The High Cost of Employee Disengagement

Introduction

Employee engagement is a critical factor in organizational success. Engaged employees are passionate about their work, committed to their company's mission and values, and motivated to go the extra mile. They bring their best selves to work each day, pouring discretionary effort into their jobs.

In contrast, disengaged employees are emotionally disconnected from their work and company. They may be physically present but psychologically absent, doing the bare minimum to get by and collect a paycheck. Some actively disengaged employees may even undermine what their engaged coworkers accomplish through negativity and disruptive behaviors.

The cost of employee disengagement is staggering. According to Gallup, actively disengaged employees cost the U.S. $450 billion to $550 billion per year in lost productivity. Disengagement also leads to higher turnover, absenteeism, safety incidents, quality defects, and lower profitability and shareholder returns.

This article will explore the high price of employee disengagement, examining the scope of the problem, root causes, impacts on organizations, and strategies to boost engagement. It will present research, metrics, and case studies to illustrate the real-world costs and offer evidence-based solutions.

The Scope of Disengagement

Despite the clear business case for engagement, employee disengagement remains pervasive. Gallup has been tracking U.S. employee engagement since 2000. In 2021, their research found that just 34% of employees were engaged, while 16% were actively disengaged. The remaining 50% were "not engaged" - psychologically unattached and putting little energy into their work.

Globally, the numbers are even more dire. Gallup's 2022 State of the Global Workplace report found that only 21% of employees worldwide are engaged at work, while 33% are thriving in their overall wellbeing. Regionally, engagement is highest in the U.S. and Canada (33%) and lowest in South Asia (14%).

Disengagement cuts across industries, job roles, and demographic groups. However, some populations are at higher risk. Front-line and blue-collar workers, who often have less autonomy and development opportunities, tend to have lower engagement than knowledge workers. Younger employees also tend to be less engaged than their older colleagues.

The COVID-19 pandemic has further compounded the challenge of disengagement. Gallup found that U.S. employee engagement dropped in 2021 for the first time in a decade.6 Factors like remote work, job insecurity, homeschooling demands, and mental health strain made it harder for many to stay motivated and connected.

However, not all organizations suffered declines. Gallup found that engagement actually rose in 2020 by two percentage points at companies that made employee engagement a strategic priority prior to the pandemic. Their cultures of engagement provided ballast during the storm.

Measuring the Cost

The impacts of disengagement are both pervasive and costly. However, calculating an exact price tag is complex, as disengagement has ripple effects across productivity, retention, customer metrics, and ultimately profitability.

One meta-analysis by Gallup estimated that disengaged employees cost organizations 18% of their annual salary in lost productivity.For a company with 10,000 employees and an average salary of $50,000, this translates to $90 million per year.

Engaged employees, on the other hand, can drive outsized value. Gallup found that business units with highly engaged teams achieve:

10% higher customer loyalty/engagement

23% higher profitability

18% higher productivity (sales)

14% higher productivity (production records and evaluations)

18% to 43% lower turnover

64% lower safety incidents (accidents)

28% lower shrinkage (theft)

41% lower absenteeism

58% fewer patient safety incidents

40% fewer quality incidents (defects)

In one study of 192 organizations, Gallup found that companies with highly engaged teams outperformed their peers by 147% in earnings per share.

Beyond productivity, disengagement fuels costly voluntary turnover. Work Institute's 2020 Retention Report estimated that a median turnover cost is about one-third of the worker's annual earnings.If an employee earning a $60,000 salary quits, that's a $20,000 hit from recruitment, training, and lost productivity.

Disengagement can also manifest as absenteeism, when employees miss work because of burnout, frustration, or apathy.Disengaged employees take an average of 3.5 more sick days per year than their engaged counterparts, costing U.S. companies an estimated $84 billion annually.

Even when disengaged employees show up, there can be a contagion effect - their negativity and cynicism rubbing off on others. Gallup found that companies pay a "disengagement tax" when actively disengaged workers are surrounded by similarly disaffected colleagues. Actively disengaged employees with the lowest engagement scores cost the U.S. economy nearly $400 billion in lost productivity per year - more than 75% of the total cost of disengagement.

Case Studies

Employee disengagement manifests differently across companies and industries, but the costs are universally high. The following mini case studies highlight the scope of the problem and effective countermeasures.

Case #1: Declining Engagement in Manufacturing

Company: Large industrial manufacturer

Challenge: Between 2019-2021, this company saw engagement decline from 33% engaged to just 25% engaged. Meanwhile, active disengagement rose from 17% to 22%. Managers reported more quality defects, safety incidents, and absenteeism.

Root Causes: Layoffs and furloughs during an economic downturn bred fear and uncertainty. Cost-cutting measures reduced already limited development opportunities. Front-line supervisors lacked training to have meaningful stay conversations with at-risk employees.

Interventions:

Instituted weekly team huddles to improve communication and connection

Provided resilience and change management training for all employees

Upskilled front-line supervisors on coaching and career conversations

Created a tuition reimbursement program and internal gig marketplace to build skills

Results: One year later, engagement rose to 31%, and quality, safety, and absenteeism metrics all improved. While still a work in progress, these interventions helped stop the downward slide.

Case #2: Transforming Engagement in Healthcare

Company: Regional hospital system

Challenge: Engagement had plateaued around 30% for several years, well below industry benchmarks. Patient satisfaction scores were slipping, and voluntary nurse turnover reached 28% annually at an estimated cost of $50,000 per departure.

Root Causes: Lack of career development and advancement opportunities; pay not keeping up with market rates; poor work-life balance and high stress, especially in COVID-19 units.

Interventions:

Raised base compensation to 60th percentile of market

Created clinical career ladder and leadership development programs

Improved staffing ratios and scheduling flexibility

Implemented a "culture of recognition" with meaningful incentives

Provided mental health resources and resiliency training

Results: Over two years, engagement rose to 41%. Turnover dropped to 21%, saving an estimated $4.2 million per year. Key patient experience metrics like likelihood to recommend also rose significantly.

Case #3: Engaging the Front Line in Retail

Company: National big box retailer

Challenge: Despite a highly engaged corporate workforce, front-line engagement scores consistently lagged 10-15 points behind, and turnover was nearly 60% for store associates.

Root Causes: Lack of autonomy and empowerment for front-line workers. "Command and control" leadership style. Pay perceived as noncompetitive for physically demanding work. Limited connections between senior leaders and front line.

Interventions:

Raised starting wage to $15/hour and improved benefits

Instituted "open door" feedback sessions between front-line workers and executives

Rolled out servant leadership training for all people managers

Gave store teams more control over visual merchandising, hiring, community giving

Created "employee experience council" to continuously improve the associate lifecycle

Results: Front-line engagement rose by 8 points in one year and 12 points over two years, now nearly at parity with corporate. Turnover dropped by 10%. Customer satisfaction scores also jumped as associates were more present and attentive.

Driving Engagement

While the causes of disengagement are multifaceted, the solutions inevitably involve better management. Gallup has found that managers account for at least 70% of the variance in team engagement. Great managers help team members unleash their talents, make meaningful progress, and feel cared about as people.

Gallup has also identified five actionable strategies that can dramatically improve engagement:

Hold managers accountable: Require every manager to have meaningful discussions with each team member about their role, progress, and relationship. Build engagement into performance expectations and reviews.

Connect engagement to business outcomes: Help leaders and managers understand how engagement impacts their specific KPIs and goals. Quantify the opportunity cost of disengagement.

Choose the right managers: The best managers have a rare combination of innate talents and learned skills. Organizations must select managers with the right attributes and invest in their development. Empathy, communication, and adaptability are key traits.

Focus on strengths: When employees have the opportunity to do what they do best each day, they are more likely to be engaged. Train managers to spot and leverage team members' unique strengths.

Meet essential needs: Engaged employees share some basic requirements: knowing what's expected of them, having the right materials and equipment, having the opportunity to do what they do best, feeling cared about, and believing their opinions count. Hold managers accountable for meeting these needs.

In addition to better management, organizations can hardwire engagement into the employee experience through practices like:

Meaningful onboarding: The first days and weeks on the job are critical for engagement. Effective onboarding goes beyond transactional paperwork to inspire purpose, forge connections, and jumpstart productivity. Workday found that employees who felt their onboarding was highly effective were 18 times more likely to feel highly committed to their organization.

Continuous listening: From annual surveys to pulse polls to unsolicited feedback, organizations need robust listening systems to measure and improve the employee experience. Microsoft evolved its approach during the pandemic to include a daily pulse survey in addition to quarterly census surveys. The high-frequency insights helped managers respond to emerging needs and concerns.

Recognition: Appreciation is a fundamental human need. Making recognition frequent, specific, and authentic can boost engagement. Deloitte found that organizations with sophisticated recognition programs are 12 times more likely to have strong business outcomes.

Inclusive benefits: Innovative companies are expanding benefits to meet the diverse needs of today's workforce. Employee assistance programs, mental health days, paid parental leave, and flexible schedules can help employees bring their best selves to work.

Growth opportunities: LinkedIn's 2022 Global Talent Trends report found that employees who feel their skills are not being put to good use in their current job are 10 times more likely to look for a new job.Providing robust learning resources, mentoring programs, and internal mobility options can keep employees growing and engaged.

Conclusion

Employee disengagement exacts a massive toll on organizations, sapping productivity, eroding retention, and ultimately hurting profitability. Actively disengaged employees alone cost U.S. companies up to $550 billion per year.

But amidst this challenge lies incredible opportunity. By making engagement a strategic priority - through better management, robust listening systems, and an employee experience that meets core needs - organizations can unleash the full potential of their people.

The path to engagement is not always easy, but the rewards are immense. Companies with highly engaged teams achieve better customer metrics, higher productivity and profitability, lower turnover, and fewer safety and quality incidents. In an era of intense competition and continuous disruption, engagement has become an existential issue. The organizations that will thrive in the decades ahead will be those that win in the workplace first.

References

Harter, J. (2019). Employee Engagement on the Rise in the U.S. Gallup.com. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/266822/employee-engagement-rise.aspx

Harter, J. (2022). U.S. Employee Engagement Drops for First Year in a Decade. Gallup.com. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/352949/employee-engagement-drops-first-year-decade.aspx

Gallup. (2022). State of the Global Workplace 2022 Report. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace-2022-report.aspx

Dvorak, N., & Nelson, B. (2016). Engagement for All: The High Cost of Disengagement. Gallup. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/236294/engagement-cost-disengagement.aspx

Robinson, J. (2022). What Young Employees Want Is Good News for Your Business. Gallup.com. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/358346/young-employees-good-news-business.aspx

Harter, J. (2021). Historic Drop in Employee Engagement Follows Record Rise. Gallup.com. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/352938/historic-drop-employee-engagement-follows-record-rise.aspx

Harter, J. (2021). U.S. Employee Engagement Rises Following Wild 2020. Gallup.com. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/352174/employee-engagement-rises-following-wild-2020.aspx

Reilly, R. (2014). Five Ways to Improve Employee Engagement Now. Gallup Business Journal. https://news.gallup.com/businessjournal/166667/five-ways-improve-employee-engagement.aspx

Gallup. (2010). The State of the American Workplace: 2008-2010. Gallup, Inc.

Work Institute. (2020). 2020 Retention Report: Trends, Reasons & Recommendations. https://info.workinstitute.com/retentionreport2020

Gallup. (2022). What Is Employee Burnout? Gallup.com. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/237059/employee-burnout.aspx

SHRM. (2017). New SHRM Research on Paid Leave Policies. https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/benefits/pages/new-shrm-research-on-paid-leave-policies.aspx

Crabtree, S. (2013). Worldwide, 13% of Employees Are Engaged at Work. Gallup.com. https://news.gallup.com/poll/165269/worldwide-employees-engaged-work.aspx

NSI Nursing Solutions, Inc. (2021). 2021 NSI National Health Care Retention & RN Staffing Report. https://www.nsinursingsolutions.com/Documents/Library/NSI_National_Health_Care_Retention_Report.pdf

Wells, L. (2018). 3 Strategies Every Retailer Should Deploy to Engage Employees. Gallup.com. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/231584/strategies-every-retailer-deploy-engage-employees.aspx

Beck, R., & Harter, J. (2014). Managers Account for 70% of Variance in Employee Engagement. Gallup Business Journal. https://news.gallup.com/businessjournal/182792/managers-account-variance-employee-engagement.aspx

Royal, M., & Harter, J. (2020). 5 Strategies to Improve Manager Engagement. Gallup.com. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/323573/strategies-improve-manager-engagement.aspx

Workday. (2020). Evolving Candidate and Employee Experience: A Workday Study. https://forms.workday.com/en-us/other/candidate-employee-experience-study/form.html

Microsoft. (2022). 2022 Work Trend Index: Great Expectations: Making Hybrid Work Work. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/worklab/work-trend-index

Deloitte. (2019). The social enterprise at work: Paradox as a path forward. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/human-capital-trends/2020/employee-recognition-supporting-human-workforce.html

LinkedIn. (2022). Global Talent Trends 2022. https://business.linkedin.com/talent-solutions/global-talent-trends