How Not to Have a Sean Spicer Moment

How Not to Have a Sean Spicer Moment

As a communications coach, I’m constantly urging our clients to make use of one of the most effective public-speaking tools out there: the well-crafted analogy. Notice I said “well-crafted?” That’s because an analogy is like a loaded grenade in your hand. If you don’t know how to handle it, it can maim. (how meta is that, to issue a warning about analogies by making one?)


Sean Spicer discovered this the hard way when, in front of the entire White House Press corps, he broke a rule that’s in every public speaking 101 handbook: Don’t compare anyone to Hitler or anything to Nazi Germany. There is zero upside to this, in fact, it’s like jumping with both feet on a land mine. The resulting Ka-Boom from his mind-boggling miscalculation could be heard way beyond the press room full of slack-jawed reporters. It reverberated far and wide, resulting in a truly rare occurrence: a member of the White House appearing on CNN to issue an apology. 


Analogies do not work when you’re discussing matters of life and death. Assad’s heinous acts are so atrocious that they need no comparison. The sheer inhumanity of them, and the horrifying images of the death and suffering they caused, speak for themselves. To compare one act of genocide against another in an attempt to weigh them on some kind of atrocity scale is unthinkable. Spicer should have known that.


When used properly, analogies are effective because they allow you to help an audience better understand a concept that perhaps is unfamiliar by comparing it to one that is common and familiar to their experience. Colin Powell, the former Secretary of State, is the author of one of the greatest of all time. When asked for his opinion on whether the United States should invade Iraq he said, “this is the Pottery Barn Principle – if you break it,  you own it.”  The geo-political ramifications of regime change probably isn’t something in which the average person is well versed. But knocking over a breakable in a store is an experience we all get.


But when you compare merely an unfortunate mishap to an incident where there was loss of life, only bad things can happen. After the 2010 political debate in which Rick Perry forgot the third federal agency he would abolish, a former aide to George Bush called the gaffe, “the human equivalent of the Shuttle Challenger.” That kind of ludicrous comparison dishonors those who intrepid explorers who lost their lives. 


But if you are going to roll the dice and share a provocative comparison, at least get your facts right, something Spicer failed to do. Spicer insinuated that Assad is worse than Hitler because he gassed his own people. Many Jews who were German were among the millions exterminated in the Nazi gas chambers, which were the chemical weapons of that era. 


Analogies are a concise and effective tool to make your point resonate with an audience, but unless you are looking to have your own Sean Spicer Moment, handle them with extreme care.

Mathieu Vidal

Spécialiste Communications et Affaires publiques

7 年

I just miss Sean Spicer so mutch... Is there any way he could get is job back?

Geoffrey Forrest

Director of New Projects and Sponsoring at OnSite: MEDIA

7 年

One of my favorite quotes on speaking: "Speaking without thinking is like shooting without aiming."

Geoffrey Forrest

Director of New Projects and Sponsoring at OnSite: MEDIA

7 年

Also, I never call anyone an "Idiot", even idiots. I say, It is, "idiotic".

回复
Bill Rock

New York, National Broadcaster & President of Bill Rock Productions

7 年

Your post has merit, but you’ve only made an example of one person, albeit an important example. Aside from Mr. Spicer’s “moment”, the invocation of the “H” word has been uttered on public platforms, including in broadcasting, significantly over the recent past by both high profile individuals as well as lesser knowns. The only difference is more often than not it’s been attributed to the President and uttered by those who loath him. In today's explosive political climate, focusing on one side and not including other specific "Hitler" examples greatly diminishes your point to sounding like biased rhetoric. Judging by your impressive credentials it would appear that you do not have a political axe to grind and there was no intentional political agenda being served. However, as you know, trying to instruct others on “what not to do” should be balanced. BTW I am and have been an independent for half a century and believe that fairness and unbiased truth is a goal to which all broadcasters and public speakers should aspire unless they are identified as intentionally promoting a specific political cause. I do NOT consider political sensitivity and political correctness the same.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Bill McGowan的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了