Helping Students Navigate AI: A Balanced Approach for Educators

As educators, we guide students toward becoming critical thinkers and independent learners. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT, Grammarly, and other large language models (LLMs), students now have unprecedented access to automated research assistants. While these tools offer exciting potential for academic research, they also introduce challenges, particularly when students rely on them without understanding the ethical or practical implications.

However, the initial reaction to AI use in academia has been shown to lean toward punitive measures, with concerns that students may bypass traditional learning processes. This is not the first time new technology has caused concern in the classroom. Calculators, laptops, and even search engines faced similar scrutiny when first introduced, yet they are now essential educational tools. The key is to take a balanced approach focusing on education and guidance before punishment, ensuring students understand how to use AI responsibly and effectively. This can often be completed as part of student orientation or located within course syllabi to set the expectations before the start of coursework.

Technology in Education: A Familiar Pattern

As mentioned, the skepticism surrounding AI in education mirrors what we saw with other technological advancements. When calculators were first introduced, a percentage of educators feared they would erode students' arithmetic skills. However, over time, calculators became integrated into learning, allowing students to focus on more complex problem-solving tasks without worrying about basic calculations. The same concerns emerged with the introduction of personal laptops, with fears that students would rely on them too much and neglect foundational learning.

AI, particularly tools like ChatGPT, presents similar concerns. But instead of reacting with punitive measures, educators can approach AI as an opportunity—just as calculators and laptops have been. Rather than banning or heavily penalizing students for AI use, we should focus on how to guide them in its proper application and ensure they understand its limitations. After all, AI-powered tools are not going anywhere and will become a major part of future workflows. Not teaching how to responsibly and effectively use them could almost be considered negligent to students in both the current and future workforce.

Teaching AI’s Strengths and Weaknesses

Because these are powerful tools in any professional kit, and because of the time they can save those who employ them, students will naturally use it whether they teach themselves or are guided by others. One of the main reasons students may misuse AI tools is that they haven't been properly taught about AI’s limitations. Many students, influenced by media hype, might assume that AI outputs are always accurate or reliable. However, AI models often produce "hallucinations"—plausible but factually incorrect information. Students who are unaware of this may unknowingly include incorrect or incomplete data in their research. To a professor, this may seem “lazy” or be seen as a malicious attempt to cut corners in either research or writing. Though this may have been true only a few years ago, peer-reviewed research and published books often held factual information. This means that errors such as this would largely be attributed to the aforementioned issues and not to the material itself. However, take the same student who excelled at research and how to verify the accuracy of the information and place them in a situation using a language model without the knowledge that the output could be incorrect and you could find yourself in this current situation.

Educators must emphasize the importance of verification. Teach students to cross-check AI-generated content against credible, peer-reviewed sources, and guide them on how to use AI as a tool for exploration rather than a shortcut to answers. Briefly addressing the potential for AI to hallucinate or generate misleading information can help students approach their use of AI with a more critical mindset while reducing miscommunication and misinterpretation of a student’s intentions in their work.

Stress and the Appeal of AI

It’s also essential to understand the pressures students face. Many undergraduate students are balancing schoolwork, part-time jobs, internships, and personal commitments. AI tools that promise efficiency and fast answers may seem like a lifeline for students managing heavy workloads. If we immediately penalize students for turning to these tools without fully understanding their challenges and limitations, we risk alienating them and missing an opportunity to teach them how to use AI responsibly. We can also risk gravely damaging the relationship between us and them, and them and our institution.

Instead, educators should acknowledge these external stressors and engage students in conversations about when and how AI can be helpful in managing time and workload, while still maintaining the integrity of academic work. By approaching the issue with empathy, educators can support students in learning how to balance their use of AI with their responsibilities, rather than viewing it as an act of academic dishonesty.

Encouraging Critical Thinking: AI and Cognitive Load

AI tools can be valuable in reducing cognitive load by handling simpler tasks, allowing students to focus on deeper analysis. However, educators should also teach students how to structure prompts that require more engagement from themselves. For example, a student could be encouraged to ask AI to explain basic concepts but request further quizzes or interactive tasks that challenge their understanding:

"I need to ask questions about organic chemistry. Please explain the fundamentals, quiz me, and leave the cognitive load on me."

This type of prompt helps students actively engage with the material while using AI as a supplementary tool. Instructors can model these kinds of prompts, helping students understand how to work through all levels of a model such as Bloom’s Taxonomy—from basic understanding to critical evaluation and creation—by framing their AI use around deep learning goals. Methods such as these not only help create a strong foundation in designing effective prompts but, can increase the possibility of students becoming life-long learners using these tools in continuous education.

Additionally, educators could require students to submit an AI transcript alongside their final work. This would not only provide transparency but also allow instructors to see how students interacted with AI and whether they are applying cognitive rigor to their inquiries. Akin to students showing how they reached certain mathematical solutions, it assists educators in understanding a student’s thought process while identifying additional growth opportunities.

Teaching Students to Verify AI Outputs

Students need to develop the habit of verifying AI-generated information, just as they would with any other source. Educators can guide students through simple but effective strategies:

• Cross-referencing facts: Encourage students to verify claims made by AI tools by checking them against peer-reviewed sources, academic journals, or credible websites. Even using tools such as Microsoft Copilot, to provide sources they can check, strengthens the connection between effective research practices and the requirement that they actively verify their claims.
• Checking for bias: Students should be taught that AI tools can reflect the biases of the data they were trained on. Encourage them to critically analyze AI outputs for any unbalanced or skewed perspectives. Students should never trust that an output from a language model is correct and submit it without proper verification.
• Using fact-checking resources: Direct students to use fact-checking websites or tools, especially for topics that require accuracy or are highly controversial.

By incorporating these strategies into the curriculum, educators can teach students the importance of not accepting AI outputs at face value, reinforcing critical thinking and responsible research practices.

Integrating AI into Traditional Learning Models

Rather than viewing AI tools as replacements for traditional learning methods, educators can explore ways to integrate AI into the classroom. This could include:

• AI-driven quizzes: Create quizzes that challenge students on topics they have studied, using AI to generate questions or scenarios that help them apply their knowledge. As subject matter experts, educators can be creative with their prompts in designing quizzes as they understand the material and can make corrections if needed. This practice can require students to evaluate their responses in creative and non-traditional ways that standardized testing often lacks.
• Feedback from AI: Encourage students to use AI for initial feedback on grammar or structure in their writing, but emphasize the importance of human revision and deeper analytical thinking.
• Prompting complex questions: Show students how to use AI to explore complex questions and engage in exploratory research, guiding them on how to refine their queries for deeper, more meaningful insights.

These strategies help students see AI as a tool to enhance their learning, not replace the traditional methods of research, analysis, and writing.

Conclusion: A Learning Environment Focused on Growth

It is crucial to foster an environment where AI is seen as a tool for growth and learning, not as a threat to academic integrity. We must resist the temptation to view students’ use of AI as inherently malicious. Instead, our approach should be rooted in understanding, guidance, and empathy. If our educational institutions offer a culture of skepticism and assumed wrong, it is our responsibility to address and overcome it. Otherwise, we are setting students up for failure, both in the classroom and the workplace. With faith in institutions of higher learning on increasingly shaky ground in the public eye these days, we need to do what we can to create value and a culture of open learning for our students.

By teaching students how to use AI responsibly, how to verify its outputs, and how to integrate it into their learning, we are preparing them for a future where AI will continue to play a significant role in both academic and professional contexts. Let’s prioritize education over punishment and ensure that students understand both the opportunities and the limitations of AI tools.

Some of our AI Trainings:

AI for Professional 8-Week Certificate Training: https://www.martinbrossmanandassociates.com/ai-training-for-professionals/

Unlock the Power of Artificial Intelligence to Supercharge Your Small Business Operations and Marketing Success https://www.ncsmallbusinesstraining.com/unlock-the-power-of-artificial-intelligence-to-supercharge-your-small-business-operations-and-marketing-success/

Our Small Business AI certificate program https://www.ncsmallbusinesstraining.com/ai-powered-business-solutions-certificate-for-small-business-owners/

Professional AI training https://martinbrossmanspeaks.com/artificial-intelligence-ai-machine-learning-ml-and-the-4th-industrial-revolution-are-you-ready/