How to deliver Zero Defect Projects!

FROM THE NEW EDITION OF THE BEST SELLER "ALL CHANGE!"

IN PLAIN SIGHT, IF YOU PAY ATTENTION

?

It’s been a tense 10 days.?I can’t wait to find out more tomorrow.?Franck has promised to email me the directions to the meetings.?Tonight I’m babysitting.?My niece has been watching re-runs of The Apprentice. I know this because when I announced I needed to get to bed early because I had a very important day of meetings to learn about project management she commented, ‘Like in The Apprentice?’

?“Er, yes,” I reply absent-mindedly.

?“I wouldn’t want to be the project manager because if your team gets called into the Board Room you get all the tough questions from Alan Sugar.”

I watched the first series long ago, so I vaguely remember the formula. As I think about a suitable reply, I remember wondering at the time why the task coordinator was called ‘the project manager’. ?In the episodes I’d watched there was little evidence of stakeholder management, planning, risk elimination, learning, resource allocation, team engagement, business case development or even ensuring benefits delivery. ?The absence of leadership was also very evident. ?Because of the competitive nature of the game, the task manager had to deal with team members who would be openly or covertly hostile, trying to undermine them in tasks where the role clarity of the team members was poor.?This was a formula for disaster. Perhaps the title ‘project manager’ was simply aspirational.

?“It’s funny how they can never tell in advance”, she said thoughtfully, “that they are going to get fired.’

?Funny indeed! For me it was also interesting that only the team who had ‘lost’ (i.e., made less money) got a grilling, even though, all too often, the other team had just been lucky and the project management had been atrocious.?And they got no chance to learn what they had done wrong. There was no way for either of the project managers to record what they had done to try to get it right, or where they thought they’d missed something or messed-up. As the thoughts crowd my mind, I’m still silent. ‘The tasks which involve just selling seem to have different challenges and problems from those where they have to create something to sell.’

?“But it seems that as long as you, the project manager, are vocal and demonstrate in the board room and that you have worked really hard to bring the project back once things start to go wrong.?And if you can show it went wrong due to the misbehaviour of your team members, you can avoid the chop.”

?I can think of no response, so I don’t give one.

?“But sometimes”, she continues animatedly, “’the mentors’, I think that’s what they call Sir Alan’s two sidekicks, hang about to criticise and ‘rat’ on the hapless project manager if you just make stuff up.”

?“Mentors indeed”, I think. ?I reply either way it’s the end of the road for both of us. I need my beauty sleep and you just need to sleep.?See you at breakfast.

?As I fall asleep, the very last thought I have is, ‘It’s funny how they can never tell in advance’.

?

DAY IN THE LIFE OF A PERFECT PROJECT

?

I wake early.?And after my stretches and invigorating 2-minute cold shower. I eagerly open the lid on my laptop to check my email.???I’m hoping to plan my travel route and have everything set up before I have to make breakfast for my niece.

I open the email from Franck.?It’s short and there is no destination address.

?-------

SUBJECT:?Directions to Deliver Perfect Projects

MESSAGE:

Here you go.?

https://QUBE.cc/Register

?Sarah will meet you in the Reception at 09:07.?Be a few minutes early, it helps.

This is where you will find their campus.

?-------

“Huh??Franck hadn’t said anything about meeting virtually. He’d talked about them showing me around their amazing campus and me dropping into meetings and workshops.?My heart sinks at the thought of yet another eight hours on teams or zoom staring at hot foreheads and powerpoints.?“Urgh.” I exclaim in disappointment and slight disgust.??The only good news is that I now have time for a more leisurely breakfast.

?“It’s good to see you. Franck said you’d be a minute early.” The voice is coming at me from a purple, square smiley head atop a rectangular body and legs.?She seems to have no arms.?“Welcome to our campus.

Now it’s 09:03.?I was early but I wasn’t expecting this.

?“If you come over to the map, I’ll work you through where you will be going today.!?As she speaks points at a small image on the wall I face.?Above it a yellow and purple location-style pin pops up that she clicks and her slim plank-like, purple avatar slides gracefully away.?I copy her clicking on the yellow and purple pin.?The previously small image on the facing wall now fills my screen.?It is a map of a campus.?We are here she says pointing with a purple laser at a building marked ‘Lobby’. ?You start at 09:15 with John in the Office Block.?Then you will Join me in the Learning Centre. Then I’ll show you round one of my project qubicles. Then Mei will let you sit in on o a teaching session. And finally, you will have a surprise for your last session.?Plan to take lunch at 12:30 until 13:30 in the Community Café.?You have to bring your own food though!”?She laughs.

I don’..'. And then I get the joke and laugh also

?Behind you on the podium is the visitors’ book.?There will be a tab with your agenda

Suddenly I hear her voice behind me.?For a second, I can’t figure out how to turn around, but I’ve played computer games with niece the evening before so I hit the arrow key and of course turn round.

She’s pointing at a green and white slate.?I join her. She instructs “Click on the tab with your name for your agenda”

I do and laid out on the left is a neat time table for my day

??- - - - + - - - -

09:15?Purpose Index Meeting??ExecQubicle John

10:00?Bio Break ?Reception

10:12 ??Performance Indicators????????WorqshopQubicle

12:22?Bio Break ?Reception

12:30?Lunch and Networking???????????Project Community Cafe

13:30?Perspective and Incidents?????

14:17?Practitioner Insight?????????????????TeachingQubicle

15:23?Bio Break ?Reception

16:05?Performance & Implications Mentoring????????????Project Qubicle

16:47?RAPID, LearnBySharing ?????????Reception

17:00 Close

?- - - - + - - - -

On the right are two templates.?As Sarah points at the templates she says, “Come back here during your bio breaks and fill these I as you go thro0ugh the day.??That way at the end of hte4 day we will have a clear summary of what you’ve learnt and what you and your colleagues are going to do about it.”

I nod.?“But how…”

She’s anticipated my question and answers fast, “We tend to use a lot of sticky notes around here.?You get the from the icon”

I have a go Click on the sticky note icon and up pops a box to type into.

“Any other questions?” She asks smartly as if she can’t wait to get me started.

I can’t think of any except, “How do I get to my first session?”

?“Just use the links on the agenda. “

?“We have an etiquette on our campus, we always gather in a circle to face each other to say, ‘bye’”.?

“Use the places short cut to get us to ‘All meet’ in a circle.

I do as she asks and in a second we are face to face.?“Ok Bye,” she says, “See you later”.

Bye I say but she’s gone.?Evaporated with a sound like a light bulb going out.

I stare at the screen for a second.?Raise my head and look round my study.?This is definitely the strangest virtual meeting I’ve ever been to. I move back to the agenda, pause for a moment and then cautiously click the link to ExecQubicle John.

?

?1 Project Purpose Index

?

Puffy white clouds sit below a deep blue sky but a wide-scape of London, the dome of St Pauls towering above the other buildings.?A power view for a power office.?Behind a huge mahogany desk covered in massive monitors stands a red avatar with a welcoming smile and a deep voice, “I’m John,” he says warmly, in introduction.?“Franck was very persuasive in getting us to host you for the day.?He says you’re one of his students.”

“In a way, yes very much so.?Franck has been coaching me for many years. “

“We don’t often meet many people interested in how to achieve zero project defects, as we do.?I have learnt that most people think it is impossible and get distracted by whatever is the current project management fashion.?I understand these days it’s AI, neuroscience and rewilding.?There isn’t a passion to eliminate surprises from projects and make more happen with less stress.”

I confess instantly how I’d guffawed when I’d been challenged to deliver perfect projects.

John replies sadly, “I know.” Nodding the head of his avatar. Then he perks up.?Well good you are on time we have time for me to explain what will otherwise be bewildering.??So, first things first, Franck would have explained to you that not all change is improvement and that successful change is chosen to be complete and carried out without creating destructive change?” He says slowly and solemnly, “A ‘complete’ project is everything from the spark of an idea to an established process, behaviours or final deliverable.”

“Yes. I agree.?Franck has drummed that into my head.” Then out of curiosity I add, “How did you nod your avatar head??I keep nodding my real head but I guess you can’t see that?”

He laughs.?When you slide the screen or move your pointer your head moves.”

I slide up and down.

“I see you agree.” he responds.?Once we see a need for change either to address a problem or issue, or to improve what we currently do or to create a positive business result from a possibility or opportunity the first thing we do is check it is worthwhile.?As our projects are all novel, we also need to work out what we will observe and measure to be sure we are going in the right direction and not disrupting the current business or other projects.?Make sense?”

“So If I’ve understood you correctly, you not only check the business case but also how to keep on track?”?

“Correct.?So the purpose of this meeting is to take a challenge we have and establish what resolving it involves and what benefits it brings.?We tend to be very open and challenging and also to seek wide opinions and accept a level of vagueness.?Who does the proposed project touch??We look for people who are stakeholders and invite them to the meeting.?Come over here he says as his avatar glides to a white board to my right, this is the PET, er I mean People Engagement Tool that we use for finding them.

I follow him and say, I know about Franck’s PETs.?

Now we are facing a PET titled “Stakeholder Grid 1”

I squeal with delight.?I know this one.

?“Do you have many in box 4?”

John replies, “Several, too many. So the project had better be worth it. Anyway once we’ve found the stakeholders to Invite, we go through a simple process.?We share a vague outline of the situation in advance. When they arrive, we capture their hopes and fears quickly squashing any fears.??Then we brainstorm together the up and downsides of the project and what it entails.?That allows us to make guesses at what metrics and measurements or performance indicators we can set to track overall progress and success.?We call it a ‘Leap-the-Gap’ meeting.

“The Gap?” I ask uncertainly.

“Yes, the Gap.?The difference between where we are and where we would like to be.?We use this PET”. He flips a tab and I’m face to face with an old friend, Franck’s GapLeap PET.

I squeal in delight again.

?As I’m about to speak a blue avatar materialises in the middle of the room.?She’s rapidly followed by eight more. We gather in a circle to greet each other and the Leap-The-Gap meeting begins.

?Now we are facing a PET where we’ve created stickies in four colours; red, burgundy, grey and black.

?John is summarising, ?“So these are our Project Performance Indicators. ?Red – Soft indices for tracking success during the project are, ‘Moans and groans from the telecall centre people’… and lists several more.?Then he goes on to burgundy for Hard indices.?Any comments?” he asks slowly continuing, “Ok let’s SpinCast”.?As if choreographed, the participants begin to speak one after another in alphabetical order.?This really is brilliant. It solves the normal tumble weed problem and even introverts get a say without having to fight for it.

The process repeats for the outcome/ deliverable indices with grey for soft and black for hard.

? ?

2 Project Performance Indicators

?Performance:?How will we know we are succeeding?

Now it’s 10:05 and I’m working out what to write in the Visitors book. It is set at my tab. ?I’m determined to complete the LearnBySharing PET but I’m stalled.?There’s almost too much to add.?“My biggest surprise?”?What to I chose??How productive we were? The ease of using Franck’s PETs in this super-real world??SpinCasting? ?That we gathered in circle at the end of the meeting?

?I add the letter ‘s’ to the word ‘surprise’ and produce a blizzard of writing on sticky notes for all of them.?I nod to myself satisfied and trying to remember what I do next.?Oh yes, “use the link to find your next session.” l do. I click on the words WorqshopQubicle.

?Now I find myself in hangar-like, bright yellow room.?Directly ahead of me are several bar tables.?Clustered in groups are over a dozen other people. I’m beginning to think of the boxy avatars not as funny shapes but as individual people.?And I can hear voices. Lots of voices but muted and muffled.?Then I hear Sarah’s voice.?I’m glad you made it and early.?That gives me five minutes to tell you what this is.

?Follow me to the small discussion board and with that she turns and glides to a whiteboard to my right.?I join her. By now I’m getting used to navigating. I use the short cut of places in the menu to go to the Small discussion board.?

?“Let’s start with” the purpose, who points to a version of the 5Ps PET I recognise. ?The purpose is to provide a baseline for the project so we only have to deal with and monitor indicators for unexpected challenges.?This baseline is how I will be judged.?I’m seen to be doing a great job if nothing bad we predict here happens and extra great if I identify emergent challenges and preliminate them, oh she says, pausing as if to think of a different way to explain this to me, “I mean eliminate them before they manifest themselves” We combine our knowledge of what happens consistently to different types of projects with what we know about our organisation and the personalities of the people and stakeholders we will encounter.?I’ve invited all the people from the cradle of the project to its cradle to the point it ends or transitions to a process.?Together we will predict what could happen next.?The analogy we have is to think of a plane that suddenly has no engines…”

“Like Pilot Sully and his landing on the Hudson?” I interject excitedly remembering Franck’s homework exercise and finally understanding why he had set it.?

“Yes, just like Sully, but here we think of a Project manager-less project.?What will happen if all project management skills were withdrawn from the project?”

“I see”, I say thoughtfully

Once we’ve worked out the glidepath we spend time prelimiting all the obvious issues now. In that way the project I’m handed is a baseline.?And we can track performance by the absence of the indicators we have identified.

I’m silent.?This is completely different from anything I have ever thought or done in project management. I’m not sure what questions to ask

“Here”, says Sarah, let me show you some past examples.?Follow me.”?She glides to the other side of the room stepping over a cube on the floor.?The faces of the cube are covered with symbols.

“Hey!” I say excitedly, “Are those project types?”?I recognise the symbols for being Lost in the Fog, Going on Quest, Making a Movie and Painting by Numbers. Those are the four basic project types that range from complete uncertainty in what to do and how to do it, through uncertainty in either what to do in the project or what the end point is.?And the final type of change is one of clarity in goals and methods.?

"You are familiar with them?”

“Absolutely” I respond, “And I see you have the ‘empty eye’ to illustrate if progress is obvious and measurable and visible, like in a construction project.?Or totally invisible, hard to observe or check or measure, like in an organisation cultural transformation!”

“Precisely, says Sarah enthusiastically, her purple head nodding. “And of course the political angle that arises from “who is Driving the change? versus Who has to deliver? Internal projects where the drivers and deliverers are in the same organisation and no money changes hands are the worst.

?“And Turnkey projects where the Drivers and Deliverers have no common goal, one wants the job done and the other wants the money, are the worst for contractual fighting

She laughs.?“Great.?So here are some generic GlydePaths we created earlier.” She turns and points at four posters splattered with sticky notes.?

“What are the orange and green arrow stickies about?”

?“Oh she explains. Once we have mapped the issues, we preliminate them by…,” the lights in the room flash a couple of times, “and now we are out of time.?If you don’t want to be dragged, along go and gather with the others in a circle.”

She’s gone but I’m slow and suddenly it’s as if a tractor beam is pulling me and there is nothing I can do to resist.?And now I’m gathered in a circle with all the other people.??[END for now]