The Hierarchy of Excellence: Achieving Mastery in Three Levels

Excellence is a multifaceted concept that encompasses a wide range of attributes, from technical proficiency to the ability to adapt and innovate. In the context of various fields, the pursuit of excellence can be viewed through a three-level hierarchy, where each level represents a distinct set of characteristics and achievements.

At the foundational level, sustainability-focused BI ensures that organizations have a solid understanding of their environmental, social, and governance performance metrics.

At the adaptive level, sustainability-focused BI enables organizations to identify emerging sustainability trends, develop innovative solutions, and stay ahead of regulatory and stakeholder expectations.

At the expert level, sustainability-focused BI provides a deep, holistic view of an organization's sustainability performance, allowing for strategic decision-making that balances financial, environmental, and social considerations. (Hazen et al., 2016) (Alshehhi et al., 2018) (Olson, 2006) (Stainer & Stainer, 2008)

This hierarchical approach to excellence is analogous to Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, where lower-level needs must be satisfied before higher-level needs can be addressed. (Marshall & Toffel, 2004)

At the foundational level, excellence is defined by the mastery of fundamental skills and knowledge. This level is characterized by a deep understanding of the core principles and techniques within a particular domain, as well as the ability to consistently produce high-quality work that meets established standards. Individuals at this level have a strong command of the basics, allowing them to reliably deliver results and serve as a reliable resource for their organization or community.

As one ascends the hierarchy, the next level of excellence is marked by the ability to adapt and innovate. Experts at this level are not content with simply maintaining the status quo; they are driven to push the boundaries of their field, seeking out new challenges and opportunities for growth. These individuals are adept at identifying and addressing emerging trends, and they possess the creativity and problem-solving skills to develop novel solutions that enhance the overall quality of their work.

At the pinnacle of the hierarchy lies the highest level of excellence, which is characterized by a profound and nuanced understanding of the intricacies of one's field. These individuals are not only masters of their craft but also possess a deep, intuitive grasp of the complexities that underlie their work. They are able to anticipate and navigate the most challenging scenarios, drawing upon a vast repertoire of knowledge and experience to deliver exceptional results.

Achieving excellence at any level requires a sustained commitment to deliberate practice, feedback, and continuous learning. As experts in various fields have noted, the path to excellence is often marked by a relentless pursuit of improvement, a willingness to embrace challenges, and a deep passion for one's craft (Ericsson, 2008) (Sprung et al., 2015) (Khasawneh, 2020) (Zairi, 1999).

Level 1: Business Intelligence (BI)

This is the overarching purpose of BI: to provide actionable insights to support strategic decision-making. It's about using data to understand the big picture and make informed choices about the future of the business.

BI can be used to analyze a wide range of business data, such as financial performance, customer behavior, market trends, and operational efficiency (Rouhani & Zamenian, 2021) (Ragazou et al., 2023).

Level 2: Domain-Specific Intelligence

Here, BI is narrowed down to specific areas of business operations.

• Sustainability Intelligence (Sustainability Framework / ESG Compliance): This domain focuses on analyzing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data to measure and improve sustainability performance.
• System Intelligence (IT Department): This domain leverages data from IT systems to optimize system performance, identify bottlenecks, and predict failures.
• Project/Operational Intelligence (HoD): This domain uses data from project management and operational systems to track progress, identify risks, and improve efficiency.

Level 3: Specific Applications (Department Activities)

At this level, we delve into the practical applications of BI within specific departments or areas of business. It's about addressing concrete challenges or opportunities.

• Sustainability Intelligence: This focuses on using data to measure and improve environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. Applications include carbon footprint analysis, supply chain sustainability assessment, and ESG reporting.
• System Intelligence (IT Department): This leverages IT systems data to optimize system performance, identify bottlenecks, and predict failures. Applications include network performance monitoring, server capacity planning, and IT service management.
• Project/Operational Intelligence (HoD): This uses data from project management and operational systems to track progress, identify risks, and improve efficiency. Applications include project portfolio management, resource allocation, and operational risk assessment.

By transitioning through these three levels of excellence, organizations can build a comprehensive BI capability that serves their strategic, operational, and technical needs.

P5 Framework developed by GPM Global recommends that Sustainability is integrated in every system, process and deliverable. (Liakh, 2021)

Integration + Optimization + Innovation = Excellence

In summary, the hierarchy of excellence in BI encompasses three levels: 1) the overarching purpose of providing actionable insights, 2) the domain-specific applications of BI, and 3) the specific use cases within those domains.

Product: Analyzing market demand, competitor analysis, and customer preferences to develop a competitive product offering. Specific examples of how each element can be integrated into business strategy:

Process: Optimizing construction processes, managing the supply chain, and implementing quality control measures.

People: Recruiting and training skilled personnel, ensuring adequate resources, and maintaining a positive work culture.

Planet: Incorporating sustainable building practices, minimizing environmental impact, and complying with local regulations.

Prosperity: Conducting financial analysis, assessing profitability, and developing a long-term growth strategy.

P5 and the department can be linked to its focus.

? Sustainability Intelligence: This focuses on using data to measure and improve environmental, social, and governance performance.

? System Intelligence: This leverages IT systems data to optimize system performance, identify bottlenecks, and predict failures.

? Project/Operational Intelligence: This uses data from project management and operational systems to track progress, identify risks, and improve efficiency.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the hierarchy of excellence in business intelligence can be divided into three distinct levels:

1) The overarching purpose of BI, which is to provide actionable insights to support strategic decision-making. (Stefanovi?, 2014)(Montero & Lind, 2020)(Maleki & Sabet, 2022)

2) Domain-specific applications of BI, such as sustainability intelligence, system intelligence, and project/operational intelligence.

3) The specific use cases within those domains, which address concrete challenges and opportunities.

The P5 framework can be used to create a well-rounded and sustainable business strategy by integrating considerations for products, processes, people, the planet, and prosperity (Badria et al., 2021) (Stainer & Stainer, 2008).

The hierarchy of excellence in business intelligence reflects a progression from mastering fundamental skills to adapting and innovating, and ultimately achieving a profound understanding of one's field. (Yuzgenc & Aydemir, 2023) (Stainer & Stainer, 2008) (Rowley et al., 2012) (Badria et al., 2021). Sustainability is a key concern for businesses at all levels, as they strive to minimize environmental impact, address social issues, and maintain strong governance practices. The P5 framework provides a strategic planning tool to integrate these sustainability considerations into a holistic business strategy, with the pyramid structure representing the hierarchical relationship between the five key elements: product, process, people, planet, and prosperity. (Stainer & Stainer, 2008) (Badria et al., 2021) (Rowley et al., 2012) (Handayani et al., 2020)

References

1. Alshehhi, A., Nobanee, H., & Khare, N. (2018). The Impact of Sustainability Practices on Corporate Financial Performance: Literature Trends and Future Research Potential. In Sustainability (Vol. 10, Issue 2, p. 494). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020494
2. Badria, N., Sukoharsono, E. G., & Purwanti, L. (2021). Business sustainability and pentuple bottom line: Building the hierarchical pyramid of the pentuple bottom line. In International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478) (Vol. 10, Issue 3, p. 123). ümit Hac?o?lu. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1156
3. Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Deliberate Practice and Acquisition of Expert Performance: A General Overview. In Academic Emergency Medicine (Vol. 15, Issue 11, p. 988). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00227.x
4. Handayani, M., Baridwan, Z., Irianto, G., & Rosidi. (2020). Transformation Corporate Social Responsibility Towards Industrial Revolution 4.0: Strategy and Challenges. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201021.011
5. Hazen, B. T., Skipper, J. B., Ezell, J. D., & Boone, C. A. (2016). Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain sustainability: A theory-driven research agenda. In Computers & Industrial Engineering (Vol. 101, p. 592). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.06.030
6. Khasawneh, L. A. (2020). Elements of the Graphic Designer’s Excellence in a Competitive Business Environment: Analytical Study. In Scholars Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences (Vol. 8, Issue 7, p. 337). https://doi.org/10.36347/sjahss.2020.v08i07.001
7. Liakh, O. (2021). Accountability through Sustainability Data Governance: Reconfiguring Reporting to Better Account for the Digital Acceleration. In Sustainability (Vol. 13, Issue 24, p. 13814). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413814
8. Maleki, R., & Sabet, E. (2022). Business Intelligence Analysis in Small and Medium Enterprises. In International journal of Innovation in Marketing Elements (Vol. 2, Issue 1, p. 1). https://doi.org/10.59615/ijime.2.1.1
9. Marshall, J., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Framing the Elusive Concept of Sustainability: A Sustainability Hierarchy [Review of Framing the Elusive Concept of Sustainability: A Sustainability Hierarchy]. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(3), 673. American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/es040394k
10. Montero, J. N., & Lind, M. (2020). Determining Business Intelligence Usage Success. In International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology (Vol. 12, Issue 6, p. 45). https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsit.2020.12604
11. Olson, E. G. (2006). Not by technology alone: sustaining winning strategies. In Journal of Business Strategy (Vol. 27, Issue 4, p. 33). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660610701003
12. Ragazou, K., Passas, I., Garefalakis, A., & Zopounidis, C. (2023). Business intelligence model empowering SMEs to make better decisions and enhance their competitive advantage. In Discover Analytics (Vol. 1, Issue 1). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44257-022-00002-3
13. Rouhani, S., & Zamenian, S. (2021). An Architectural Framework for Healthcare Dashboards Design [Review of An Architectural Framework for Healthcare Dashboards Design]. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2021, 1. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1964054
14. Rowley, C., Saha, J. M., & Ang, D. (2012). The depths and heights of business sustainability. In Elsevier eBooks (p. 29). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-84334-634-0.50002-0
15. Sprung, C. L., Cohen, R., & Marini, J. J. (2015). Excellence in Intensive Care Medicine [Review of Excellence in Intensive Care Medicine]. Critical Care Medicine, 44(1), 202. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000001435
16. Stainer, A., & Stainer, L. (2008). Environmental and productivity management: the business sustainability syndrome. In International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management (Vol. 10, Issue 1, p. 56). Inderscience Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijetm.2009.021578
17. Stefanovi?, N. (2014). Proactive Supply Chain Performance Management with Predictive Analytics. In The Scientific World JOURNAL (Vol. 2014, p. 1). Hindawi Publishing Corporation. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/528917
18. Yuzgenc, I. U., & Aydemir, E. (2023). Sustainable ERP Systems: A Green Perspective. In International Conference on Pioneer and Innovative Studies (Vol. 1, p. 533). https://doi.org/10.59287/icpis.886
19. Zairi, M. (1999). Managing excellence: leadership. In The TQM Journal (Vol. 11, Issue 4, p. 215). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544789910277288