The High-Risk Checklist Part 4: What Risk Gear Are You In? Are You Shifting Them or Grinding Them?
Christopher Stone
Technology Executive | COO | Managing Director |Member of the Board of Directors | VC
In our concluding article of this series, we aim to wrap everything up and provide a cohesive framework for your checklist to help you navigate high-risk decisions within your organisation. By assessing this checklist, you'll be better positioned to determine the current "risk gear" your organisation is in and how to effectively transition to the next gear.
Understanding Your Risk Gear
Drawing from my extensive experience in both high and low-risk decision-making at the executive level, I've discerned that for organisations to ascertain which risk gear they are in, they will first consider three primary levels of risk appetite: Aggressive, moderate, and conservative. They will then classify the impact with these indicators on 4 key lenses;
Recapping our Series Journey and our High Risk Checklist
As we move forward lets first look back and summarise the foundational knowledge we've amassed from our prior discussions and use it to look at the 3 key things needed on your High-Risk Checklist:
The Risk Bell Curve - Managing the Chance of a Negative Impact
Now that we've established a foundation of the indicators for determining what gear your organisation is in and outlined the key elements of our high risk checklist, it's opportune to introduce the concept of the "risk bell curve."
The risk bell curve serves as a graphical representation, showcasing risk against its mean probability of occurrence. This visual tool provides a tangible way to appreciate and assess the spread and likelihood of risks.
While the possibility of a negative outcome is an inherent aspect of any risk-taking endeavour – and should, in many respects, be embraced as part of organisational growth – complications arise when multiple high-risk scenarios converge simultaneously. This overlap of risks, often referred to as 'compounding risk', provides a compelling argument against recklessly advancing through the risk gears. Imagine, for instance, one scenario with risks distributed evenly and another where risks compound. The latter situation significantly challenges the effective management of risk.
The above diagram illustrates while the negative impacts of an isolated high-risk decision might be seamlessly absorbed by an organisation, when these decisions overlap or run in parallel, the cumulative impact amplifies considerably. While the average risk of negative impact stays the same, the low chance and more concernedly the high chance possibilities increase exponentially.
Concluding Thoughts
With a clearer perception of risk essentials, risk perspectives, and the significance of recognising your organisational risk position, you're now better equipped to navigate high-stakes decisions.
As we close this series, I extend my gratitude for joining me on this exploration of risk.
I genuinely hope this has sparked thoughtful reflection. My aspiration is to empower today's leaders to harness risk as an ally rather than a foe. In wrapping up, remember: risk, when understood and managed correctly, can be exciting, predictable, and fundamental in its essence.