How AI entrepreneurs are getting "The Lean Startup" wrong
Abhi Nemani
government technology entrepreneur, scholar & fmr public servant (CDO of Los Angeles).
Eric Ries 's Lean Startup methodology made such an impression on me during his time on my board at Code for America that I went on to teach it to grad students at the Harris School of Public Policy at the University of Chicago . Which makes me particularly bemused watching today's AI startups completely misinterpret its core principles.
The contradiction is striking. Ries advocated for using human "concierges" as temporary solutions to validate business hypotheses before investing in expensive automation. Yet today's AI startups are doing precisely the opposite – deploying expensive, general-purpose AI as a temporary solution without a clear path to economic sustainability. It's a fundamental misunderstanding of both technological progression and business model validation.
In the current gold rush of generative AI startups, a curious paradox has emerged. While many founders rush to build businesses atop large language models like GPT-4, a quieter but potentially more revolutionary trend is taking shape: the rise of small language models (SLMs). This shift isn't just about technology – it represents a fundamental rethinking of how AI startups should approach building sustainable businesses.
The Current Landscape: The Concierge Trap
Today's AI startup landscape is littered with what we might call "GenAI concierge" businesses. These startups follow a familiar pattern: they leverage powerful general-purpose AI models to automate services that traditionally required human expertise. It's an appealing pitch – replace expensive human labor with AI that can work 24/7 at a fraction of the cost.
But there's a critical flaw in this logic. Unlike traditional "Wizard of Oz" startups that used human labor as a temporary stand-in for eventual automation, these AI concierge startups are using expensive, general-purpose AI as a temporary solution for... what exactly? The unit economics often don't improve with scale, and API costs are more likely to increase than decrease over time, as we've already seen with recent price hikes from major providers.
The Small Language Model Opportunity
This is where small language models enter the picture. Instead of using heavyweight, general-purpose AI models for every task, forward-thinking startups are beginning to deploy smaller, specialized models that are:
This approach isn't just more economically sustainable – it's often more effective. A small model trained specifically on medical terminology will likely outperform a general-purpose model on medical tasks, while consuming far fewer resources.
Economic Advantages of Going Small
The economic benefits of this approach are compelling:
1. Lower Operating Costs
2. Better Scaling Economics
领英推荐
3. Greater Business Control
Beyond Economics: The Strategic Advantage
The shift to smaller models isn't just about cost savings – it represents a fundamental strategic advantage. By focusing on specific, high-value tasks rather than trying to build general-purpose AI assistants, startups can:
1. Build Deeper Competitive Moats
2. Deliver Better Results
3. Create Sustainable Differentiation
The Path Forward: Right-Sizing AI Solutions
The next wave of successful AI startups won't be built on the premise of replacing humans with general-purpose AI. Instead, they'll focus on augmenting human capabilities with highly specialized, efficient AI tools. For startups looking to capitalize on this trend, the path forward requires a shift in thinking:
1. Start with the Problem, Not the Technology
2. Build for Sustainability
3. Embrace Specialization
By focusing on specialized, efficient solutions rather than trying to replicate general intelligence, startups can build more sustainable, effective, and valuable companies.
Product & Program Management Leader | MBA, PMP | Expert Communicator | Enterprise-wide programs | High Performing Teams | Strategic Planning & Roadmaps | Data-driven Transformation | SDLC / PDLC
1 个月Great article Abhi Nemani ! I think the gold rush for LLMs have started and companies solving customer pain points are going to be successful.
Founder, Principal Advisor | Research, Design, Strategy
2 个月Great perspective, Abhi Nemani! Could also never understand the macro economics at play in case of LLMs. Maybe because we are not solving from the problem standpoint, but a shiny new technology.
Enterprise Architect at Tata Consultancy Services Focused on Artificial Intelligence
2 个月Sreejith Sreedharan
Enterprise Architect at Tata Consultancy Services Focused on Artificial Intelligence
2 个月There is no innovation without an invoice.
Championing Women Leaders to Break Barriers Through Strengths ?? Personal Development Trainer ?? Agile Coach ?? Servant Leader ?? Women in Tech Mentor ?? Speaker
2 个月I agree with SLMs. I've always wondered why everyone races for a new GPT. Great article, Abhi Nemani!