented by banks and other service providers. The rise in audio deep fakes, in the form of voice cloning to impersonate customers and call centre agents threatens the service, and while there are counter solutions already available, the question has to be asked whether investing in it in the first instance makes commercial sense?
Striking a balance: the path forward?
The escalating costs of fraud prevention and compliance are a significant challenge for the financial industry. However, several strategies can help banks navigate this complex landscape:
Conclusion?
The cost of fraud prevention and compliance is a significant and growing expense for banks. The increasing sophistication of online fraud, coupled with stricter regulations, has created a perfect storm for financial institutions. While these costs are substantial, they are a necessary investment in protecting customers and maintaining trust in the financial system and ensuring long-term stability. By embracing technology, greater collaboration, and adopting a risk-based approach, banks can navigate this challenging landscape and strike a balance between security, compliance, and innovation. The future of financial services depends on it.
JT's Mobile Intelligence solutions use the unique datasets from Mobile Network Operators including subscriber and device data and provide it to banks, the financial services and payments sector, and wider economy to detect and stop online fraud and identity crime, and to provide greater assurance to KYC checks. Our services are helping UK high street banks combat Authorised Push Payment fraud, and we provide fraud alerts to over 135 million consumers worldwide.
To find out more visit jtglobal.com/MobileIntelligence
Clare Messenger , and her colleague Jessica Letterman will be at this year's Fraud Leaders' Summit . Do reach out to them to arrange a meeting at the event.
?
?