A Herd Immunity or A Herd Mentality?

It never gets any easier going against the narrative the herd has been conditioned to adopt because it suits the party line. Yet some are still compelled to speak up despite the objections and threats simply because it is the right thing to do.

The irony is, no one in the herd wants to be seen to support a lie, be wrong or be evil, so its difficult to be open to a plausible alternative which could make you a pariah as your new found knowledge puts you in conflict with the establishment friends and colleagues. Whether you are right or wrong, it requires courage to stand alone or speak up in the midst of an angry crowd and ask is this the best we can be?

Understand it's never the herd telling you what to think, it's always only just a few with influence, barking loudly and repeatedly like the proverbial sheep dog, supported by the mainstream media. They are able to shout anyone down often encouraging a chorus of righteous voices from the herd enabling them to continue their narrative which usually relies on a fear based agenda. This inevitably leads to silence and compliance, in exchange for safety. Our safety however, comes with an entry fee, a fee that Joe Public happily pays by either surrendering liberty, life and or financial security. In the arena of social media, they don't need to shout, they just delete posts that go against the flow and the herd is ready with their virtual baseball bats or bots. If we think about the posts you know that have been removed relating to CV-19, do they incite fear, or do they challenge the narrative that promotes fear by offering solutions i.e. strengthening the immune system and or generic medications with vitamins, thereby potentiality revealing the true agenda of those involved in inciting panic?

To "Divide and Conquer", they politicize the issue, tag anything that discounts the narrative as a "conspiracy theory" and label it as fear mongering, irresponsible or misinformation. The Bakersfield Doctors in California found themselves on the receiving end for questioning the numbers through their own research and despite the statistics being up for debate, it was seen fit to have any reference of them removed from any and all platforms. Its interesting to note that despite the flurry of counter arguments and usual tagging as "Frauds and Trump Supporters" quickly appearing in the media, none of the arguments disputed the Doctor's claim that their was tremendous pressure to report any and all deaths as CV-19 related.

As the truth emerges, unfortunately it will most likely be only in hindsight that many people will come to understand how we were herded into a state of denial. The US constitution is not aspirational and it requires all its citizens to question any attempt to circumvent its hard fought liberties, which sadly many have taken for granted. That contempt for citizens who seek the truth, originates from a sense of arrogance born from media inflicted ignorance. This has become symptomatic of an intentional fear driven agenda programmed to divide us. This could never take hold in a kinder world where civil discourse was not only desired it would be seen as essential, cherished and protected.

We could do worse than to discover we were wrong to shoot the messengers who present the research, fact check and have the evidence, while we remain blissfully unaware of a great deception by those we entrusted with our well being. It's clearly a bridge too far for some to even attempt to leave their comfort zone, preferring to summarily dismiss the evidence without consideration and defend the indefensible. Failing to provide critical thinking and analysis of the evidence we are destined to sleep, never able to consider an alternative from independent sources due to our ego, prejudice and political bias. The puppet masters, must be held to account for the deliberate falsehoods that divided this fragile nation further and see so many suffer around the world but we must also take responsibility for being blinded by our own bias. There are voices willing to put forward the facts without the spin such as Dr David Martin who presents a closing argument looking at the evidence of violations of the US constitution and the illegality of the lockdown related to CV-19 against the CDC and its co-conspirators. A factual and evidence supported concise presentation.

Note: Dr David Martin has been successful in bringing international charges against Starbucks, other corporations and governments relating to intellectual property. This charge has now been sent to the US Attorney General and relative government departments in regards to the patents of the CV-19 virus illegally held by the CDC. (PDF available to download on YouTube.)

The prosecution rests.

https://youtu.be/C2CsNqHFx68 #indivisible