Here's the #1 Mistake Companies Make When Letting Employees Work From Anywhere
Robert Glazer
5X Entrepreneur, #1 WSJ & USA Today Bestselling Author, Top .1% Podcast Host and Keynote Speaker. Board Chair & Founder @ Acceleration Partners
A few weeks ago, a friend, and CEO, from Europe called me for advice. Their American subsidiary was allowing employees to work anywhere after the pandemic, and their lawyers and accountants were suddenly confronting consequences after an employee moved to a state where the company had never done business.
Many companies are in a similar situation. As vaccines roll out and cases decline, leaders are considering what the future of work looks like for their organizations. We have seen CEOs from companies like Twitter, Facebook and Shopify pledge that they’re going to allow their employees to work from anywhere, or WFA.
Companies offering a WFA model want to proactively create the flexibility employees want today and remain competitive in the labor market. At the same time, they may be setting themselves up for unexpected, significant costs and challenges.
As someone who has led a fully remote organization since 2007, I’ve seen firsthand the headaches that can come from allowing employees to work from literally anywhere. Ignoring these and riding the WFA wave may have major implications for your business which, is why leaders need to think carefully before committing to the WFA model.
Logistical headaches
Here’s a scenario: you’ve decided to let all employees to remain remote and work from wherever they want after the pandemic. Soon after, a top employee decides to move to London, even though your entire business is based in the United States.
To accommodate this move, you need to figure out how to set this person up as an employee in a new country. You need to ensure all compliance regulations are followed, potentially set up a business entity in the United Kingdom and arrange payroll and benefits in a new market. This will take substantial time and money.
Suddenly, you’re in a bind: do you expend all this effort to let one employee work from another country, or refuse to let them move? If you do the latter, you’ll risk losing a star performer, and undercut your own WFA policy. Plus, what happens if the employee doesn’t even like London and moves to Spain?
Allowing your employees to work from anywhere, without restrictions, has complications and unintended consequences.
Hidden costs
Unfortunately, logistical challenges are only part of the battle when your employees move to new states or countries. These types of migrations can add significant costs as well. For example:
- If an employee changes states, you may find your current healthcare plan does not fit that state’s regulations. You may need pay competitive costs in that state’s insurance market to secure the coverage guaranteed to other employees.
- If your company is in retail, having employees in certain states can trigger Nexus sales taxes--, meaning you might have to start collecting sales tax from that state.
- State income rates and business taxes vary, and you may need to pay to register in each employee’s state and report to that state quarterly. Tax laws are still not clear for remote workers in all states, and companies could be on the hook for additional taxes once these laws are settled.
- If your employees move to new countries, your organization may be required to set up a business entity in each country to ensure compliance. That can easily trigger tens of thousands of dollars in costs.
A company cannot just let employees work wherever they want unless they are ready and willing to absorb these costs. While big companies have HR teams that can handle many of these burdens, smaller businesses will be disproportionately impacted.
Potential legal consequences
As a business leader you might be wondering: is it really necessary to jump through all these hoops today for each employee, or can we deal with that messy red tape later?
The fact is, compliance is an area where you absolutely must do things correctly. Nicole Sahin, CEO of Globalization Partners, an Employer of Record (EOR) that helps businesses legally hire and onboard employees in 180 countries, has seen multiple companies where poor compliance incurred significant fines. In one case, poor compliance nearly tanked a lucrative initial public offering.
Playing fast and loose with tax, compliance and labor laws may seem easier upfront, but the second your company must undergo due-diligence, or is audited by a regulator, the consequences will become clear, and may be painful. Sadly, allowing employees to work from anywhere, without covering your bases creates a lot of new risk for your business.
Scared? You should be, just a little. While it’s tempting to offer a WFA policy, consult in advance with HR experts, lawyers and accountants to ensure your company has the will and resources to make that policy a reality. Once you’ve offered a WFA future to employees, it is going to be hard to close the barn doors behind the horse.
To learn more about this issue, and other topics related to remote work, management and leadership, check out my new book on the topic. How To Thrive In The Virtual Workplace is a comprehensive guide with the principles, tactics and tools you need to excel at any level of a remote workplace. It's available for pre-order in North America now, and for purchase outside North America.
Robert Glazer is the founder and CEO of Acceleration Partners, an award-winning partner marketing agency ranked #4 on Glassdoor’s best places to work.
Commercial Transport Consultancy
3 年interesting view on a complex issue. But I think you are looking at the worst case scenarios here. A US employee moving to Europe... In the US even moving to another state can make a difference. In my experience (I live in Belgium) most employees working from home live in the same country as their employer. The occasional work from a holiday destination is no 'legal' problem as long as you don't overstay a number of days (90 in this case i believe) . I am a contractor myself for a foreign company so the extreme cases or 'grey areas' could be solved that way. I read that some people want to get rid of the idea of 'employees' and go completely for self employed contractors.... I don't think that is the future. That is an entrepreneur's view of things and 80% of the people are not 'entrepreneurs'. Being self-employed comes with a lot of admin, accountants & knowledge of tax laws that a lot of people don't want (or are able) to do and will leave up to the company they work for
Executive Manager: Strategy; Storyteller, Author (FromSmallBeginningstoBigBrands; Don'tBeAfraidtoFail; TheBookstoreThatRejectedMeFor10Years); Founder; CIA
3 年Very insightful article touching on very important issues facing us today. I think it depends on the nature of the business function. For instance my friend's job is systems support and even before the pandemic his work involved providing support to people in other countries yet his based in South Africa. Now, with the pandemic, instead of working from the office in Johannesburg he works from his village home which is about 570km from his Johannesburg home. During the hard lockdown, he did not go to the office at all and when the country opened up, they go to the office one week in a month, so for that week he lives in his Johannesburg home.
3x Founder | GTM Strategy + Fractional CMO for SaaS SMBs | → LinkedIn?? Top Voice and Creator I help B2B brands go from barely noticed to unignorable I Self Made Stories Podcast ??
3 年My solution? Stop hiring employees. This is so outdated. Work with people anywhere and everywhere but work with your CPA to make sure you pay them in the proper way. My team members were set up as independant contrators and paid accordingly. Health insurance isn't an employer's business. What next - mortgage too or kids' schools? Ultimately, pay a person fairly and let them deal with their personal affairs. I see no future in having full-time employees.
Lead Administrator, Human Resources Consultant, HR Generalist, Performance Management Expert, Human Resource Business Partner
3 年This is a beautiful insight to employers, HR experts, legal practitioners, unions and even the government. There is already a disruption to the way we used to work, and I can say that it has come to stay. For an organisation considering the route of WFA, a policy should be put in place that shows - countries/states where employees can work from or not work from - what will be applicable in each employees' peculiar circumstances. This policy will help the employer guard itself against most of the issues raised by Robert Glazer .