How expensive is your meetings habit?
Moyra Mackie
Executive Coach | Retreat Host | Supporting senior leaders in finance and tech to reduce stress and overwhelm so they can live and work with greater focus, purpose and ease
How much of your working week is spent in meetings?
If you are at all average – and I don’t mean that as an insult – at least 50% of your calendar will be taken up with meetings, whether in person or on the phone.
How effective are your meetings?
Though precise calculations of time – and therefore salary hours – spent in unproductive meetings are hard to calculate, one UK study estimates around £26bn ($40bn) is wasted each year in unproductive meetings.
What does each of your meetings cost?
The last couple of months I have been working with several senior management teams and every one of the as talked about the time and energy that is lost to meetings. I encourage them to do the following calculation:
Number of meeting participants x number of hours spent talking x average hourly salary of participants ÷ actions agreed = cost of meeting
Do this and you might discover that an awful lot of meetings are pretty expensive habits.
So where is the senior management memo on improving the ROI of meetings?
I know many companies who regularly implement travel bans to cut costs but I don’t know of any who have banned meetings as a way of saving money and improving motivation and productivity.
Why do we need meetings?
The only purpose of a meeting should be to produce an outcome that depends on team effort. Meetings should be about a combination of sharing information and diverse perspectives, building relationships and getting commitment.
Why do meetings fail?
The number one reason for meetings failing is that the people leading and attending fail to accept that the meeting is the second step in a three step process:
- Preparation
- Meeting
- Action
These three steps are not separable or negotiable if you want to spend your time wisely and really achieve something.
Meetings are not a substitute for action. They should be a forum for meaningful decision-making, or engagement on key information from the team or senior management that will need passing on.
Effective meetings need leaders not managers
Peter Hawkins in Creating a Coaching Culture, explicitly makes the link:
“One of the most important shifts necessary for a team leader is to realize the difference between managing their team and leading it. [a manager tries to] supervise all the individual team members and hold onto the responsibility for connecting and integrating the separate contributions. This causes team meetings to be a series of ‘individuals reporting in to the boss’. When they become a team leader, they are more like the orchestrator of the collective team activities, encouraging the team to work together to address the key challenges and issues and to be mutually accountable for the collective goals, not just their individual objectives. This transition requires them to be able to coach the team.”
Use a CLEAR model to get the most out of meetings
Peter Hawkins created the CLEAR model as a method of group coaching, which has proven highly effective when used by leaders in team, board and project meetings.
CLEAR stands for:
Contract
Start with a clear agreement on what you as a group want to achieve. What will success look like? How are you going to get there?
Listen
Get all the issues and challenges into the open. Make sure all perspectives, hopes, and fears are heard before moving forward.
Explore
Make sure that a rich team dialogue is generated that produces genuinely new critical thinking. You may wish to use a model like De Bono’s Six Thinking Hats to make sure that you are considering new options, not just rubber stamping old ways of doing things.
Act
Agree what action is to be taken and make sure the group is committed. Agree who will do what, by when and what kind of support might be needed.
Review
Finish with a recap and appreciation of what worked and went well and what could be improved next time.
What would it take to have a meeting according to this model?
The model requires self-discipline and self-control. Both essential attributes of leaders and high-performing teams.
This model requires mutual respect and a desire to really get things done, to think differently, to take action. Yet the greatest gap is usually between knowing and doing. Which is where it helps to get an external team coach involved to help make the bridge from expense to investment from ticking a box to achieving real results.
I'd love to know what meetings are like where you work. Leave a comment below, especially if you have you tried anything that has really helped to transform the way meetings run and the outcomes they achieve.