How to Conquer 5 Cognitive Biases in User Research
Reestify - Your Digital Partner
We provide white-label Design, Development, and Marketing solutions for B2B businesses.
Ever feel like you're getting skewed results from your user research? You're not alone. Even the best designers can fall victim to cognitive biases, subconscious thought patterns that influence our interpretation of information and decision-making.
These biases can subtly warp your research, leading to inaccurate data and ultimately, products that miss the mark. But fear not! By understanding these common biases and employing specific techniques, you can safeguard your research and gather valuable user insights.
1. Confirmation Bias: Seeing What You Want to See
Imagine, you've poured your heart into designing a new app feature. User feedback rolls in, and you eagerly scan the comments. But instead of reading all the feedback, you focus on the comments that validate your initial ideas, conveniently ignoring (or downplaying) the ones that contradict them.
This is confirmation bias in action. We all tend to favor information that confirms our existing beliefs, while downplaying or dismissing contradictory evidence.
How to Overcome It:
2. Anchoring Effect: The Power of First Impressions
Imagine asking users to rate the complexity of a task on a scale of 1 (easy) to 10 (difficult). But before they answer, you show them an example of a similar task rated as “8” on the scale. This subtly influences their perception, making them more likely to choose a number close to 8, even if it wouldn't be their initial response.
This is the anchoring effect, where the first piece of information we encounter becomes a reference point that biases our subsequent judgments.
How to Overcome It:
3. Order Effect: The “First and Last” Rule
Imagine crafting a survey with questions listed from top to bottom, mimicking the app's navigation flow. While logical, this approach might unintentionally influence users' responses. They might focus primarily on the first few questions, neglecting later ones, or be heavily influenced by the final question.
This is the order effect, where the order in which options or questions are presented can sway respondents' choices.
How to Overcome It:
4. Peak-End Rule: Remembering the Highlights (or Lowlights)
Imagine a user struggling with a frustrating onboarding process, followed by a smooth and efficient experience using the app. Despite the overall positive experience, they might rate the app poorly based solely on that initial challenge, thanks to the peak-end rule.
This rule states that users tend to base their judgment of an experience on the peak (most intense) and end moments, neglecting the rest of the journey.
How to Overcome It:
5. Observer-Expectancy Effect: When Research Becomes Reality
Imagine asking users, “Isn't our product much easier to use than any other you've tried?”?
This subtly leads them to answer positively, even if it's not entirely accurate. This is the observer-expectancy effect, where the researcher's expectations unintentionally influence the user's responses.
How to Overcome It:
By understanding and actively combating these common cognitive biases, you can ensure your user research yields accurate and valuable insights, paving the way for successful products that truly resonate with your target audience.