How to Build a More Sustainable and Circular Feedstock
Author: Amy Anderson | Editor: Jae Allen, Herica De Casas (fabricfeed)
Whether you are developing a sustainable feedstock or looking to make more informed choices as an apparel consumer, we’ve outlined key factors below to help you consider better end-of-life solutions.
Designing fabric inputs with outputs in mind is a critical shift needed in the industry. When building more sustainable apparel & textiles, we must consider how our inputs translate into outputs for more circular, environmental solutions. This is especially important with the incoming shift toward extended producer responsibility, such as California’s SB-707 legislation, which brands and manufacturers need to start planning for. Avoiding addressing these issues could result in major consequences (sometimes with fines as large as $50,000 per day!). A good starting point for designing with outputs in mind is to consider your design features, fabric and fiber types, and applications.
Fabric and Fiber Types
Considering the sustainability inputs of a fabric or feedstock before the manufacturing process is also a critical factor. Identifying your preferred fabric or feedstock should account for the environmental inputs required to grow, produce, process, and refine the material, as well as the reuse pathways or options at its end-of-life. Additionally, blending fiber types with more than two components often leads to complexities in matching outbound use. Similarly, garments composed of multiple sections with varied textiles compromises reusability and recyclability. For example, pants made with cotton legs but polyester pocket linings would require the removal of those pockets and lining to be recycled. Digital fiber tags are a powerful tool for supporting garment reusability, providing transparency in fiber type and traceability through its lifecycle.
Below is a breakdown of fabric and fiber type suggestions, along with their limitations to recycling and downcycling:
Design Features
When choosing applications and details for your desired garment, avoid trims that require glues or adhesives, varied types of plastic, or large amounts of metal that may limit reusability. Below are examples of design features with limitations in the recycling and downcycling landscape:
Applicants & Dyes
Dyes not only contribute to harmful runoff and exposure in factories and during user wear, but they can also limit reuse options, such as recyclability. Currently, these are some limitations that recyclers are more likely to refuse:
Exclusive Bonus!
Fabricfeed held an exclusive Q&A with Amy Anderson, taking an even deeper dive into the circularity of garments. If you’d like access to the bonus, behind-the-scenes content, drop “Q&A” in the comments and we’ll DM it to you.
Thanks for reading! Resource-sharing is an integral piece to building a more sustainable textiles ecosystem. If you have more questions or curiosities about how to build a more sustainable fabric supply, please follow fabricfeed or connect with Amy Anderson on Linkedin for more details.?
Director of Clinical Operations & Compliance Altior Healthcare, Executive Director I BE I AM
3 周Q&A
Sustainable Fashion & Circular Economy Strategist | Regenerative Agriculture in Textiles Advocate | "The Climate Reality Leader" ???? ????
3 周Thanks for sharing this, Amy Anderson and fabricfeed! I appreciate the insightful article on building a more sustainable and circular feedstock. The emphasis on designing fabric inputs with outputs in mind is indeed critical for the future of our industry, especially in light of impending regulations like California's SB-707. I am eager to learn more about the major challenges U.S. companies will encounter regarding these new mandate. Specifically, I would love to hear about the difficulties in securing recycling solutions and how niche brands can navigate these complexities.