The Houses of Parliament should become virtual, forever
From the House of Commons Annual report

The Houses of Parliament should become virtual, forever

At 1330 BST today Members of the Houses of Parliament will vote on maintaining the ‘virtual’ House of Commons.

During lockdown the House of Commons, in which the UK’s elected officials sit, conduct votes and have offices, has been operating like the rest of the world – using teleconferencing and remote working.

Ostensibly these arrangements have proven difficult for Members of Parliament (MPs). According to BBC reports, “The government says virtual tools allowing members to debate and vote digitally have been ineffective and will be ‘better done face-to-face’. But critics say the government plan will exclude vulnerable MPs and those with caring responsibilities.”

In fact the virtual House ought to be extended forever. The gross expenditure of the House of Commons was £286.3 million in 2018 – 19.

MPs must be housed in London in order to accommodate them. They also need houses in their constituencies which they are voted on to represent in general elections. There are also the costs of travelling to and from their constituencies. This creates unnecessary costs for taxpayers.

When plans were made to repair the crumbling building of the Houses of Commons and Lords, the refurbishments were estimated to be between £3.5 billion and £5.6 billion.

These costs could be significnatly reduced if the Houses of Parliament were to be run virtually from MPs' constituencies, rather than shipping them in and housing them in the bubble of Westminister.

During lockdown, parliamentary debates were notable for their orderly conduct and Prime Ministers questions were clear and efficient exchanges.

By contrast, during debates on site at the House of Commons, MPs are typically a baying mob inhibiting the very discourse they claim to support. Shouting people down is not allowed in the classroom; it is certainly not fitting for adults in serious, political debate.

What the world of business has realised during lockdown is that it can function well remotely.

Politicians in the UK need to accept that any problems they have encountered in this process can and should be remedied easily. The House has been improved by remote working, and any communications that MPs have felt they lacked can be worked around.

Having a more expensive, less efficient political system is not in the interests of the British public. MPs should live and work in their constituencies.

The House of Commons should become a virtual House now, and for the future.


Opinions expressed in this article are the writer's own and do not reflect those of his employers.

Adrian Bennett BA, FCA

Director at Empowered Consulting Ltd

4 年

Great idea Dan...HoC + HoL + all the committees and quangos...but wonder how many ministers there are? they would still find a need to be close to their departments...no Black Rod, ER can push a button from Windsor...endless opportunities as Susan lists below...and they really could spend the time in their constituencies, no need for a HoP travelling circus either...

Susan Brown

Founder & Chairwoman at Zortrex - Leading Data Security Innovator | Championing Advanced Tokenisation Solutions at Zortrex Protecting Cloud Data with Cutting-Edge AI Technology

4 年

Virtual parliament, voting, The MP's 2nd homes, the expenses, the overheads and maintenance of the building, can they secure the virtual parliament and voting in real time, many questions around this topic. Overrall, i like the thought of reduced taxes :-)

Flora McFarlane

GTM @ VivaCity - Head of Strategic Accounts

4 年

Brilliant. "Shouting people down is not allowed in the classroom; it is certainly not fitting for adults in serious, political debate."

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Dan Barnes的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了