Home inspections gone wrong- one example.

Home inspections are a crucial part of the home buying process , designed to ensure that the property is in good condition and free from significant defects. However, this well-intentioned step can sometimes spiral out of control, leading to unreasonable repair requests that have little to do with the functionality or safety of the home.

Take, for example, the case of a recent home sale that went off the rails due to a wildly excessive repair demand. After the inspection, the buyer's agent submitted a request for a staggering $37,000 in paint and stucco allowances. The kicker? The home was in excellent condition and didn’t need any such work. This request was not about fixing leaks, addressing electrical issues, or repairing a faulty roof—these were purely cosmetic changes that the buyer desired.

Home inspections are meant to uncover hidden issues that could affect the home's livability and safety, such as structural problems, plumbing leaks, or electrical hazards. They provide a layer of protection for buyers, ensuring that they are making a sound investment. However, the process can be misused. Some buyers, perhaps driven by their agents or a desire to customize the home to their tastes, submit repair requests that are excessive or unnecessary. These requests can range from minor cosmetic updates to complete overhauls that are more about personal preference than actual need.

Sellers have the ultimate say when it comes to repair requests. They can agree to all, some, or none of the items on the list. In the scenario mentioned above, the seller decided to say no to the $37,000 paint and stucco allowance. This decision was based on the fact that the requested repairs were unnecessary and did not impact the home's functionality or safety. As a result, the buyer chose to walk away from the deal. While this outcome can be disappointing for the seller, it’s often the best course of action when faced with unreasonable demands. Agreeing to such requests can set a precedent for further negotiations and complicate the transaction process.

To navigate unreasonable repair requests , sellers should focus on the inspection report’s findings that impact the home’s safety and functionality. Cosmetic issues or personal preferences of the buyer should not be given undue weight. Not all requests are unreasonable, and sellers can offer to fix legitimate issues or provide a credit for necessary repairs. Open communication and reasonable compromise can help keep the deal on track. However, if the requests are outlandish, sellers should feel empowered to say no. The primary goal is to ensure the home is safe and functional, not to cater to a buyer’s whims. Seeking professional advice from real estate agents can provide valuable insights and help navigate these negotiations. Their experience and market knowledge can help sellers make informed decisions.

Home inspections are a vital part of the real estate transaction, but they can sometimes lead to unrealistic repair requests that threaten to derail the process. Sellers must balance addressing legitimate concerns with resisting unreasonable demands. By staying grounded, negotiating wisely, and standing firm when necessary, sellers can navigate these challenges and successfully close the sale. In the case of the $37,000 paint and stucco allowance, the seller’s decision to refuse the request was both reasonable and justified. While the buyer walked away, the seller maintained their integrity and avoided setting a costly and unnecessary precedent. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure that the home is in good condition for its new owners without succumbing to unreasonable demands that have little to do with the property's actual needs.

?