How Behavioral Economics Can Revolutionize Debt Recovery
Nádia Lanny Lopes
Head de Cobran?a @ 99Pay | Colunista Especializada em Crédito e Cobran?a
Traditional debt segmentation, based solely on criteria like the amount owed and the overdue period, has long been employed by companies to manage delinquency portfolios. However, this approach focuses more on the characteristics of the debt than on the specifics of the client, often resulting in less effective collection strategies. To improve outcomes, it is essential to adopt a client-centered perspective that considers their behaviors, attitudes, and financial situations. Moreover, leveraging behavioral elements like nudges can transform communication methods for different types of clients.
Limitations of Traditional Segmentation
Categorizing debts only by value and overdue period offers a limited perspective of the debtor's reality. This method ignores behavioral and contextual factors that influence the client’s ability and willingness to pay. For instance, two clients with identical debt amounts and overdue periods may have entirely different motivations and obstacles affecting their ability to settle.
Furthermore, this homogeneous segmentation often leads to standardized collection strategies that overlook individual nuances. This not only reduces the effectiveness of recovery efforts but may also damage the client relationship, jeopardizing future business interactions.
We are dealing with people, human beings—Homo economicus. Given this, does it make sense for strategies to focus solely on debt characteristics? Wouldn't it be more productive to consider the individual behind the debt?
The Importance of a Client-Centered Approach
An effective collection strategy must prioritize the client, understanding their needs, behaviors, and unique circumstances. By adopting a client-centered approach, companies can develop personalized solutions that enhance the likelihood of debt recovery while strengthening the consumer relationship.
For example, identifying that a client is facing temporary financial difficulties allows the company to offer installment plans or deadline extensions, demonstrating empathy and flexibility. This personalization not only facilitates debt settlement but also fosters client loyalty to the brand.
Evidence from Recent Studies
Throughout my career, I have always considered two key dimensions: willingness to pay, linked to character, and ability to pay, related to resource availability. However, the study Personalized Communication Strategies: Towards A New Debtor Typology Framework expanded this view by proposing a new framework for debtor typology based on four behavioral dimensions:
By combining these dimensions, researchers identified 16 distinct debtor typologies. Each represents a unique combination, enabling a deeper understanding of individual client behaviors and needs.
领英推荐
Distribution of Typologies
The study’s analysis revealed five predominant debtor typologies that account for 63% of cases:
Implementing Client-Centered Strategies
To transform the collection approach, companies should:
Conclusion
Traditional segmentation, by focusing on the debt rather than the client, limits the effectiveness of collection strategies. Incorporating a client-centered approach that considers behavioral and financial dimensions enables companies to develop more effective and empathetic strategies. This not only improves recovery rates but also strengthens long-term client relationships.
The future of collections lies in understanding people—their motivations and behaviors. As the study demonstrates, it is time to rethink traditional strategies and embrace an approach that combines data, empathy, and innovation.
Reference
DOEVENSPECK, M.; VAN DONGEN, E. Personalized Communication Strategies: Towards a New Debtor Typology Framework. arXiv, 2021. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.01952. Accessed on: December 5, 2024.
Partner and Product at Kollecta
3 个月Faz bastante sentido. Na minha opini?o, existe o desafio de conseguir coletar bons dados do cliente de forma consensual. Geralmente o devedor n?o quer tanto papo. Ainda mais conseguir fazer isso em escala. A parte da coleta parece um desafio muito maior do que a segmenta??o em si e a parte técnica para operacionalizar isso. Sem o engajamento ou consenso do devedor, fica bem difícil obter dados de comportamento úteis