Will Russian History Repeat Itself?

Will Russian History Repeat Itself?

In July 1914 the “Autocrat of Russia”, Tsar Nicholas mobilized the Russian army to support Serbia against perceived threats from Austro-Hungary.??The mobilization was all about the Imperial destiny of the Russian Empire and the misguided belief of the Tsar that he was the protector of the Slavic nations of Europe. On August 1 1914, the German Empire declared war on Russia.??At first the mighty Russian army had some quick victories and stormed into East Prussia and attacked territories of Germany’s ally the Austro-Hungarian Empire. However, the mighty Russia military soon proved to be a paper tiger and its offensives faltered and collapsed.??War weariness prevailed. There were many reasons for this including an incompetent Russian general staff that was beholden to the whims of one man – the Tsar - who made all decisions and who saw himself as a military expert, and the sycophantic corruption of elites who profited off the war. By the winter of 1916 / 1917 the Russian army was in tatters and was in full retreat.??Its logistics were so dismal that Russian soldiers often had one rifle for a platoon, had no winter uniforms and were starving.??Discontent of soldiers rose to dangerous levels which soon spread to the general population and riots across Russia ensued.??Even the exultations of the Russian Orthodox Church that the war was a holy and just war did not help improve the moral of the starving and soon to be revolutionary masses back in Russia. The mutiny of the Imperial garrison in Petrograd (St. Petersburg)??sparked the February Revolution that?undermined the?monarchy's authority. Eventually the Tsar and his son were left with no option but to abdicate. Imperial Russia imploded and a Russian Provisional government was formed which was powerless.??Anarchy reigned, the ex-Tsar was forced into internal exile in Yekaterinburg and was executed in July 1918.

On the war front there were nearly six million casualties who had died, were wounded or missing due to the actions of incompetent generals who had mobilized an army of disillusioned peasant soldiers who no longer wanted to fight the Tsar’s war. Most casualties were not the consequence of heroic battles but disease, starvation and the terrible impacts of winter on soldiers who were not only poorly armed but were also not supplied with winter uniforms.??The army that everyone in Europe had feared proved to impotent. The result was that by 1918 Russia was forced to seek a peace with the Central Powers and cede Imperial territories in Eastern Europe that included Poland, the Baltic States and Finland.??Instead of saving Serbia, the misguided Imperial vision of the “Russian Autocrat” destroyed Russia and saw newly independent nations rising on the ashes of its imperial ambitions.???

One has to ask the question – Does history repeat itself.??Maybe it does.

One can almost take the account above of the collapse of Imperial Russia, change the dates, and substitute the Tsar for Putin.??Will the winter of 2022/2023 see the collapse of the once feared Russian army which consists of unmotivated and ill equipped Russian rural-peasant “volunteers?”??Will the corruption of the war profiteering oligarchs manifest themselves with continuing logistic and supply failures because of the poor equipment that the Russian army has at hand? Will the uninspired and myopic military leadership of the new “Autocrat” result in a series of ongoing military setbacks and an eventual collapse of Russian forces in the Ukraine???Will the morally corrupt exaltations of the head of the Russian Orthodox Church save Mother Russia’s holy war?

It seems history might be repeating itself and things don’t look good for Russia.??The mothers of Russia and the nearly one million Russian men who have fled to avoid the draft will eventually fuel the rising discontent in Russia. When will the first “Petrograd” uprising occur??

In a recent Economist article (October 8th) the following observation was made.??“Ukraine’s military success is reshaping not just the war,??but also Russia.??I would have written that Russia’s military collapse is reshaping Russia. The war has proven that the Russian army is all bluster and no real substance,??that the Ukrainians do not share Putin’s vision of Russian led Pan-Slavism, and that Russia is running out of allies who can help it win.??The Russian Revolution of 1917 saw Russia’s total isolation and the loss of support from the allies in its fight against the Central Powers.??This week’s UN resolution condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine shows how isolated Putin has become.??The Russian wolves are circling. How long will the 70-year-old bear be able to fend them off?

Jerry M S.

Domestic and International Team Leader, Program/Project Management, Business and Operational, Expert in Private Sector Competitiveness - Development and Economic Growth, Infrastructure Sustainability

2 年

...and yet they remain! Five members – the USSR (now Russia), Republic of China (now People's Republic of China), the US, UK and France – have the status of permanent members and so have a veto on any vote before the Council. There is no mechanism to remove a permanent member of the Security Council written into the UN Charter. Charters can be changed.

回复
Mohammad Nazim

Education & Management Counselor

2 年

War doesn't resolve conflicts, nor does it bring peace to the territories gained through brutal force and mighty fire power. The world has witnessed how the war mongering leaders failed to hold the ground that they captured after trillions of dollars spent and thousands of lives lost, both of the fighting forces and the unarmed civilians. The net outcome had always been economic depression, political backlash, and social unrest in aggressive regimes whose leaders tried to go back in time and rewrite history. How unfortunate, the world is going through another misadventure, costs of which could be higher and globally more damaging than the Humankind had ever imagined, like the impact of Climate Change our wise leaders kept ignoring and downplaying.

John Sellers

Proptech | P3's | $30Bn PROJECT FINANCE in 30 countries | Innovation | Teamwork | Revenue Generation | Connecting dots | Avid Technology Innovator | Leadership By Example from The Front

2 年

Postscript Today's podcast was entitled "Ukraine at war: a menacing turn" Almost simultaneously CNN' breaking news was about Musk with little data. We got the scoop and how crucial Starlink has been to Ukraine's success. A real PPP???.

John Sellers

Proptech | P3's | $30Bn PROJECT FINANCE in 30 countries | Innovation | Teamwork | Revenue Generation | Connecting dots | Avid Technology Innovator | Leadership By Example from The Front

2 年

David. I imagine like me you subscribe to the Economist. Every two weeks or so, the Editor, Zanny, chairs a podcast featuring 3 of their journalists covering military and political matters dedicated to Ukraine. A 1 hr. podcast for subscribers. Usually 4:00 BST fridays.. The insights they get into are extraordinary. Essentially live news dealing with how many smart weapons Putin has left( not many), the decision tree to push the button for Armageddon, und so weiter. By comparison, cable news here might as well be covering an NFL game. It's also an extraordinary example of how Covid, and remote, has opened up real value added insights you can't get from just the written word. #Economist #theeconomist

要查看或添加评论,请登录

David Baxter的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了