The Hidden Costs of Cutting Training: Ensuring Survival in High-Risk Environments
Ron Butcher
Operational Safety Consultant | Maritime, Construction & Energy Expert | Fractional Safety Leadership | OSHA/ISO Compliance Specialist | Veteran | California - Nevada - Arizona - Canada | Remote & Travel Ready
In any high-risk environment, the first priority isn’t safety—it’s survival. Without ensuring survival, safety is just an illusion. And the truth is, survival isn’t just about following processes and procedures; it’s about having the right tools, training, and resources at hand when things go wrong. This is where bounded rationality comes into play. It’s the resources workers have in that moment, in the midst of high pressure and unpredictability, that ultimately decide whether they’ll make it through safely.
Think of bounded rationality as the set of tools and knowledge available to your team when they’re out there doing the work. They don’t have unlimited time to process every option or consult every manual. Instead, they rely on the training and information you’ve given them beforehand. The more comprehensive and practical that training is, the better equipped they are to make quick, smart decisions when the stakes are high. It’s the resources they’ve gained through performance-based learning that fill in the gaps left by errors and omissions in processes, procedures, and policies.
Here’s why this matters: context is everything. No policy or procedure can predict every variable your workers will face on the job. Training that mirrors real-world situations prepares them to adapt when things inevitably change. Without that, they’re left navigating a complex environment with only the most basic, generic knowledge, and that’s when mistakes happen.
Then there’s local rationality—the idea that workers make decisions based on what they see and know right there in the moment. If they haven’t been properly trained, their decision-making is limited, leading to gaps in judgment. But when they’ve been given the right tools and training, they can think on their feet and make decisions that align with survival—even when things don’t go according to plan.
领英推荐
But survival isn’t just an individual effort; it’s a team game. Collective rationality reminds us that in high-risk environments, no one succeeds alone. Teams need to operate as a cohesive unit, with every member knowing how to cover for each other, communicate under pressure, and adapt as a group. Cutting training weakens that team dynamic, and suddenly you have individuals working in silos, which leads to breakdowns in communication and execution. Proper, scenario-based training strengthens the team’s ability to work together seamlessly when the pressure is on.
When you cut training budgets or rely on one-size-fits-all computer modules, you’re removing the safety net that workers rely on. The training they receive isn’t just about compliance—it’s about filling the gaps that processes and procedures can’t cover. It’s about giving them the tools they need to adapt when things go wrong, because in high-risk environments, something always will.
The bottom line? If you’re serious about improving safety, you need to prioritize survival. Performance-based training is an investment in that survival, arming your workers with the practical skills and knowledge they need to handle the unexpected. If you want to learn more about how this approach can strengthen your safety processes without blowing up your budgets or bids, reach out to me . We can build a system that doesn’t just check boxes but ensures that when the pressure’s on, your team is ready to survive—and thrive.
How to Get Your Boss's Boss to Understand by Communicating with FINESSE | Solutions for people, facilities, infrastructure, and the environment.
1 个月“survival isn’t just an individual effort; it’s a team game”. Good post