How to Foster open communication in the boardroom

Introduction

Open communication in the boardroom is a critical factor for effective governance and strategic decision-making. It fosters an environment where diverse perspectives can be shared, leading to more innovative solutions and enhanced organizational performance. Scholars such as Edgar H. Schein, Amy Edmondson, Kim Scott, Adam Grant, and Marcial Losada have extensively studied the dynamics of communication within organizations, emphasizing the need for psychological safety, constructive feedback, and a culture of openness. Their research provides a framework for understanding how to cultivate an environment conductive to open dialogue among board members.

Best Techniques for Effective Team Communication

1. Psychological Safety: Creating an environment where team members feel comfortable sharing ideas without fear of judgment or reprisal.

? Exercise: “Mistakes Celebration” – Team members share a mistake they made and what they learned from it. This reinforces that mistakes are part of growth and encourages open dialogue.

2. Active Listening and Empathy: Training team members to listen actively and empathetically to foster understanding and show genuine interest in each other’s contributions.

? Exercise: “Reflect and Clarify” – In pairs, one person shares a thought while the other reflects back what they heard. The speaker clarifies if necessary. This builds listening skills and reduces miscommunication.

3. Clear Role and Goal Alignment: Ensuring that every team member understands their role and the goals of the group. This creates a common language and purpose, improving communication.

? Exercise: “Goal Mapping” – Team members map out how their personal goals align with team objectives, promoting transparency and collaboration.

?

Encouraging Feedback, Feedforward, and Dialogue in Executive Board Teams?

1. Feedback - Example: Regular “Check-in” Sessions – Many successful boards conduct monthly or quarterly check-ins where each member provides structured feedback. This practice helps normalize feedback as part of the board’s culture, making it a tool for growth rather than criticism.

2. Feedforward - Example: Future-focused Planning Meetings – Instead of only looking back at past performance, some boards have adopted “feedforward” sessions where members propose constructive suggestions focused on upcoming projects or challenges. This keeps discussions oriented toward solutions and future possibilities.

3. Dialogue - Example: Rotating “Hot Seat” Sessions – A practice where one board member takes the “hot seat” to present a key issue or challenge, prompting an open dialogue around it. This practice keeps open communication active, allowing for fresh ideas and diverse perspectives in board discussions.

?

In conclusion, fostering open communication in the boardroom is a multifaceted endeavor that requires the implementation of effective techniques and exercises. By promoting active listening, clarity, open-ended questioning, and constructive feedback, organizations can create an environment conducive to open dialogue. Encouraging feedback, feedforward, and structured dialogue further enhances this culture, leading to improved decision-making and organizational performance. By incorporating these strategies and practices, executive teams can maintain a culture of transparency and adaptability, keeping lines of communication open and fostering continuous growth.

?

?References:

(2022). Fostering a just culture in healthcare organizations: experiences in practice. bmc health services research, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08418-z

(2023). Hyperloop transportation technologies: practices for open organizing across vuca contexts. journal of organization design, 12(3), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-023-00141-1

(2018). Open strategy-making with crowds and communities: comparing wikimedia and creative commons. long range planning, 51(4), 561-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.08.005

(2018). Strengthening the tie: creating exchange relationships that encourage employee advocacy as an organizational citizenship behavior. management communication quarterly, 32(4), 593-611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918783612

(2023). Symmetrical internal communication and the performance of hotel employees: an assessment of the mediating role played by identification with the organization.. https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v3i2.437

(2021). Tracing the adoption and effects of open science in communication research*. journal of communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab030

(2021). How to make health and risk communication on social media more “social” during covid-19. risk management and healthcare policy, Volume 14, 3523-3540. https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s317517

(2022). The moderating effect of communication on congruence and incongruence of openness to change: is communication always beneficial for learning organization culture and knowledge sharing?. the learning organization, 29(2), 172-190. https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-02-2021-0025

(2018). Exploring relationship between online connectedness and employee perception of supervisor openness. archives of business research, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.611.5212

(2019). The importance of communicating change. corporate communications an international journal, 24(4), 670-685. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-04-2019-0039

(2021). Effectiveness of principals interpersonal communication: a literature review. international journal of research and innovation in social science, 05(05), 298-303. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2021.5515

(2021). Determinants of employees’ openness to change: insights from service and manufacturing sectors of pakistan. sustainable business and society in emerging economies, 3(4), 497-508. https://doi.org/10.26710/sbsee.v3i4.2023

(2021). Impact of transformational leadership and transparent communication on employee openness to change: mediating role of employee organization trust and moderated role of change-related self-efficacy. leadership & organization development journal, 43(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-08-2020-0355

(2019). Team communication in the workplace., 28-40. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429196881-3

(2019). Team communication on tasks performed in blood pressure clinics in community pharmacies. journal of pharmacy technology, 36(1), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755122519872697

(2023). The linkage between team communication, team motivation and search and rescue team performance. sa journal of human resource management, 21. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v21i0.2217

(2023). Untitled. zeszyty naukowe politechniki cz?stochowskiej zarz?dzanie, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.17512/znpcz.2023.3

(2018). A theory of openness for software engineering tools in software organizations. information and software technology, 97, 26-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.12.008

(2019). Exploring the puzzle of civility: whether and when team civil communication influences team members’ role performance. human relations, 73(2), 215-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719830164

(2019). Augmented reality as a tool for open science platform by research collaboration in virtual teams. осв?тн?й вим?р, 1, 147-158. https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.v53i1.3838

(2018). Collaborative organizational forms: on communities, crowds, and new hybrids. journal of organization design, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-018-0036-3

(2023). Eleven strategies for making reproducible research and open science training the norm at research institutions.. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/kcvra

(2019). An experimental vignette study on the attractiveness of ownership-based carsharing communities: a social capital theory perspective. environment and behavior, 53(4), 379-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916519888969

(2021). Why openness makes research infrastructure resilient. learned publishing, 34(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1361

(2019). Transformational leadership and team performance: the role of innovation in indonesia property agent industry.. https://doi.org/10.2991/iconies-18.2019.67

(2018). Organizing for openness: six models for developer involvement in hybrid oss projects. journal of internet services and applications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-018-0088-1

(2018). Diversity, productivity, and growth of open source developer communities.. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1809.03725

(2020). Preliminary analysis of covid-19 academic information patterns: a call for open science in the times of closed borders.. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202003.0443.v2

(2018). Sharing community data: platform collectivism for managing water quality., 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92022-1_6

(2023). Open multi-organ communication device for easy interrogation of tissue slices. lab on a chip, 23(13), 3034-3049. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3lc00115f

(2022). The chinese open science network (cosn): building an open science community from scratch.. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ac9by

(2019). Community self-organizing and the urban food commons in berlin and new york. sustainability, 11(13), 3641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133641

(2021). First person – maria losada-perez. disease models & mechanisms, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.049067

(2020). Ocular bacterial signatures of exophthalmic disease in farmed turbot ( scophthalmus maximus ). aquaculture research, 51(6), 2303-2313. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.14574

(2022). Depth-related patterns in microbial community responses to complex organic matter in the western north atlantic ocean. biogeosciences, 19(24), 5617-5631. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5617-2022