How intranet in-a-box products maximise the value of SharePoint
There’s a scene in Monty Python’s Life of Brian where a group of protestors are discussing how terrible the Romans are, and then start to list the wide variety of benefits that they have brought, including bringing in drinking water, safer streets and more. And it’s funny, as the rebels realise but refuse to acknowledge that the Romans have introduced many things they are thankful for.
The ring of “What have the Romans ever done for us” reminds me a little of those organisations that choose to implement a complex, enterprise-wide intranet using just SharePoint Online out of the box without fully considering the value that an intranet software product and vendor can bring. As my colleague Chris Tubb points out in his recent post on "The hidden costs of a free intranet: what you should know" when as Spark Trajectory we help clients to select the right intranet product, SharePoint Online invariably comes last or nearly last when pegged against established products in considering the full requirements of the client. Product requirements are individual and unique to each client, but the inability of SharePoint to fully meet them is relatively consistent. To at least not consider the value an intranet product can bring, is a little like saying "What have the intranet vendors ever done for us".
The temptation of SharePoint
We fully understand why just using SharePoint Online for an intranet is an attractive proposition and often strongly advocated by IT functions: the reduced costs; maximising the investment in Microsoft 365; a quicker route to launch day without the need to procure a new solution with less up-front effort and hassle.
However, you also really need to know what you’re doing to implement it. And if you want your intranet to do everything it needs to do and work how you intend it to from day one, you may need to be prepared to:
The combination of these things is going to place a dent in the costs and value associated with just going with SharePoint alone. ?
But the more canny intranet software vendors have been around in the market for a long time and to date they’ve been able to navigate the challenge from Microsoft’s move to support SharePoint as a viable independent intranet solution. The reason they have been able to do this is by continuing to deliver value in a number of different ways.
领英推荐
What the intranet vendors have actually done for us
The intranet vendors tend to offer value – and continue to offer value – ?in a number of distinct areas:
Intranet products save you time and provide a better experience
SharePoint Online is a viable option for your next intranet but it comes with challenges. An intranet product and its vendor are keen for your business, and Microsoft’s continuing evolution of SharePoint has kept the industry on its toes. A product isn’t the only option and yes, it comes at initially more cost, but it’s often the way to meet your full requirement list, have access to more features, and drive more sustainable intranet content and communications. ?
Spark Trajectory is an intranet and digital workspace consultancy, working with innovative models to help you deliver your project like a pro. We provide services in this area such as Content Strategy, Intranet Product Evaluations, our Intranet Governance Accelerator and our Intranet Launch Accelerator. Do say Hi, sign up to our newsletter or arrange a time to speak with us.
Very good points Steve. As you said many "nice to haves" do add up but we also find that enhanced governance, a solid, underpinning information architecture and the ability to easily enrich content are becoming hugely important, especially as firms need to start getting ready for AI. Some of the best OOTB products provide just that.
Products and Services Director at Advania UK and Microsoft MVP
1 年Good points made here. I think there’s something about the marginal gains you mention in particular - if the right product is just 5% better (than native) across branding, analytics, content governance, targeting/personalisation etc., the cumulative effect is significant. The resulting intranet is far richer and easier to manage, even if there isn’t one killer feature.
Award winning digital workplace leader
1 年Sage words Steve. With IT still holding the purse strings it’s very difficult to move past ‘their needs’. For me, this is why it’s so important to start the journey to platform selection before even thinking about technical options. If you can involve IT leaders in the process of developing the strategic employee experience objectives (why the platforms and channels are needed) then the mountain of insights will eventually prove why a particular approach is best. Having just moved from an in a box superb solution to a native (albeit alpha) SP site, I can honestly now say with some credibility that native is fu**ing awful and stressful to administer unless you’ve massively deep pockets.