How disruptive technologies can create new opportunities and threats for NATO and its allies in the domains of cyber, space, and hybrid warfare
Introduction
The world is witnessing a rapid and profound transformation driven by emerging and disruptive technologies. These are technologies that have the potential to radically change the status quo, create new markets and industries, and challenge existing ones. They can also have significant implications for security and defence, as they can alter the balance of power, the nature of conflict, and the rules of engagement. Some examples of disruptive technologies are artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing, blockchain, reusable rockets, satellite constellations, space-based sensors, autonomous systems, biotechnology, and nanotechnology.
NATO and its allies are facing a complex and dynamic security environment, where they have to deal with a range of threats and challenges from state and non-state actors, such as Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, ISIS, and al-Qaeda. These actors are increasingly using or developing disruptive technologies to enhance their capabilities and undermine NATO’s interests and values. At the same time, NATO and its allies also have the opportunity to leverage disruptive technologies to improve their security and defence, and to maintain their technological edge and strategic advantage.
In this article, I will explore how disruptive technologies can create new opportunities and threats for NATO and its allies in the domains of cyber, space, and hybrid warfare. Cyber warfare is the use of information and communication networks to conduct or support operations in cyberspace. Space warfare is the use of satellites and other objects in outer space to provide or deny services and functions. Hybrid warfare is the use of conventional and unconventional methods to achieve political and military objectives. I will argue that NATO and its allies need to adopt a proactive and coherent strategy to harness the benefits of these technologies, while mitigating the risks and challenges they pose. I will outline the structure of my article as follows: first, I will discuss the cyber domain; second, I will discuss the space domain; third, I will discuss the hybrid warfare domain; and finally, I will conclude with some recommendations and suggestions for future actions and initiatives by NATO and its allies.
Cyber domain
The cyber domain is the virtual realm of information and communication networks, where data is stored, processed, and transmitted. It is an essential and integral part of modern society, economy, and security. Disruptive technologies such as AI, quantum computing, and blockchain can enhance NATO’s cyber capabilities, such as intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, cyber defence, and offensive cyber operations. For example, AI can help analyze large amounts of data, detect anomalies and threats, and automate responses. Quantum computing can enable faster and more secure encryption and decryption of data. Blockchain can provide a decentralized and transparent ledger of transactions and records, reducing the risk of tampering and fraud.
However, disruptive technologies can also increase NATO’s cyber vulnerabilities, such as cyberattacks, espionage, sabotage, and influence operations from state and non-state actors. For example, AI can also be used to create sophisticated malware, bypass security systems, and generate fake or misleading content. Quantum computing can also pose a threat to existing encryption standards and protocols, potentially compromising sensitive data and communications. Blockchain can also be exploited to facilitate illicit activities, such as money laundering, terrorism financing, and cybercrime.
One of the recent cyber incidents involving disruptive technologies was the SolarWinds hack, which was attributed to Russia. It was a sophisticated and stealthy cyberattack that compromised the software supply chain of SolarWinds, a US company that provides network management and monitoring services to thousands of customers, including government agencies and private companies. The attackers inserted malicious code into the software updates of SolarWinds, which allowed them to access and exfiltrate data from the networks of the affected customers. The attack was discovered in December 2020, but it had been ongoing since at least March 2020. The attack had a significant impact on the security and trust of the US and its allies, as it exposed their sensitive information and vulnerabilities.
Another recent cyber incident involving disruptive technologies was the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack in 2021, which was attributed to a criminal group called DarkSide. It was a malicious and disruptive cyberattack that encrypted the data and systems of Colonial Pipeline, a US company that operates the largest fuel pipeline in the US, transporting gasoline and other products from Texas to New York. The attackers demanded a ransom of $4.4 million in bitcoin, a cryptocurrency based on blockchain, to restore the data and systems. The attack was detected in May 2021, and it caused the shutdown of the pipeline for several days. The attack had a significant impact on the economy and society of the US and its allies, as it caused fuel shortages, price spikes, and panic buying.
A third recent cyber incident involving disruptive technologies was the use of deepfakes and bots to spread misinformation, which was attributed to various actors, such as China, Iran, and extremist groups. Deepfakes are synthetic media that use AI to manipulate or generate audiovisual content, such as images, videos, and voices, that appear to be real but are not. Bots are automated software programs that use social media platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, to post or share content, such as messages, comments, and likes, that appear to be from human users but are not. The actors used deepfakes and bots to create and disseminate false or misleading information, such as propaganda, disinformation, and fake news, to influence the opinions and behaviours of the public and the policymakers of the US and its allies. The incidents occurred throughout 2020 and 2021, and they had a significant impact on the politics and democracy of the US and its allies, as they eroded their trust and credibility.
These cyber incidents illustrate the opportunities and threats posed by disruptive technologies for NATO and its allies in the cyber domain. They also highlight the need for NATO and its allies to strengthen their cyber resilience, such as by investing in research and development, establishing common standards and norms, sharing best practices and information, and enhancing cooperation with the private sector and other partners.
Space domain
The space domain is the physical realm of outer space, where satellites and other objects orbit the Earth, providing various services and functions, such as communication, navigation, situational awareness, and missile defence. It is an indispensable and strategic domain for modern security and defence. Disruptive technologies such as reusable rockets, satellite constellations, and space-based sensors can improve NATO’s space capabilities, such as communication, navigation, situational awareness, and missile defence. For example, reusable rockets can lower the cost and increase the frequency of launching satellites and other payloads into orbit. Satellite constellations can provide global and persistent coverage and connectivity, enhancing communication and data transmission. Space-based sensors can provide high-resolution and real-time imagery and information, improving surveillance and reconnaissance.
However, disruptive technologies can also create new threats and challenges for NATO in space, such as anti-satellite weapons, space debris, and space congestion and competition from emerging actors. For example, anti-satellite weapons can damage or destroy satellites and other assets in orbit, disrupting or denying essential services and functions. Space debris can pose a collision risk to satellites and other objects, potentially creating a chain reaction of more debris and damage. Space congestion and competition can increase the likelihood of conflicts and tensions in space, as more actors seek to access and exploit the limited and contested resources and opportunities in space.
One of the recent developments involving disruptive technologies in space was the launch of SpaceX’s Starlink satellites, which was initiated by Elon Musk, a US entrepreneur and visionary. Starlink is a project that aims to create a constellation of thousands of small satellites in low Earth orbit, which will provide high-speed and low-latency internet access to anyone on Earth. The project started in 2015, and it has launched over 1,500 satellites as of June 2021. The project has a significant potential to improve the connectivity and inclusivity of the world, especially for the underserved and remote areas.
Another recent development involving disruptive technologies in space was the test of a hypersonic glide vehicle by China, which was reported by the US intelligence community. A hypersonic glide vehicle is a weapon that can fly at speeds of over five times the speed of sound, and can maneuver in the atmosphere to evade detection and interception. China tested a hypersonic glide vehicle in August 2020, which was launched by a rocket and flew around the Earth before landing in a target area. The test demonstrated China’s advanced and ambitious military capabilities in space, and it posed a serious challenge to the US and its allies’ missile defence systems.
A third recent development involving disruptive technologies in space was the inspection and destruction of one of its own satellites by Russia, which was observed by the US and its allies. Russia conducted a test of a co-orbital anti-satellite weapon, which is a satellite that can approach and attack another satellite in orbit. Russia launched a satellite in November 2020, which then released another satellite, which then approached and destroyed another Russian satellite in July 2021. The test created a large amount of space debris, which endangered the safety and security of other satellites and objects in orbit, including the International Space Station.
These developments illustrate the opportunities and challenges posed by disruptive technologies for NATO and its allies in the space domain. They also highlight the need for NATO and its allies to ensure the security and sustainability of space, such as by developing a space strategy, enhancing space domain awareness, promoting responsible behaviour and norms, and fostering dialogue and cooperation with other space actors.
Hybrid warfare domain
The hybrid warfare domain is the complex and dynamic realm of conflict, where conventional and unconventional methods are combined to achieve political and military objectives. It is a form of warfare that blurs the lines between war and peace, military and civilian, and state and non-state. Disruptive technologies such as autonomous systems, biotechnology, and nanotechnology can enable NATO and its allies to conduct hybrid warfare, which is a combination of conventional and unconventional methods to achieve political and military objectives. For example, autonomous systems can provide enhanced mobility, flexibility, and lethality, as well as reduce the risk of casualties and collateral damage. Biotechnology can enhance the health and performance of soldiers, as well as create new weapons and agents. Nanotechnology can enable the manipulation of matter at the molecular level, creating new materials and devices.
However, disruptive technologies can also expose NATO and its allies to hybrid threats and challenges, such as terrorism, insurgency, proxy warfare, and grey-zone activities from state and non-state actors. For example, autonomous systems can also be used by adversaries to conduct attacks, surveillance, and infiltration, as well as pose ethical and legal dilemmas. Biotechnology can also pose a threat to human security and dignity, as well as create new vulnerabilities and risks of proliferation and misuse. Nanotechnology can also have unforeseen and unintended consequences, as well as raise ethical and social issues.
One of the recent cases involving disruptive technologies and hybrid warfare was the use of drones and improvised explosive devices by ISIS, which was a terrorist group that controlled parts of Iraq and Syria. ISIS used drones and improvised explosive devices to conduct attacks, surveillance, and propaganda against the Iraqi and Syrian forces, as well as the US-led coalition and its allies. The drones and improvised explosive devices were cheap, easy, and effective, and they caused significant damage and disruption. The use of drones and improvised explosive devices by ISIS was a hybrid threat that combined conventional and unconventional methods, as well as state and non-state actors.
Another recent case involving disruptive technologies and hybrid warfare was the deployment of military and paramilitary forces by Russia in Ukraine and Syria, which was a state actor that challenged the sovereignty and territorial integrity of its neighbours and the stability and security of the region. Russia deployed military and paramilitary forces, such as regular troops, special forces, mercenaries, and proxies, to support the separatists in eastern Ukraine and the regime in Syria. The military and paramilitary forces used conventional and unconventional methods, such as artillery, tanks, rockets, cyberattacks, and disinformation, to achieve their political and military objectives. The deployment of military and paramilitary forces by Russia was a hybrid challenge that blurred the lines between war and peace, military and civilian, and state and non-state.
A third recent case involving disruptive technologies and hybrid warfare was the potential use of biological and chemical weapons by rogue states and groups, such as North Korea, Iran, and al-Qaeda. These actors have or seek to acquire biological and chemical weapons, which are weapons that use living organisms or toxic substances to cause harm or death. These weapons can be delivered by various means, such as missiles, rockets, drones, or aerosols. These weapons can have devastating and indiscriminate effects, as well as create fear and panic. The potential use of biological and chemical weapons by rogue states and groups was a hybrid threat that could combine conventional and unconventional methods, as well as state and non-state actors.
These cases illustrate the opportunities and challenges posed by disruptive technologies for NATO and its allies in the hybrid warfare domain. They also highlight the need for NATO and its allies to counter and deter hybrid threats and challenges, such as by enhancing situational awareness and early warning, developing rapid and flexible response options, strengthening resilience and civil preparedness, and building partnerships and trust with other actors.
Conclusion
In conclusion, disruptive technologies can create new opportunities and threats for NATO and its allies in the domains of cyber, space, and hybrid warfare. These technologies can enhance or challenge NATO’s security and defence, and they can alter the balance of power, the nature of conflict, and the rules of engagement. Therefore, NATO and its allies need to adopt a proactive and coherent strategy to harness the benefits of these technologies, while mitigating the risks and challenges they pose.
To do so, NATO and its allies should pursue the following actions and initiatives:
By taking these actions and initiatives, NATO and its allies can ensure their security and defence in the face of evolving and complex security challenges, and they can also contribute to the peace and stability of the world. Disruptive technologies are not only a source of opportunities and threats, but also a source of responsibility and leadership. NATO and its allies have the responsibility and the leadership to use these technologies for good, and to prevent their misuse for evil. This is the challenge and the opportunity of our time.
Text: Microsoft Bing Chat with ChatGPT4
References
#DisruptiveTechnologies
#NATO
#SecurityAndDefence
Exciting insights! The evolving landscape of disruptive technologies adds a new dimension to security and defense.