How to dismantle harmful practices in Social Innovation and Research
Jan Lauschmann Old Tree in Winter II 1964

How to dismantle harmful practices in Social Innovation and Research

In the field of social innovation and research, we face a paradox: many of the methods we use to drive change are, in fact, deeply rooted in systems that perpetuate inequality and exclusion. Traditional practices, often considered "best practices," can reinforce structures such as colonialism, white supremacy, and other forms of oppression. In this article, I will share insights that highlight ways to dismantle these practices and build a fairer, more equitable environment.

1. Question traditional research practices and co-creation methods

Many of the "best practices" we follow were developed in contexts that prioritize data extraction and profit at the expense of the communities involved. This creates a power imbalance where participants are consulted but rarely benefit from the results. To dismantle this model, we need to replace extraction with reciprocity. For example, ensuring that the involved communities receive clear and meaningful returns from research and projects, whether through tangible actions or by valuing their contributions. Knowledge should be shared fairly, benefiting all parties involved.

2. Acknowledge harm and make amends

A common mistake is to treat the harm caused in research, learning, and creation processes as mere "failures." However, causing harm requires repair. This goes beyond just learning from mistakes; it involves taking responsibility for the negative impact those mistakes had on the people or communities involved. Repairing harm doesn't just mean apologizing, but taking concrete actions to correct the damage caused. This approach, while more challenging, is essential to reestablish trust between researchers, innovators, and communities.

3. Somatics: Incorporating the body in the transformation process

Research and innovation tend to focus on the cognitive aspect, neglecting the emotional and physical impact that the process can generate. Many of us carry trauma responses in our bodies from our personal and collective experiences, which can influence our interactions and decisions. Incorporating somatic practices—techniques that help us pay attention to bodily responses—is a powerful way to bring awareness to these dynamics. This allows professionals to perceive how their own emotions and traumas might be impacting how they conduct research and projects, helping to create safer and more honest spaces.

4. Building trust: A priority across all processes

In the research field, particularly in social innovation, trust is the key element for success. Trusting relationships are not built overnight; they require time, transparency, and commitment to the communities involved. This means genuinely listening, responding to needs, and ensuring that people feel safe and respected throughout the process. A trust-based environment is one where participants not only contribute but also feel that their voices are heard and valued.

5. Deconstruct the myth of objectivity

The idea that research must be completely objective, neutral, and detached is one of the most challenging beliefs to deconstruct. In reality, "objectivity" often conceals biases, prejudices, and privileges of researchers. By acknowledging that all research is influenced by subjectivities—our experiences, beliefs, and social positions—we open the door to a more honest and transparent approach. Valuing the lived experiences of the communities involved, rather than treating them as "others," is essential to creating a more humane and equitable research environment.

6. Explore new paths and embrace discomfort

Throughout the process of dismantling harmful practices, moments of discomfort are inevitable. This happens because we are challenging not only established norms but also our own beliefs and behaviors. However, it is precisely in these moments of dissonance that the most profound changes occur. Exploring new questions and methods and being willing to make mistakes are part of a genuine transformation process. True innovation comes from the courage to question the status quo and seek alternatives that are more inclusive, pluralistic, and genuinely open.

What impact do your research and innovation practices holds?

When reflecting on the impact of our social research and innovation practices, it is essential that we create space for self-awareness and individual and collective responsibility. Dismantling harmful practices is not a quick or simple process, but it is necessary to create fairer, more diverse, and transformative spaces. Change begins when we question our practices, acknowledge biases, take responsibility for the harm done, and commit to building a future where dignity, safety, and well-being for all are central. From the outset, from the chosen method to the outcomes, there is always room for questioning and change.


Artigo em português aqui: https://luacouto.substack.com/p/como-desconstruir-praticas-perniciosas

Mayrá Casttro

InvestAmaz?nia I Top Voice I Connector I Partnership builder I Board member I Speaker I Jury member I Ambassador

1 个月

Meaningful inshights!! As a matter of fact, the mindset behind sustainability and so on is rooted in the same old fashioned models. Many "savers" are there to prove it.

Lua Couto

Lideran?a Regenerativa, Conselheira estratégica, Pesquisadora e Palestrante #FuturoPossível

1 个月

No campo da inova??o social e da pesquisa, enfrentamos um paradoxo: muitos dos métodos que utilizamos para promover mudan?as est?o, na verdade, profundamente enraizados em sistemas que perpetuam a desigualdade e a exclus?o. As práticas tradicionais, frequentemente consideradas "melhores práticas", podem refor?ar estruturas como o colonialismo, a supremacia branca e outras formas de opress?o. Neste artigo, compartilharei insights que destacam maneiras de desmantelar essas práticas e construir um ambiente mais justo e equitativo. ?? Artigo em português aqui: https://lnkd.in/di4FjAM3

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了