Is history really a good indicator of the future?

Is history really a good indicator of the future?

Recently, during the COVID pandemic, many commentators have made references to "..if history is any indicator". This of course implies that the old adage "those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it" is valid.

Ironically, on the other hand, investors are warned that "past performance is no guarantee of future returns". Clearly this is true given that many companies that were rock stars decades ago no longer exist.

So, why is this dictum selectively used?

My take is adapted from one of my favourite books - "what got us here won't get us there" by Marshall Goldsmith.

I believe the world has changed (and will continue to evolve) dramatically and using the past to predict the future is a foolhardy exercise.

No alt text provided for this image

In the corporate context, industry dynamics change, the competitive landscape changes, technologies disrupt and customer preferences change.

Too often companies are so busy defending the status quo and unwilling to let go of the cash cow, that they don't see the writing on the wall and become obsolete.

As an example, a business I worked in was making huge revenues and profits of a product line geared to service copper telephony networks. We thought we were very far sighted as we tentatively adapted to fiber networks but completely missed the boat on wireless.

Correlation is too often mistaken for causation. History may be a good teacher but rarely a predictor.

Even in the case of behaviour, the phrase "a tiger cannot change it stripes"is often used to indicate that people are incapable of changing and past actions determine future behaviour, is questionable (though unfortunately people are rarely given an opportunity for redemption)

This applies to our personal lives as well. What worked for our parents rarely works for us and for sure will not work for our children.

In conclusion beware when you assume that what worked then will work now.

Adrian Zahra

Managing Director and Principal Consultant / Senior QP.

4 å¹´

Interesting take. However, I broadly believe Churchill to be correct. He was not talking about individual companies, technologies, peopke or even specific strategies. Churchill was interested in the broad stroke: the way people think and behave as groups: how they live together. These are traits that have been ingrained in us over millions of years of evolution. They don't change that much - hence Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs is still the basic concept underpinning modern marketing.

赞
回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ajay Nanavati的更多文章

  • To go or not to go - that is the question!

    To go or not to go - that is the question!

    Two recent news items regarding a) the attacks on Indian students in USA, UK & Australia and b) the increasing…

    1 条评论
  • Reflections on a fascinating journey

    Reflections on a fascinating journey

    Today as I enter my 69th year and the 10th year of my retirement, it's a good time to reflect on the decade gone by…

    14 条评论
  • Reflections on a personal journey

    Reflections on a personal journey

    Today as I enter my 69th year and the 10th year of my retirement, it's a good time to reflect on the decade gone by…

    15 条评论
  • Talent crunch - myth and reality

    Talent crunch - myth and reality

    Post the pandemic and more recently, there has been a LOT of chatter around how talent shortage could potentially…

    1 条评论
  • Earn the right to win - its not a gift

    Earn the right to win - its not a gift

    In recent months there has been CONSIDERABLE airtime being given to the challenges the startup ecosystem is facing…

  • Built to last - journey of an MNC in India

    Built to last - journey of an MNC in India

    Today is the 35th anniversary of the "formal" start of 3M in India. It seems like just yesterday.

    27 条评论
  • Big mistakes - big learning's

    Big mistakes - big learning's

    As we enter a new year, rather than make resolutions I decided to reflect on some of the bloopers I've made over my…

  • Agility and scale - is there a trade-off?

    Agility and scale - is there a trade-off?

    The announcement by 3M about spinning off about a fourth of the company into a stand-alone business and Novartis…

    2 条评论
  • Dissent ≠ disloyalty - a core tenet of good governance

    Dissent ≠ disloyalty - a core tenet of good governance

    In the increasingly polarised world we live in, dissent is too often perceived as disloyalty. Unfortunately this is…

  • CEO tenure and company performance

    CEO tenure and company performance

    The recent news about US pension giant Calpers pushing for Warren Buffet to be replaced has reignited the issue of…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了