How bad is bad enough? Why it's now or never for South Australia's politicians to show leadership on child protection
The numbers don’t lie.
And the Productivity Commission’s Annual Report of Government Services data paints a damning picture of South Australia’s child protection system.
Released in recent weeks, this year’s report has, unfortunately, shown a further deterioration in the headline indicators of South Australia’s child protection performance.
The parlous state of our state’s child protection system has been the product of many years of neglect and poor policy decisions.
In other states, the rates of children in care have largely plateaued in the last decade, however, in South Australia, our rates have risen by a whopping 62 per cent.
As a result, our expenditure on out of home care services has risen by an even more alarming rate of 264 per cent over the same period.
That’s an additional $448 million a year needing to be spent on our absurdly and unnecessarily high rates of children in care.
If South Australia were to perform at the national average, we would have 1,560 less children and young people stuck in our care systems.
South Australian taxpayers would save more than $214 million each year.
Imagine $214 million back in our pockets during a cost-of-living crisis or what other key initiatives those funds can be invested back into.
We simply cannot afford – both socially and economically – to continue down this path. Our system, as it stands today, is the product of decades of unimaginative policy solutions where more money has been the answer but provided no real solutions.
While the blame for the current states of affairs doesn’t sit wholly with Peter Malinauskas 's Government, they do have the power to turn it around.
Following last year’s data, Uniting Communities released our bold six point plan to turn around South Australia’s beleaguered child protection system.
The Plan included a range of reforms from a political compact – where MPs put aside partisan politics to work together on this issue - setting targets, legislative changes and a significant refocus of expenditure.
领英推荐
It provided a blueprint for how South Australia could turn around a seriously underperforming system. The Plan didn’t apportion blame or seek to political point score – instead, it provided real and achievable solutions.
In light of this year’s report, Uniting Communities is once again calling for change and the adoption of its Six Point Plan, which includes:
After decades of poor decision-making, misaligned investment and doing what’s always been done, enough is enough.
If we do not embrace innovative change in this space, nor make child protection the political priority it warrants, this data will continue to deliver bad news for children, families and our State Budget.
The answer is not more of the same.
Uniting Communities and many across our sector stand willing and ready to help. We’re ready to help deliver a child protection system that works and that our state deserves.
These are six crucial first steps – we just need our politicians to have the will to change.
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Focusing on some new interests
8 个月Agree entirely Simon. Good to see that data I put up a few weeks ago was useful!
Hi, I'm a parent with lived experience of the child protection system and disability area who works with government and NGOs to help them understand the system from a parent perspective.
9 个月As a parent with lived experience of the child protection system in Qld, I can relate to wanting and needing broad system change in all states of Australia. A national rather than a state approach. Of my 6 children, 5 were removed because of a DV relationship but my family could have been kept together with some help and support. The kids spent 15 years in care of the Department. Millions upon millions of dollars were spent on their care within that time. I begged child safety to return them once they turned 16. The Qld taxpayer was paying a whopping $550K each for my twins, per year. I told the department that with all the work I had done on myself, the fact that I had remained single and had not gone back to any DV relationship in that entire time, the years of councelling to better myself, putting my focus firmly on my family and their needs, I deserved to have my children returned to my care. Even with all that, even though the kids were 16 - meaning that they would get a Centrelink payment but no other cost to the taxpayer - they refused to return them to a mother who had jumped through every hoop for 13 years at that point. They stayed in care, $2.2 million to the taxpayer ?? Why couldn't we get help in the home instead???
Manager
9 个月Really well presented Simon, if only we could get bi partisan support for support of families and the protection of children. It is such a shame that politicians seem to put the party first and the people second. I wish you all the best in continuing to make a difference for those in your community that are most vulnerable.