How have the terms of English commercial leases evolved in recent years?

How have the terms of English commercial leases evolved in recent years?

I'm showing my age here, but I've been reflecting lately on how much leases and the clauses therein have changed in the 30 years since I began my career as a management surveyor. In my opinion, the structure and layout have improved, but it is also worth noting how clauses to limit tenants' exposure are becoming more common, and occupiers appear to be in a much better position to negotiate to their advantage.

Obviously, my opinions are based on my personal experience and do not represent the views of the entire property sector. I do not claim to be a property market analyst, but I believe I have seen enough documentation to offer an opinion. I would also emphasise that the documents I address are at the sharper end of the property world; smaller mixed-use buildings, secondary shopping centres, and single occupancy tenants, as opposed to prime institutional lettings, where the picture may be similar but on a different scale.


Term

I remember at my first job after leaving university hearing two senior partners commenting that they were getting old. They had agreed on a lease for a term of 25 years, and it was finally coming to an end. For the leases I look at today, a 10-year term is unusual in its length, 3 to 5 years are much more common. The only ones where longer terms seem to be used are where there is a large capital outlay at the start of the lease.

Outside 1954 Act

Probably as a reflection of the reduction in term, I am seeing a large proportion of the leases I look at are contracted outside of the 1954 Act. It does make me wonder that whilst The Act, and its subsequent amendments, is still a cornerstone of landlord and tenant relations whether it is losing its previously won regal status. It seems landlords and tenants no longer feel the need for its protection. Mind you she is almost 70 years old.

Rent Free

Frankly, if a lease I have read recently doesn’t have a rent-free in it, either one of the parties didn’t ask, or the other was in such a strong position they said no and there was no comeback. With smaller rents, one to three months at the start of the lease is common. For larger rents on a longer term, a rent-free of 6 months to a year is not unknown. Leases also seem to contain more stepped rents and ones that are indexed linked. I do fear for those on the latter as we see inflation rising.

Breaks

Mid-term and even multiple mid-term breaks are becoming the norm in more and more leases I am looking at. The breaks are also being linked, either to an additional rent-free or, which sometimes surprises me, a financial penalty paid to the landlord if the tenant initiates the action. What’s becoming apparent is that breaks are being utilized in leases with relatively short terms and are almost mainstream in ‘long’ terms which I have already commented may be no more than ten years.

Service Charge Caps

I think occupiers are becoming savvier when they deal with the issue of service charges. With all due respect to landlords and their agents, I think they monitor budgets closely to give value for money and good services to occupiers

In the past, a cap was normally reserved for a big, known capital event that the tenant had been made aware of during their pre-contract enquiries. This may be a planned external redecoration or refurbishment project and the cap was limiting the tenants' exposure specifically to that. More often I am seeing the cap now applies to the overall annual service charge spend and it being reviewed annually on an indexed basis.?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Giles Musson的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了