Horizon 2020 Proposal Writing - Innovation Potential versus Innovation Capacity
In a previous article we discussed the difference between Communication and Dissemination and how the terminology can be a point of confusion for many Horizon 2020 applicants. In a similar vein, applicants can sometimes be unsure about how to differentiate between innovation potential in the Excellence section (1.4) and innovation capacity to be described under Impact (2.1).?
If we consider the relevant parts of the H2020 collaborative action proposal template/evaluation criteria, we see:
The key differentiating point to take note of:
The innovation potential relates specifically to your project and the exploitation potential of your project results and related impact.
On the other hand, the innovation capacity has a broader aspect and relates to how your results may be used for future innovation in new areas beyond your own project application area. This may include not only the consortium partners therein but also your results being made available for use by other researchers and commercial entities.
In my experience, applicants generally get the first part right, and under Excellence they correctly describe innovation potential and how the expected results/outputs will address the specific challenges of the call topic and deliver benefits that contribute to the expected impacts.
HOWEVER, in Section 2.1 they will often miss out on the inclusion of innovation capacity as one of the "other substantial impacts", perhaps not wishing to duplicate what has already been covered in Section 1.4, rather than appreciating the nuanced distinction and reflect on whether their project results will be capable of stimulating further innovation and use.
领英推荐
Think about whether your project results can stimulate further innovations or can be used beyond the project objectives, perhaps not only for you but also for other organisations in Europe. This will maximise the impact generated from your endeavour. (IPR Help desk)
A couple of ESR sample examples show how this distinction might be considered by evaluators:
(1.4): The novelty and the comparative advantages of this game-changing innovation are highly significant and the prospect for market success is very high.
(2.1): The project has high potential impact on the innovation capacity of industry partners and may contribute to the initiation of further projects on multiplex biomarkers for different cancers.
Finally, a third dimension of innovation, relating to Section 3 Implementation, is the coordination of all innovation related activities under Innovation Management.
This is more self-explaining terminology but it's always good to look to include specific management aspects relating to innovation activity rather than restrict oneself to the more generic management descriptions often used, e.g.?the inclusion of a dedicated Innovation Manager (IM) in addition to the Project Coordinator/Manager. The IM might have responsibility for ensuring that the innovation management processes and structures are sound and working efficiently, while constantly monitoring the market, IP, regulatory and technology landscapes, directed towards ensuring effective product development and later successful market entry.
?? Donald Mc Donagh?is an independent EU R&I funding support specialist offering grant proposal writing/reviewing support to coordinators/consortia.?Experienced in various domains ranging across agri-food, bioeconomy, environment, renewables, raw materials, biotechnology, etc.
For support in proposal writing/editing/reviewing, contact:?[email protected].
R&D Tax Credits, Research Management and Guide
4 年Very good analysis and general guidance!
Food Science consultant, Research Strategy, Open Innovation, Sustainability strategy design.
4 年Useful insights on the ins and outs of grant proposal writing. Thanks Donald.
CEO & Founder @ Crowdhelix
4 年Great blog Donald Mc Donagh ??