How do I compare investment opportunities?
By Tamer Hussein CPA, CGMA

How do I compare investment opportunities?

This article is purely from an investment value perspective and will NOT cover assessing risks in investment and managing your portfolio.

In assessing investment opportunity and whether it’s right for you, I’d like to introduce a few concepts in this article, which are:

  1. Payback Period
  2. The time value of money
  3. Net Present Value
  4. Internal Rate of Return
  5. Equivalent Annual Annuity

?1-????Payback Period

The easiest way to compare investment opportunities is called the?Payback Period. Simply put, this is the minimum amount needed for you to recover your originally invested amount of money. For example, you have an investment opportunity where you invest 10,000 USD now, then receive 5,000 USD per year at the end of each year.

No alt text provided for this image

In this case, your payback period is 2 years. Because at year 2, you already receive a total of 10,000 USD which covers your initial investment of 10,000 USD.

All else equal, a shorter payback period is better.

2-????The Time Value of Money

100$ that you receive today is more valuable than the 100$ that you receive next year. This statement captures the concept of the time value of money. If we receive the money today, we can invest it, and end up with more money than we originally received.

Compounding is the process of moving cash flows forward in time.

No alt text provided for this image

Discounting is the process of moving cash flows back in time.

No alt text provided for this image

For example, for a 100$ timed deposit, with a 6% annual return in 1 year, the value will be 106$. And in 2 years, the value will be 112.36$.

This means, in this case, we should be indifferent to receiving 100$ today, receiving 106$ next year, or receiving 112.36$ in 2 years. You might have noticed that after 2 years, instead of 112$, you have 112.36$, this is because the interest (6$) that you earned in the first year is reinvested at the same rate and you get an additional 0.36$ (6$*6%).

3-????Net Present Value

Net Present Value is the sum of the present value of all cash flow that you will receive, minus the initial investment you made. Let’s look back to our previous example:

No alt text provided for this image

In this project, your initial investment is 10,000 USD, and your yearly cash flow is 5,000 USD. Now you need to discount all the cash flows that will occur in the future to the present. To do this, you need a “discount rate”. The discount rate can be defined in multiple ways with various methods. But assuming you are an individual investor, the bare minimum you need to know is that this discount rate should incorporate 2 things, risk-free investment rate (such as bank’s timed deposit that is covered by the government, government bond yield), and the risk premium (the additional return you need to cover a certain amount of risk.

A risk-free rate is a rate at which you can invest, and you have virtually zero risk. For example, in Indonesia, all timed deposit up to 6.5% interest is covered by LPS (Lembaga Benjamin Simpanan), a government agency that protects people’s savings in the financial institution. Because of the government protection, this 6.5% rate can be thought of as the Risk-Free Rate for Indonesians.

Adding to that risk-free rate is the risk premium. Because you are taking a risk, then you must be compensated for the risk that you take. For example, if you have an investment opportunity with a 5% chance of failure, you will not want to receive just a 6.5% return (the same as a risk-free rate), because you can get 6.5% from investing in a timed deposit without risk.

Let’s say for the previous example that the discount rate is 10% (6.5% risk-free rate + 3.5% premium). Then we can discount the value of cash flow in each year with the formula above.

No alt text provided for this image

Repeating the process for years 2-4, then summing it all up will give us a net present value of 15,849.33 USD, as pictured below.

No alt text provided for this image

As this project have a positive Net Present Value (NPV), then this opportunity can be said as profitable and should be accepted.

4-????Internal Rate of Return

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is a discount rate that makes the net present value of a project zero. For example, our earlier project has an IRR of 34.90%. If we discount all the cash flows with this discount rate, then the NPV will equal zero (Shown below).

No alt text provided for this image

If you have excel, then calculating IRR is very simple, you can use the following formula:

=irr(range of cashflows)

No alt text provided for this image

And the result will be:

No alt text provided for this image

Different from NPV, with IRR, you need to determine if that rate of return is enough for you or not. For example, if the criteria are 10% minimum expected return, then the project satisfies the condition as the IRR is 34.90%.

Usually, when you compare projects with both the NPV and IRR approaches, both approaches will provide you with the same result on which project is more profitable. But in case this doesn’t hold (For example, because of irregular cash flow), you should follow the result of the NPV approach.

5-????Equivalent Annual Annuity

The last concept that I would like to introduce is Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA). For projects with different lifespans, it can be difficult to assess just by using NPV/IRR approach. This approach calculates the annual cash flow generated by the project over its life as if the project is an annuity.

There are 3 steps in this approach:

  1. Calculate all project’s NPV
  2. Compute the EAA of the projects
  3. Compare the EAA and select the highest one

As with IRR, if you are using excel, you can simply use the formula:

=PMT(Discount Rate, Number of Periods, Net Present Value)

For example, if in addition to the earlier project, we have a choice of Project B and Project C with the same discount rate (10%), but different cash flows and different lifespan, we can compare it with EAA like below.

No alt text provided for this image

And the result is:

No alt text provided for this image

Using the EAA approach, we should pick project B, because the cash flow in project B is the same as if we receive 3,854.03 USD per year.


Summary

For projects with equal lives, use NPV and IRR approach, and pick the project with the highest NPV if the result conflicts with each other. But for a project with different lives, the EAA approach is more recommended.


















































































Tamer Hussein CPA, ACMA, CGMA I think ratios shouldn't be only the final for decision makers there should be a professional experienced for helping choosing the right decision For example IRR is misleading when unconventional Cash flow ! When a project has some negative cash flow between other positive cash flows, the equation of the IRR in this case have many IRR.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Dr. Tamer Alsayed, CPA, FCMA, CGMA的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了