How to choose parameter levels for 
 Full Factorial ( FF ) and 
Variable Search ( VS ) experiments

How to choose parameter levels for Full Factorial ( FF ) and Variable Search ( VS ) experiments


Though there are a lot of similarities between the two - the purpose of the 2 experiments is totally different. FF helps you to fine tune process parameters, to improve results; whereas VS is to determine which parameters are critical or important, or rather to weed out noncritical parameters.

?First one carries out VS to determine critical parameters, which will be in most cases not more than 4. And then carry out FF on these 4 or less parameters to determine the optimum one.

In both experiments, it is recommended that one set of parameters be always those which are in use, as they are supposed to be the known as the best,( that is why they are being used.) Unless you have specific reason not to choose them. The second set of parameters are chosen differently.

For VS choose second level which is worse or marginal( which should be otherwise in use in normal production.)Normally it is known to persons who are managing the process.  Do not choose a level which will give 100% rejection or worst possible results.

Whereas in the case of FF, the second parameter should be the one which is likely to be better than the original level. This is less likely to be obvious, that is why it is not being used. Many times it could be because of interaction effects. The purpose of the experiments is to confirm the not so obvious combination of parameters which would give better than current results.


要查看或添加评论,请登录

Vidyutkumar Bapat的更多文章

  • While on a pleasure trip to Mysore

    While on a pleasure trip to Mysore

    Years ago, while on a pleasure trip to Mysore My old, HMT Janata watch - a very popular brand in my school days…

    2 条评论
  • Deming #4

    Deming #4

    Have one vendor for one part. Eliminate multiple vendors.

    16 条评论
  • Surrogate Parameter

    Surrogate Parameter

    Do you know, one of the least used and understood Quality Improvement Tools, is a weighing balance? Yes, a simple…

    3 条评论
  • Use data… but dont do it blindly

    Use data… but dont do it blindly

    During World War II, numerous fighter planes were getting hit by anti-aircraft guns. Pilots wanted some protective…

    3 条评论
  • Levels in service

    Levels in service

    Level 1 - Recently while transiting at an airport, after getting out of the aircraft, when I asked a guide/airline…

    1 条评论
  • Write a book - you will enjoy it

    Write a book - you will enjoy it

    I have written and published my first book recently. I was quite late… have you published your own book yet? If not…

    13 条评论
  • Boeing 737MAX

    Boeing 737MAX

    How to solve a problem? The hot subject in the field of air travel today is about Boeing 737MAX. Two planes have…

    8 条评论
  • Most practical tools

    Most practical tools

    SigmaGuru is helping clients improve their profitability for more than 20 years, but I was foxed when one asked me to…

    5 条评论
  • Are you a 9 to 11 organisation?

    Are you a 9 to 11 organisation?

    Whenever I enter a new organisation, I try to figure out whether they are running a 9 to 11 process or a 10+/- process.…

    3 条评论
  • Do you know, one of the least used and understood Quality Improvement Tools, is a weighing balance?

    Do you know, one of the least used and understood Quality Improvement Tools, is a weighing balance?

    Yes, a simple weighing balance is one of the most useful and sometimes most effective tool for Quality Improvement…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了