How Judges Decide Cases

Modern scientific thinking on drawing bias judgment, mostly such judgment are based on sentimental values. You read from what was not reason during the exact trial but you formulated from in between. He was one with him when it all happened but I wouldn't take away that prior they were saw arguing and later he left alone. Then prime suspect with an alibi. Then connect him to the hit. We should consider his underworld network. A conservation over the phone. It is far fetched but it is a lead to follow. If the crown in this case never had cross examination on the heads of argument but it doesn't deny the honorable from concluding as bias scientific thinking from Jacob Zuma spy tapes 'who exactly is the man in the end of the line is Senior crown counsel Bulelani Ngcuka is talking about (the big man in Luthuli house) Thus what constitutes sentimental judgment, our honorable judge Charkason ruled in favour of Jacob Zuma on sentimental scientific thinking than testimony based on cross examination on the body of witness. Mostly such cases all argued in America, our judge was critic as while hold high in certain circumstances in legal fraternity. As usual good thought provoking friendo and confidante Loius Podbielski. We have a case come 8 June 2018, whose signature appears on 19 January 2001

The conference was a humbling experience . . . learning how much I do not know and still have to learn.

I enjoyed the conference, thank you! A lot of thoughts to consider.