Help is on the way to lift IoT out of its “trough of disillusionment” . . .

Help is on the way to lift IoT out of its “trough of disillusionment” . . .

In the past week, I saw two articles on LinkedIn where “IoT” and the phrase, “trough of disillusionment”, appeared together.

As a long-term participant in the IoT ecosystem focused on Digital Twins, I have dealt with the reasons for this disillusionment for some 20 years now! After deploying plant-wide IoT system and display digital twin, my client’s excitement faded quickly after the initial warm feeling seeing real-time data from all the equipment in one place . . . Beyond “visibility”, where is the beef? We didn’t have really good answers . . .

Even now, digital twins are based on thresholding or banding sensor amplitudes (or some point-measurements on their FFTs) which are replete with False Positives. Technician runs on to the plant floor based on an alarm and finds that it is a false positive – this happens a few more times and people start ignoring the alarms; soon after they are ready to chuck the software out of the window! I don’t blame them.

The other bugaboo is the business model of large IoT companies that present Digital Twin (and IoT) as a “No-code” or “Low-code” self-installed system. This appeal to “democratization” is understandable from their business model – they want a huge installed base without an army of field application engineers (FAEs).

IoT works in highly verticalized and compartmentalized business domains. FAEs for Machinery vertical have very different track record from Building monitoring FAEs, for example. The REAL business model story is this –

IoT provides real-time visibility into production operations – a “democratized” solution with a handful of Solution Engineers CAN deliver revenue to the IoT platform company.

Digital Twins on the other hand need crafting on a usecase – per – usecase basis! Other than a basic digital twin (that provides low value to the client), the real value generating digital twin is a CONSULTING business!

In short, digital twin has not progressed due poor choice of business model and lack of performance information extraction ability. I am glad to report that Eminds.ai has solved both these issues. We hope that this will open the flood-gates of Digital Twin applications that provides real business value to the customers, thus pulling IoT out of the doldrums.

Eminds.ai takes a “product-enabled” service consulting model. Admittedly, this is not a massively scalable model. Our vision is to scale by partnering with many more firms like us and use our base product for their consulting services in verticals where they are super-specialized.

?

How does TwinARC work?

Your current IoT platform only enables observation of raw data on a?dashboard that leaves a lot of questions unanswered.?A call to our secure API summons the power of TwinARC into your existing IoT platform.


Our solution combines Rules Digital Twin that DETECTS ISSUES, Stats Digital Twin that ASSIGNS PROBABILITIES and using a META LEARNER, makes the traditional “brittle” digital twin outputs a thing of the past. Once the Data clears certain technical hurdles, our CAUSAL Digital Twin allows you to perform “Root-cause” and “What-if” analysis that leads to deeper performance understanding and unprecedented improvement!

Eminds.ai invites IoT Platform providers and IoT Consultants to jointly sell a high-value, end-to-end solution integrated with TwinARC to meet your customers’ need for performance understanding and improvement!

For more information, visit: https://www.eminds.ai/DT.html?

Write to [email protected] for engaging with us for a NO-COST test deployment of TwinARC in your physical product manufacturing enterprise!

?#digitaltwin #iot #causal #manufacturing #twinarc

Sachin Shan

DevOps Engineer

1 年

Best approach!

回复
Ganesh Saravanan

UX Designer & Mentor at Enterprise Minds, Inc

1 年

Good One ?

回复
Rob Tiffany??

Research Director @ IDC

1 年

Good assessment

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Dr. PG Madhavan的更多文章

  • All I wanted to know about GenAI in 2025 . . .

    All I wanted to know about GenAI in 2025 . . .

    . .

    4 条评论
  • Adding to the Epistemology of Causality

    Adding to the Epistemology of Causality

    You observe a practical situation. You try to figure out the laws related to the observed phenomenon.

  • Causality for Engineers

    Causality for Engineers

    Here is a “pragmatic” explanation of Causality – I aim to explain “concepts” accurately at the expense of (sometimes…

    3 条评论
  • TwinARC for AOM

    TwinARC for AOM

    TwinARC is a “modern” digital twin that goes beyond observability of your manufacturing facilities. Asset Operations…

  • Time to embrace MODERN digital twins!

    Time to embrace MODERN digital twins!

    When we deployed the first industrial scale real-time “IoT" and “Digital Twin” systems in USA in 2000, our digital twin…

    3 条评论
  • A short and personal history of Causality in Industry

    A short and personal history of Causality in Industry

    This history is indeed short since applications in Industry are just starting out! Causality methods applicable in…

    1 条评论
  • Evolution of Digital Twins: From Data to Knowledge

    Evolution of Digital Twins: From Data to Knowledge

    Written by ChatGPT based on a long series of LinkedIn comments (18 Sep 2023) in response to a post by Dr. PG Madhavan…

  • TwinARC - complete digital twin solution for enterprises making physical products

    TwinARC - complete digital twin solution for enterprises making physical products

    IoT platform providers have laid the groundwork for you to measure and observe your operations. Now Eminds TwinARC adds…

    1 条评论
  • Causality in IoT – a short history

    Causality in IoT – a short history

    Interest in cause and effect relationships has pre-historic roots. Did the stone I threw kill the beast .

    1 条评论
  • Prescriptive Analytics & Causal digital twin

    Prescriptive Analytics & Causal digital twin

    A question was raised recently as to what "Prescriptive Analytics" really is and its relationship to Causality . .

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了