I shared before that the model evaluation metric is your north start ie your destination and the process of choosing the model evaluation metric helps you to plan the direction of your model.
from a learning perspective, it also helps to correlate the downstream processes to the model evaluation metric - specifically to correlate feature engineering to model evaluation. Typically, we think of feature engineering and model evaluation as two distinct processes but it helps to think of them holistically.
Feature engineering significantly influences model performance and evaluation outcomes, as the features represent the data inputs the model learns from.
We can think of feature engineering and model evaluation as a feedback loop. By maintaining a feedback loop between feature engineering and model evaluation, you ensure that the model is optimized not just for learning, but for producing meaningful and actionable predictions.
1. Impact of Features on Model Quality
- Relevance of Features: The choice and transformation of features directly affect how well the model captures the patterns in the data. High-quality features lead to better model performance metrics such as accuracy, F1-score, or R2.
- Irrelevant Features: Including irrelevant or redundant features can introduce noise, leading to overfitting or underfitting, which negatively impacts evaluation metrics.
2. Model Evaluation as Feedback for Feature Engineering
- Identifying Weaknesses: Poor evaluation metrics can indicate issues with the features, such as missing key information or the presence of irrelevant data.
- Feature Importance Analysis: Techniques like SHAP, LIME, or permutation importance during model evaluation help identify which features contribute most to the model’s predictions, guiding iterative improvements in feature engineering.
- Error Analysis: Examining model errors (e.g., misclassifications or high residuals) can reveal patterns that suggest the need for new or transformed features.
3. Iterative Process
- Feature engineering and model evaluation often follow an iterative cycle. After engineering features, the model is trained and evaluated. Based on the evaluation results, features are refined to improve the model further.
4. Domain-Specific Metrics
- In specific domains, model evaluation metrics may dictate the feature engineering strategy. For instance:In classification problems, metrics like precision and recall may indicate the need for features that better separate classes. In regression problems, metrics like MAE or RMSE can point to specific ranges of input features that need better representation.
5. Automated Feature Engineering and Model Evaluation
- Automated tools like AutoML perform feature engineering and immediately evaluate models, using feedback loops to refine features until the optimal set is identified based on evaluation metrics.
6. Feature Scaling and Normalization
- Evaluation metrics are sensitive to feature scaling issues, especially in models that rely on distance metrics (e.g., SVMs, KNN). Poor metrics could highlight the need for techniques like normalization or standardization.
7. Feature Interaction and Non-Linearity
- Non-linear relationships or interactions between features often require engineering techniques such as polynomial features or embedding layers. Model evaluation can confirm if such additions improve metrics.
If you want to study with me at #universityofoxford see our course on #AI #genAI and #mlops
