The Hopeless Hype Behind AV's.
Image : Wikimedia commons

The Hopeless Hype Behind AV's.

I have been a critic of autonomous vehicles for some time now and their supporters are probably (hopefully) sick of my denouncements, but recently I was asked here on Linkedin to explain my objections more fully, a task too large for the usual reply method to allow so I have outlined my objections in this blog instead.

The whole thrust of AV's has been pushed by technology companies looking to expand into the car market, it has not been demand led, car users as a whole are not hammering at the doors of Google or Tesla insisting that they churn them out by the million right here and now. Instead, the tech companies see them as merely another device, one that just happens to be fitted with wheels and are marketing them as the next big techie thing just as they did PC's and mobiles, however, there are several quite major differences.

1. Computers and mobiles offered something new, they opened up whole new opportunities and the ability to communicate as never before. AV's do not do that, they simply replicate (or attempt to) a very human activity and in doing so they take away from the sum of human experience. What are you going to do while being trundled about, play on your smartphone? You can do that anywhere, but one of life's experiences has been denied you by not driving, your world is closing in, not broadening out. The AV junkies will tell you they hate driving, fair enough, nobody is making them do it so why do they not organise their lives so as to minimise or eliminate the task altogether rather than foist their latest toys upon us?

2. Computers and mobiles do not, as a rule, have the potential to be primary causes of accidents, cars do. So just who is going to be responsible for them while they are on the road? The law of tort has been refined over the last two thousand years at least and now the AV companies think it can be changed overnight to suit their sales graphs. The lawyers have yet to dig their teeth into this aspect. To help avoid accidents there is much talk of connectivity, of cars talking to each other but that is mass surveillance by any measure. Will cyclists and pedestrians also be required to wear transponders or be chipped before going out? Society should not be required to change to suit AV's! And then there are the ethics to be programmed into an AV. AV's only have one method of accident prevention and that's to apply the brakes, how are they to be taught to swerve or choose how to minimise damage and injury. Who is going to get into a car that has been programmed to drive under a truck rather than hit a pedestrian in certain circumstances?

3. Mobile phones have come in for criticism for presenting a health hazard because they emit radio waves. AV's will not just emit radio waves but also lasers as well as filming their surroundings. What effect on human health will these emissions have, or what about the psychological impact of forever being filmed? Has any research been done on these aspects at all? We are entitled to our privacy, indeed, there are rules and regulations controlling the use of CCTV in the UK and Ireland and probably most other civilised countries as well, camera bedecked AV's attempt to drive a coach a horses through this legislation which was put in place to protect us.

4. Personal devices cost from a hundred to a few thousand, most are bought at the cheaper end. We have no idea what AV's are going to cost but I rather suspect they are not going to be cheap, not even in the long run, hence all the talk about car sharing etc, an idea that has been tried numerous times but simply hasn't gained acceptance. Ah but, AV's will be different we are told because they will be like taxis without the expense of a driver. Any taxi driver will tell you they earn peanuts as it is and just how much cheaper do AV taxis need to be than manned ones to get people to abandon their own private transport?

These are just a few points and there are plenty more to be chewed over some day but what is quite clear is that AV's are not going to happen anytime soon. Even Ford who are quite gung ho about them only hope to have a pilot scheme going by 2021 and that is under tightly controlled conditions and in a very well mapped area, and we still don't know how they are going to operate at night!

For what it's worth my advice would be to sell any shares you have in AV orientated companies.

Justin Roberts

Agricultural journalist specialising in farm machinery

7 年

They were hardly disruptive, both were just developments, and a convergence of, existing digital technology, what exactly did they disrupt? The mobile phone business was well established and is still there, it just offers a few more features, an evolution which would have occurred anyway. The big difference with AV's is that they simply cannot be put on to the market for the consumer to decide. Their introduction has to be lobbied for which means we haven't a clue as to what is being said to governments to get them over the line. However, we do know that they we are not being given the whole picture, I have been pressing for over a year now to find out just what strength the radar signal is, what data is collected and retained (including visual images), what is done with it and that's before we get to the legal niceties. Yet I have received only one reply and that was they meet current standards, current standards for what was never explained nor references given. The other great problem is that although you or I may choose not to have anything to do with them will will still be under surveillance from their various sensors. We have a right to privacy enshrined in UN statutes, AV's will rip that to shreds.

回复
Bjorn Karlstrom

Consultant, Special Advisor; E-mobility, Electric Vehicle Drive Technologies, Batteries & Charging Systems, Motors and Motor Control Systems

7 年

Well Justin, the iPod and iPhone was not demand led either! But they were disruptive. It may take quite a while for AV's to gain wide acceptance. I'm certain AV's will redefine how we transport ourselves. Some will elect to be driven, some will elect to drive, and some will use a combination of both, depending on the circumstances.

回复
Yaron Kretchmer

Sr. Manager, MTIA Compilers and performance @Meta

7 年

Interesting perspective ! I , for one ( speaking just for myself, not for my employer) am very excited about AV- I'll have a chance to catch a snooze, read a book, talk with my mom without being distracted, all good. Once the technology is affordable, I'll definitely give it a go.

Before you can eliminate Rats caught in a Trap ... you first have to set a Trap.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Justin Roberts的更多文章

  • We are but mice in the grand scheme of climate change

    We are but mice in the grand scheme of climate change

    Does the climate change? Well of course it does nobody denies it, the contention is how much of the constant churn in…

    3 条评论
  • The Trouble with Volkswagen

    The Trouble with Volkswagen

    We have been hearing a lot about Volkswagen of late, mainly from the company itself . Most of the puffery surrounds its…

    13 条评论
  • A few casual deaths won't stop Ireland testing Autonomous Vehicles it seems.

    A few casual deaths won't stop Ireland testing Autonomous Vehicles it seems.

    Last week there was a cosy little conference Dublin where various speakers from the autonomous vehicle lobby got up and…

    6 条评论
  • Two Good Reasons Why Driverless Cars Are A Bad Bad Thing.

    Two Good Reasons Why Driverless Cars Are A Bad Bad Thing.

    First up is snow. Yes, the white stuff that falls from the skies and lies on roads making it difficult, but not always…

    2 条评论
  • Paris In Spring Can Mean Only One Thing.

    Paris In Spring Can Mean Only One Thing.

    Yes that's right, SIMA, or France's premier agricultural show. Purists might argue that the end of February isn't quite…

  • Brexit, an analogy

    Brexit, an analogy

    The arguments over Brexit have been raging over a year now with both sides claiming the ultimate expertise so I found…

  • A life less weird is hardly worth living.

    A life less weird is hardly worth living.

    This is Fidelle, a horse we kept for a while, I don't say owned for although we paid money to bring her into our lives…

  • The Poppy Question

    The Poppy Question

    This is the US cemetery at St-Laurent-sur-Mer, which stands above Omaha beach on the Normandy coast and in which are…

    6 条评论
  • Images from the ploughing.

    Images from the ploughing.

    Nearly a month after Ireland's premier agricultural show I have at last got round to sifting through the images and…

  • The Zen of Monochrome.

    The Zen of Monochrome.

    A scene from time, it could be any time, a cafe and band are not just of today neither are friends and companions…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了