How the human rights law applies on UK immigration applications
A person's human rights are the fundamental rights and moral freedoms of every human being, from birth to death. Human Rights is a convention on protecting the Human Rights and fundamental freedoms of a person. So, how is that connected to UK immigration applications?
Well, the European Convention on Human Rights is an international policy on protecting human rights and political freedom in Europe. The European Convention on Human Rights was enacted in 1950 by the then newly formed Council of Europe and came into force on 3 September 1953.
The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) primarily protects the human rights of citizens of European council countries. All member states of the Council, including the UK, have signed the Convention.
Human Rights Laws to respect for private life and family life
In almost all UK immigration application is likely to draw the protection of the Human Rights Laws. You have the right to live privately without government intervention. In some cases, however, public authorities may need to help you to enjoy your rights, including your ability to participate in society in your private life. Privacy means preventing the media and others from interfering in your life. Private life also means that personal information about you is kept safe and cannot be shared anywhere without your permission, except in particular circumstances.
Family life may include the relationship between a married or unmarried couple, an adopted child and adoptive parents, and foster parents and adopted child. According to human rights policy, you have the special right to enjoy family relationships without government intervention. This includes the right to live with your family and the right to regular contact where this is not possible.
The critical reason for human rights is that no one should be abused or discriminated against, and everyone should have the opportunity to develop their talents. Unfortunately, many people in the world do not have these basic rights and freedoms, and many people are deprived of their basic rights.
Everyone has the right to respect his personal and family life (his home and his family members). There shall be no interference by any public authority in exercising this right, as required by law and for a democratic society in the interests of national democracy, public security, or the country's economic welfare. There will be no change in the law to prevent chaos or crime, protect health or morals, or protect the rights and freedoms of others.
The Immigration Rules have been changed since 9 July 2012, whereby when any claim that draws the attention of the European Convention on European Human Rights (ECHR), the Home Office are obligated to make a consideration. Further guidances have been published to address interpretations and wrongful considerations.
Applicants are likely to be successful outside the Immigration Rules due to the failure of?Article 8 ECHR claims under the Immigration Rules and the exceptionally sympathetic circumstances surrounding the human rights appeal.
Prohibition of torture
Article 3 states that no one will be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.?Unusually, there is no sanctioned exception or qualification in the provisions of the Convention, and the court has included nothing. This does not mean the public interest, the rights of others, or the victims' actions.
How does Article 3 ECHR play towards an immigration application? Well, torture is a common case for the helpless people, but torture prohibited in a variety of situations. As a result, special care needs to be taken to avoid infringement of articles by the police and others responsible for detainees (prison officers, immigration officers, detention centers, and safe mental units). In addition, it is wise to initially assess the risk of unhealthy behavior, especially for vulnerable groups (suspicious children, minority groups, etc.).
Torture is defined as intentional inhumane treatment that results in severe and brutal suffering. The level of torture is the main difference between torture and inhuman behavior, but it must also be intentional, for example, leaking information or intimidating. According to the NB, it can save the lives of innocent people, and it does not support oppression. Examples of acts of torture found by a court include rape, blindfolding, threatening to harm a family, and the death penalty. It gives mental and physical pain. The extent of torture is increasing. As standards increase, the kind of punishment that was not considered torture 30 years ago can happen now.
领英推荐
To answer the above question, in all medical based applications, both the Home Office and the Tribunals including the Courts, must consider whether the threshold with the help of medical based appeal cases are considered.
The reported and starred case law of the Grand Chamber in?N v United Kingdom?(Application no.?26565/05) confirmed the judgment of the House of Lords in?N v Secretary of State for the Home Department?[2005] UKHL 31?which remains binding precedent.?
Restrictions to this right?
Human rights provide the right to respect to the private or personal life and family life, one's home, and correspondence, which is subjected to certain restrictions under the Human Rights Laws.
There are situations when public authorities may interfere with someone's right to respect their personal and family life, home, and correspondence. It is approved only when the authority can show that its work is legitimate, necessary due to:
Positive obligations
According to Article 3 ECHR. The obligation to prevent medical reversal is largely a function of the government in enacting laws and regulations. But it can also arise at the work level, for example, where social workers fail to take reasonable steps to protect children from severe and long-term parental neglect, of which they were aware.
Where vulnerable groups like children, restless-minded people, or prisoners are concerned, and where the state's obligation to prevent bad behavior is strengthened.
Conclusion
Positive obligation broadly speaking, the obligation to do something to ensure the respect and protection of human rights. Negative obligations refer to a duty that does not work, refraining from doing something that interferes with or goes against human rights.
ICS Legal have been helping clients since 2006, we as a firm have both knowledge and experience, dealing with all types of immigration matters including human rights appeals. We pride ourselves on our client-centric focus and always work on the best interest of our clients.
You can reach us on 0207 237 3388 or email us your enquiry to [email protected]. Stay connected with us both here or on Twitter - ICS Legal12.