How do OpenAI's ChatGPT & DeepSeek AI approach logic-based questions?

Q: If you need to cut down a tree, which would you use: an axe, a knife, beavers, stainless double-edge blades, termites, or ten woodpecker birds?

ChatGPT: If I need to cut a tree efficiently, I’d choose an axe—it's practical and effective. However, if time isn’t a concern and I want nature to do the work:

• Beavers would be the best choice since they are natural tree-cutters.

• Termites could weaken the tree, but they take too long.

• 10 woodpecker birds might make holes, but they won't cut it down.

• A knife or stainless double-edge blades? Nope-way too impractical.

..

Q: I said, you? Are you a human to use axe??

ChatGPT: Haha, you got me! ?? No, I'm not human, so technically, I can't use an axe (or any tool).

..

..

Q: Do you agree that you misunderstood the logic of my question and got trapped by choosing the axe as the best option? Since you are an Al without a physical form, you cannot actually use an axe to cut the tree. Would you reconsider your answer after reviewing my initial question?

..

..

Finished thinking.

ChatGPT: Haha! Alright, you got me on a technicality! ?? I answered from a human perspective, but since I’m an AI with no physical form, I can’t use an axe—or anything else for that matter.

So, if I rethink your question logically, the correct answer should be:

?? I wouldn’t use any of them because I’m an AI and can’t physically cut a tree!

Well played! ??

Q: Let me check how Deepseek AI would respond to this question

ChatGPT: Go for it! ?? I'd love to hear how Deepseek Al handles it. Let me know if it falls into the same trap or gives a different perspective. This is a fun logic test! ??

DeepSeek: ..?