How Not To Blame Your Partner (even if you're convinced they're wrong)
Mounica Veggalam
Coach & leadership trainer for managers, entrepreneurs, and executives | Culture & alignment coach for scale-up teams | Former software engineer
In a TV interview, a famous South-Indian actress said, "I gave everything I could to my relationship." The subtext story is that they got a divorce because her husband cheated on her. Her heartbreak, the betrayal, and the grief are piercing and justified. Yet...
"I had to divorce because he cheated on me."
...she put the responsibility subtly over there, even if it's the truth.
Compare that to:
"I'm a NO to a relationship which is not monogamous or dedicated. It makes me resentful. I choose out."
The second statement is more empowered, even though there's heartbreak. It indicates responsibility for her desire, personal autonomy, and self-capacity.
I get it. Relationships are complex and messy. I've been on the side of pushing and blaming my partner more than I'd like, sometimes passively through the stereotypical husband/wife jokes and, at my worst, pointing fingers about how I've been wronged.
Despite the complexity, there's something magnetic about people who communicate with a mental and emotional power about their relationships. Admittedly, the South-Indian actress's case is extreme, and most relationships hang somewhere in between passive-aggressive jokes, bottled-up resentment, and occasional intense fighting, all symptoms of a dynamic of blame. Working towards seeing your partner with an elevation from blame is beneficial not only for the obvious reason of the relationship's health; It indicates your self-leadership across life in all your roles -- manager, coach, teammate, parent, friend, etc.
I like Peter Drucker’s simplified explanation of Self-Leadership: being a self-leader is to serve as chief, captain, or CEO of one’s own life. It means to have the ability to influence communication, emotions, and behaviors.
Said differently, self-leadership is about the capacity and power to act from an altitude rather than the default patterns. It necessarily means we have to leave our automatic comfortable and familiar states of being.
In a relationship, it means we have to let go of some precious things-- our justified perspective on why they're wrong, our opinions on what they should do or should have done, and our intense need for them to be a different way. But does that mean we let go of our happiness, embrace it if it sucks, and never ask for behavior change?
领英推荐
Short answer: No, the self-leadership way in a relationship is to find a way to arrive at taking responsibility for needs, desires & emotions and choosing to stand for partnership or individual sovereignty.
"I'm a NO to a relationship which is not monogamous or dedicated. It makes me resentful. I choose out."
We draw out the responsibility for personal preferences & associated emotions and make choices to either change or stand for those preferences.
But how do we get here when the defaults of blame are too strong? They should be different. It would work out if they were different. I'm doing everything I can; they need to change.
We develop the power to hold our judgments, emotions, and beliefs and operate from a different place, in the face of how other people are. A place where:
Arriving at self-leadership in a relationship is understandably challenging. One frame I find really helpful (and suggest to my private coaching clients), in doing the difficult work of self-leadership is this:
The possibility of creating a self-transforming relationship, a system in which separate identities are co-regulated by both holding and being held. A system that moves out of psychological co-dependency and into inter-dependency, i.e., rather than each partner protecting themselves & the other to survive life's challenges, each calls out the expression of evolution and growth in the other, supporting life's complex motion of evolution.
Thanks for reading! I'll see you next time. If you'd like to connect and learn more, here are more ways:
This is a great framing! One thing that I think is worth calling out in this situation is that it's not so much about saying No to a particular arrangement but saying No to a relationship which does't involve honesty and caring communication about each other's needs. This seems to be really the key to resentment in this situation: a broken trust in the other side's commitment to this type of caring for one another. More generally, I think there's a tricky balance between personal empowerment in owning these types of broken trust situations and recognizing that there's actually some blame that needs to be apportioned. I fear that going to far into the personal empowerment in situations where a clear break of trust is involved will lead people to just withhold their trust in the future -- and that's not necessarily a good thing for them either.