How to measure "Understand"?
TLRD: The article consists of two parts. Part 1 shared what I did back then. Part 2 shared the conclusion and my application. Feel free to skip to Part 2 if you are in a hurry. :)
1.
A few years ago, while I was in the process of content planning for a workshop on improving presentation skills for university students, I asked a few of them to complete a survey for better insights into their current challenges.
In the survey, I intentionally included a question: "What is your learning objective?" and I still remember myself almost bursting out to tears receiving nine out of ten responses to be: "To understand how to give a great presentation."
Words like "Know," "Understand," and "Effective" are not helpful.
Back in those days, I decided to take more time to conduct 1-on-1 interviews to ask more specific questions, hoping to gain further insights. Some of the questions in the lists were:
Hours of interviews allow me to conclude with two vital insights, later used as learning needs for my workshop:
With the above-mentioned insight, I shaped the 2-hour workshop as below:
Eventually, the workshop received great endorsements from the participants, allowing me to unconsciously know that I somehow identify the right learning need.
2.
Later, when I first began to learn about Learning Design, a respected senior recommended I to read the book "Design How People Learn" by Julie Dirksen. She mentioned that many of her fellows refer to this book as the first go-to one for a Learning Designer.
The book is indeed effortless to read with great examples, visual illustrations, and analogies, providing me an excellent opportunity to reflect on my previous days working instinctively.
One of my favorite sessions, which also provides the answer to the clickbait title is Chapter 3: "What's the goal?"
"A lot of learning projects start with the goal, rather than the problem, but that puts you in the position of solving problems you don’t actually have while failing to address the real issues." (Dirksen).
Indeed, most of the students in my workshop refer to their learning objective as an ambition (most of the time is to become a TedX Speaker), yet fail to state clearly their current problems or gaps.
Along with the statement, Dirksen shared a great framework to help us define an actionable goal, combining Bloom's Taxonomy and Gloria Gery's Competency Taxonomy.
"Understand" in this framework is defined as the ability to comprehend the materials and ideas to either classify, discuss, describe, explain and identify. "Understand" is a higher level than "Remember", which describes the state of recalling information only, and a lower level to "Apply", which describes the ability to execute, implement, use.
The rest of the framework is comprehensive and you can read more here: Bloom, Gloria Gery's Competency Taxonomy.
As for myself, I'm currently applying the frameworks in three ways:
1. Asking learners more pertinent questions to tailor the content and experience, for example:
2. Convincing learners or line managers to select the appropriate learning content.
3. Organize my self-learning management system., for example:
Dirksen's sharing gave me an "Aha moment" and I hope that this useful information may reach one in need. May every one of us have a wondrous day!
_______________________
A PR Note:
Are you a Vietnamese Learning Designer wannabe? Or an Edtech enthusiast?
Join our community - Vietnam Learning Design Group to network, learn and share your journey and interest with us, as we are all learners and teachers at the same time. ;)
Instructional Designer | ELL Instructor | Assessment Editor
3 年Right. We can see this in the 5 levels of difficulty YouTube videos. I also like to use the Blooms Taxonomy X Depth of Knowledge Chart. https://youtu.be/fOGdb1CTu5c https://www.synergiseducation.com/blooms-taxonomy-and-webbs-depth-of-knowledge/
Co-Founder @PsyCancer Talk | Psych @Korea Univ
3 年Thank you for the insightful sharing! It made me think more about my learning prioritization as well ??