How Bad Are Our Public Sector Banks? Here Are Some Vital Statistics
Tamal Bandyopadhyay
Consulting Editor, Business Standard & Senior Adviser, Jana Small Finance Bank. Linkedin Top Voice in 2015 & 2019
Bashing our banks, particularly the government-owned ones, which roughly have 70% market share of assets, has become a favourite pastime for many. Instead of going deep into the causes of deterioration in health and the possible remedies, let’s focus on some of the vital statistics to get a sense of the state of affairs in the ?150 trillion banking system in the world’s fastest growing large economy.
In the March quarter, 19 of 21 public sector banks (PSBs) announced losses totalling ?62,681 crore. Three listed private banks, too, made losses; overall, the banking system’s net loss was ?55,648 crore. The loss, highest in any quarter historically, was triggered by provision or the need to set aside money to provide for banks’ rising bad loans and erosion in the value of their bond portfolio.
Indeed, massive provision has eroded their profits but what about operating profits? PSBs’ operating profit in the March quarter dropped 26% from what it was a year earlier; 14 of them have posted declines and one reported a loss. The Private banks have posted 16.7% growth in operating profit during the quarter.
Overall, operating profit of all listed banks in the March quarter dropped 11% because of anaemic growth in both interest income and other income, including fees. PSBs’ net interest income rose 1.25% but other income dropped 3.5%. For the entire industry, income from both the streams has grown little over 5% each, because of a few private banks’ better performance.
Now comes the uglier part. Gross non-performing assets (NPA) of listed banks have grown 44% in the past one year to ?10.25 trillion, with PSBs accounting for ?8.97 trillion and private banks, Rs1.28 trillion.
After provisioning, net NPAs were to the tune of ?5.18 trillion, up 32% from the figure in March 2017. Here, too, PSBs have the lion’s share of ?4.5 trillion.
Four PSBs now have at least one-fourth of their loan books rotten (IDBI Bank Ltd, Indian Overseas Bank, Uco Bank and United Bank of India) and another three have one-fifth of their loan books turning bad (Dena Bank, Central Bank of India and Bank of Maharashtra). Barring two (Vijaya Bank and Indian Bank), all PSBs have at least 10% or more gross NPAs.
After provisions, three PSBs have more than 15% net NPAs and 11, to their credit, have net NPAs in single digits! Private banks are relatively better off, with none exceeding 10% gross NPAs as yet and only one with more than 5% net NPAs.
This is the state of affairs now. Let’s take a quick look at how their health has been deteriorating over the past three years since the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) reviewed their quality of assets (in the second half of fiscal year 2016) and has progressively taken a hard stance, forcing the banks to move insolvency court against the large defaulters, raising the provisioning requirement for bad loans and dismantling all loan restructuring platforms.
Here, I am picking only the PSB data. In fiscal 2016, this set of banks posted a ?28,490 crore loss; in 2017, they had made a paltry profit of ?474 crore; and in 2018, a loss of ?85,371 crore.
Punjab National Bank’s loss during the past three years has been the highest, ?18,784 crore, followed by IDBI Bank (?17,612 crore) and Indian Overseas Bank (Rs12,628 crore). Bank of India and State Bank India have both recorded over Rs10,000 crore net loss since 2016.
State Bank of India’s gross NPAs during this period have risen four times—from ?56,834 crore in September 2015 to ?2.23 trillion in March 2018. IDBI Bank, too, has seen almost a fourfold rise in bad assets during this period, from ?14,758 crore to ?55,588 crore. All other banks, including the profitable Indian Bank and Vijaya Bank, at least doubled their gross NPAs during this period. The graph of net NPA rise is also very similar.
Those who have been able to grow their loan books are able to contain the growth in NPAs as a percentage of loan assets. For instance, in absolute terms, State Bank’s gross NPAs rose four times but in percentage terms, it little more than doubled since September 2015, from 4.15% to 10.91%; however, for IDBI Bank, the percentage growth, too, is four times, from 6.92% to 27.95%.
IDBI Bank’s net NPAs, in fact, grew more than fivefold during this period, from 3.16% to 16.69%, while others have managed to contain the growth between two and three times. In some cases, it could just be optical illusion ,though. One way of containing percentage growth in bad assets is by expanding the loan portfolio. Very few banks could lend fresh in these troubled times, so they have found an easy way out—write off bad assets.
While the insolvency law has slowly started helping banks recover part of their bad assets, it will be a long haul. At least a few PSBs are fast losing their relevance.
This piece first appeared in www.livemint.com
To read the author’s all previous columns, please log onto www.bankerstrust.in
Tamal Bandyopadhyay, consulting editor at Mint, is adviser to Bandhan Bank. His latest book, From Lehman to Demonetization: A Decade of Disruptions, Reforms and Misadventures has recently been released
His Twitter handle is @tamalbandyo.
Senior Manager Credit at Bank of Baroda
6 年Banks are still not learning...
Building at AMU Leasing | Credit head
6 年As bad as public toilets
Teacher at D.A.V. Public School, Jamalpur
6 年Rather we should come forward with better suggestions.
GENERAL MANAGER ( now Retd.)at Reserve Bank of India
6 年PSU banks were hiding toxic assets for long! During periodic health check ups the banks chose to suppress and hide the ailments to widow dress health report card year after year escaping the medical eye! When accumulated toxin level increased to an alarming level the symptomatic manifestation of criticality of the ailment could no longer be suppressed . The doctors who carried out periodic health check up have been left with no alternative but to administer bitter treatment now eschewing forbearance! The cascading effect of the pervading toxin on the health of ailing banks can be mitigated only thorough purging of contaminated assets with minimal blood loss by skilful surgery in a well equipped operation theatre! While there are many a skill full surgeons available for the purpose there is dearth of well equipped operation theatre for smooth surgery with minimal blood loss! Both the patients as well as the custodians of their health owe explanation to the nation!
Cost Accountant
6 年How would be the idea of bad banks which will shift all NPAs to them and clean the balance sheet of PSU banks?