HOW TO KILL A CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Errol Braithwaite
MANAGEMENT CONSULTING & PROJECT DEVELOPMENT | INFRASTRUCTURE | MINING | CONSTRUCTION
The modern contractual environment is usually extremely disadvantageous to the Contractor. Most tenders require bidders to simultaneously:
The Contractor must swallow all of this on the back of paper-thin margins as well as all the normal contracting risks like fuel and materials prices, industrial action, the weather, local content requirements and so on and so on.
Frankly, it’s nuts.
Taken together, these circumstances effectively mean that Contractors are required to provide unsecured credit to the Employer who can then pull the Performance Bond (seize the Contractor’s money) at any time without following a dispute process, and hold the Contractor liable for unlimited costs, now and in the future, for any default that can be ascribed to the Contractor.
It’s a crazy set of risks which no Contractor who wishes to stay in business should blindly agree to. I call it SATAN’S TRIANGLE OF CONTRACTING because so many of them, big and small, have been swallowed up by it, never to be seen again:
So, what can you as a Contractor do to protect yourself?
Here are a few thoughts…
1.????GET A PAYMENT BANK GUARANTEE
Always request a Payment Bank Guarantee from the Employer for the full contract value. This should be a mandatory requirement if any one of the following is true:
Projects where you are required to waive the Contractor’s Lien AND the Employer requires an On-Demand Performance Bond AND the Employer refuses to agree to keep you cash positive should be considered HIGH RISK. This is even more serious if the project is of a short duration. Any deviation from the requirement for a Payment Bank Guarantee under these circumstances must be approved in writing by the chairperson of your Risk Committee (who would have to be very brave). Alternatively, walk away and live another day!
2.????LIMIT YOUR LIABILITY
领英推荐
3.????QUALIFY PERFORMANCE BONDS
Many Employers want an “On Demand” performance bond. This will typically include wording to the effect: ”The Guarantor [Contractor] will pay on demand, without regard to any claim or dispute of any nature which any party may allege and without verifying:
?Effectively wording like this puts the Employer in a position where he can take money from you even if he is contractually in default. For example, if you stop work for his non-payment, you run the real risk that the Employer will successfully demand the bond. So,
4.????MINIMISE PAYMENT RETENTIONS
Most Employers want to hold back a portion of every invoice that you submit. Typically, this is 5%, or even up to 10% of the invoice value. Their rationale is that this retention can be used to ensure that you rectify any defects at the end of the project. Fair enough. But of-course some Employers are never satisfied. They deliberately and unreasonably find every reason not to release the retention because they know that you are very unlikely to sue them for it. They know that they can drag out a payment dispute for years. And so they bet on you preferring to negotiate a "settlement" which involves you settling for a reduced payout and them getting another layer of cash straight to their bottom line. It's a game many clients like to play.
?5.????GET CREDIT INSURANCE
You should develop and implement a credit insurance policy which ALL projects must comply with:
For example, if the project will ever be in a position where you are owed (you fill in the appropriate numbers on the dots):
If no credit check is available or no credit insurance can be procured, then you should insist on upfront payments or a payment guarantee. No exceptions.
Strategist, Chief Customer Officer & Rainmaker
1 年Spot on Errol, great article not to mention the famous and now very popular termination for convenience clause !
Senior Contracts Manager at Franki Africa
1 年Well written article Errol! this is the reality that contractors are faced with every day of our lives. another aggravating circumstance is the attitude of professional teams that tend to side with the Client. they need to remember their impartiality on all projects - fairness to the Client and the Contractors!
Engineering & Construction Arbitrator Adjudicator
1 年Contractors have been dealing with these issues for decades. Nothing new here. Construction companies die at the hands of unethical people when change occurs on projects. Psychopaths and change are a deadly cocktail
Entrepreneur & Engineer | Networking with Innovators in Technology & Business | Passionate About Software, Motorsports, and Efficient Business Solutions
1 年Great article, and sadly true. The comments are on point.
BuildSmart Consultant | Management Consultant | Chartered Global Management Accountant | Chartered Accountant (Zimbabwe)
1 年Brilliant