Hidden Challenges in Cosmetic Product Stability - Impact on Cosmetic Claims

In the ever-evolving field of cosmetic science, ensuring product efficacy while maintaining stability remains a paramount challenge.

Concerns have been raised by consumer groups who claim certain products do not deliver the promised results, and sunscreens are always heavily scrutinised this time of year as we approach summer holiday season. These allegations often spotlight the discrepancies between physical and chemical stability versus biochemical instability.

This weeks column aims to shed light on the multifaceted issues surrounding cosmetic product stability and provides actionable solutions. It also calls for more rigorous and transparent testing methods, ultimately fostering better communication and trust among all stakeholders in the cosmetic industry. As we delve deeper, it’s essential to unravel these complexities and propose robust solutions.

Understanding the Stability Spectrum

Cosmetic products are meticulously formulated to remain stable under various conditions. Physical stability encompasses the product's appearance, texture, and phase separation over time, while chemical stability focuses on the preservation of the active ingredients' integrity and concentration. Despite rigorous stability testing, biochemical instability can still occur, leading to diminished efficacy. This instability often arises from the degradation of active compounds when exposed to environmental factors or interactions within the product matrix.

Key Factors Considered in Stability Testing

Physical Stability - Observing changes in appearance, color, odor, texture, and phase separation.

Chemical Stability - Monitoring the concentration of active ingredients and potential degradation products.

Microbiological Stability - Ensuring that the product remains free from microbial contamination over time.

Packaging Compatibility - Assessing interactions between the formulation and its packaging, including potential leaching or absorption of ingredients.

What’s missing? Biochemical stability!

Consumer Group Findings: A Wake-Up Call?

Consumer groups such as Which? and the Stiftung Warentest, have played a pivotal role in highlighting product performance issues. However, their findings sometimes reveal a gap between laboratory test results and real-world application. It's crucial to scrutinise these discrepancies to identify where our methodologies might fall short. For instance, a cream might show perfect stability in a controlled environment but fail to perform due to unforeseen interactions on the skin.

Regulatory Compliance vs. Biochemical Stability

While the EU Cosmetic Regulation mandates thorough stability testing to ensure safety, these tests may not fully account for biochemical stability. The regulation focuses on ensuring that products do not pose any health risks under normal use conditions, but it does not always address the subtle biochemical changes that can affect product efficacy.

Efficacy Testing on Fully Stabilised Formulations vs. Pilot Batches

Pros

• Accurate Representation: Testing on fully stabilised formulations ensures that the efficacy results reflect the true performance of the final product as it will be experienced by consumers.
• Regulatory Confidence: Regulatory bodies and consumers have greater confidence in claims substantiation when the product tested is fully stable.
• Long-term Performance: Provides insights into the long-term performance of the product, ensuring that it remains effective throughout its shelf life.
• Speed to Market: Conducting efficacy tests on pilot batches can significantly speed up the product development process, allowing for quicker market entry.
• Cost-Effective: Reduces initial testing costs, which can be beneficial for small or start-up companies with limited budgets.

Cons

• Time-Consuming: Stability testing to achieve full stabilisation can be time-consuming, delaying the overall product development timeline.
• Increased Costs: stability testing periods can increase the costs associated with product development and testing.
• Potential Inaccuracy: Pilot batches may not accurately reflect the final formulation, leading to discrepancies in efficacy results once the product is fully stabilised
• Regulatory Risk: There is a higher risk of regulatory scrutiny or consumer complaints if the final product does not meet the efficacy claims substantiated by pilot batch testing.

Bridging the Gap: Some Proactive Solutions

1. Comprehensive Stability Testing - Incorporating both physical and biochemical stability testing can provide a more complete picture of product stability. This includes testing for ingredient degradation and interaction under various conditions.

2. Advanced Formulation Techniques - Utilizing advanced formulation techniques, such as encapsulation or the use of stabilising agents, can help protect sensitive ingredients from degradation and interaction. Employing cutting-edge analytical techniques to detect minor degradations and interactions that traditional methods might miss. This can help predict and mitigate biochemical instability before the product reaches consumers.

3. Iterative Testing - Conduct iterative stability and efficacy testing throughout the development process. Starting with pilot batches and progressively moving to fully stabilised formulations can help balance speed and accuracy.Integrating real-world usage scenarios into stability testing protocols can provide more accurate insights. This includes varying environmental conditions, different application methods, and extended duration of use studies.

4. Real-time and Accelerated Testing - Combining real-time stability testing with accelerated testing methods can provide quicker insights into long-term stability while ensuring that formulations meet the necessary biochemical stability requirements.

5. Collaborative Approach - Working closely with suppliers and packaging manufacturers can help identify potential stability issues early in the development process, allowing for proactive formulation adjustments.

6. Consumer Education - Educating consumers more widely on proper storage and usage can significantly impact product efficacy! Simple guidelines on how to store products away from heat and light, or advice on the correct amount to use, can make a noticeable difference.

7. Scrutinising Consumer Group Testing - While consumer group testing holds value, the transparency of their methodologies is often questioned. Are their testing conditions reflective of typical consumer use? Do they account for variables such as individual skin types and environmental factors? What efficacy methods and instrumentation do they actually use? Are they cost constrained and go for cheap-n'-not-so-cheerful studies providing inaccurate data? Greater transparency and standardisation in consumer testing methods would not only enhance credibility but also provide more actionable insights for manufacturers.

8. Collaborative Transparency - Encouraging an even more open dialogue between cosmetic scientists, regulatory bodies, and consumer groups can lead to more comprehensive testing standards. Collaborative efforts in refining methodologies and sharing data can bridge the knowledge gap and ensure products meet the highest standards of efficacy and safety.

Impact on Cosmetic Claims and Compliance

The issues and solutions discussed here have direct implications on cosmetic claims and compliance. As we address the discrepancies between stability and efficacy, our claims must be backed by robust, real-world data. Enhanced stability testing and transparency not only strengthen our claims but also ensure compliance with regulatory standards. By proactively improving our testing protocols and formulations, we can mitigate risks associated with non-compliance and false advertising claims, thereby protecting our brands and fostering consumer trust.

For more Claims Insights subscribe to this newsletter

Also follow my monthly Claims column with EuroCosmetics Magazine here:https://www.eurocosmetics-mag.com/cosmetic-claims/ as well as a monthly article with BEAUTYSTREAMS: https://beautystreams.com

For a comprehensive look at Claims Development and Claims & The Consumer the second edition of Help! I'm Covered in Adjectives is available from all Amazon book outlets internationally.