How can GPS indicate poor driver performance and the need for refresher training?
I was sent an email with the following comment:
1. Training drivers
Hazard: Driver lacks competence in essential skills for safe driving:
a)?????? Analyse competency assessment conducted during the hiring process to identify gaps in knowledge or skills. Some examples might include:
·???????? ?poor understanding of vehicle safety systems/driver aids
·???????? limited ability to manoeuvre vehicle in reverse
·???????? poor knowledge of load restraint techniques and principles.
b)????? Ensure the driver receives training to address the identified knowledge or skill gaps before being permitted to commence work driving a heavy vehicle.
c)?????? Conduct on-going training. For example, toolbox meetings, regular refresher training in essential driving knowledge and skills.
领英推荐
d)????? Provide targeted training when feedback identifies opportunities to improve understanding of good driving practice. Feedback may be sought or received from workers or other parties in the CoR, Police or Safety Compliance Officers, members of the public
===================================================
Thinking about this I started wondering how to get a better ROI on GPS systems and where these are not installed in vehicles as a further reason to install them.
Standard GPS data systems play a crucial role in analysing driver performance and assisting organisations in meeting safety requirements. By reviewing reports on harsh braking, harsh cornering, and harsh acceleration, these systems provide valuable insights into driver behavior and performance.
One of the primary advantages of these data systems is their ability to identify instances of harsh braking, cornering, and acceleration. These maneuvers can be indicative of poor driver performance and unsafe driving habits. For example, frequent harsh braking may suggest tailgating or failure to maintain a safe following distance, while harsh acceleration can indicate aggressive driving patterns. Identifying these behaviors allows employers to address and rectify them, thereby improving overall driver performance and reducing the risk of accidents.
By considering the reports generated by the GPS data systems, a PCBU (Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking) can meet the safety requirements outlined in the Heavy Vehicle National Law (HVNL) and Safe Work Australia's document on Vehicles as a workplace. These reports provide concrete evidence of driver behavior and can be used to implement training programs or corrective actions to promote safe driving practices. Employers can develop specific strategies to address areas of concern highlighted in the reports, such as providing additional training or reiterating safe driving practices.
Incorporating GPS data systems into the workplace promotes a safety-focused culture by making drivers aware that their behavior is being monitored and evaluated regularly. This awareness can inspire employees to adopt safer driving habits, reducing the likelihood of accidents and promoting a safer working environment. Moreover, when employees know their performances are being measured, it incentivizes them to continually strive for improvement.
In summary, standard GPS data systems offer a valuable means of monitoring and analysing driver performance. By reviewing reports on harsh braking, cornering, and acceleration, employers can identify areas of poor driver performance and implement strategies to address them. This proactive approach supports compliance with the safety requirements set forth by the HVNL and Safe Work Australia, ultimately fostering a safer workplace for drivers and other road users.
How have you considered how using GPOS data can benefit your review of improving driver behavior and reducing your maintenance and running costs?