HELP! CITIZEN CONTROLLED TAX ALLOCATION AND DISTRIBUTION
Ok, so I’ve had an Idea to make a governments spending of tax money fairer and more representative of their citizens and I need help. I've got over 11,000 connections so I know if we put out heads together we could do something really cool.
The idea is an app (smart phone/PC/web based/whatever) where there is essentially tax allocation sliders that allow you, the citizen, to decide how your tax contribution gets allocated.
So for example if you are completely against war – you can choose not to fund it. Or if you are against Planned Parenthood you could choose not to fund it. The people that do support those things will allocate their distribution to fund it.
Real Example: Some people in the US are very much for ‘the wall’ and other are very much against it – if it does go ahead at least you can be safe in the knowledge that none of your tax dollars would go to building it, and maybe if people were more accountable for where their money was being spent they would maybe decide that there are better things to spend money on – who knows?
There might need to be some nuances and maybe some more in-depth questions. For example, I imagine there are many people who support the troops but don’t support the wars that the troops are sent to fight. They might want to make sure that their money goes towards making sure the soldiers and vets are looked after but not towards drone strikes.
This isn’t a discussion about whether peoples beliefs about wars or walls are right or wrong, this is just a discussion about allowing people to actually choose what their tax dollars get spent on.
The neat thing too is that when a disaster happens like a storm that wrecks communities and leaves people without food and shelter the government could do a 'contribution drive' where a little box pops up saying “Are you happy to increase your tax contribution by 1%/$1/whatever this month the help the victims of hurricane X?” or something to that effect. It would make donating 'one-click simple'.
Maybe there could be a corporate version too.
People would then be able to see exactly how much has been raised and it would hold politicians accountable as citizens who have contributed would want to see how and where the money gets spent. People could also link their social media to show that they have helped the good cause…because people like doing that.
I imagine there would need to be a certain percentage of the money that people don’t get to decide with to cover essential things that we would never consider to be important. I am unsure of what percentage this would need to be. But even if you got to decide how to allocate your remaining 50% (for arguments sake) that is still cool, right?
You’d have to verify yourself in the app somehow, national insurance number and some other details I guess, but that shouldn’t be too hard.
This isn’t a complete idea obviously – I wanted as much input from as many people as possible to really see if this is possible.
Questions I need help answering:
- Is this actually a good/moral idea?
- Is there anything I'm totally not seeing as to why this wouldn't work?
- Are there any added benefits that I haven't thought of?
- What percentage of peoples tax should they get to decide with?
- How likely/possible is fraud?
- How often should people be able to alter their allocation?
- Can people actually be trusted to decide what their money gets spent on or is that the job of the government?
- Does the tech exist to make this work?
- What tech would that be?
- Can blockchain help at all?
- Would this be too cost prohibitive to create, run, manage and maintain?
- Does anyone know of a company who could make a cool prototype?
- What’s the best way to get a government to trial it?
- Would any of you be interested in starting a little ‘think tank’ to discuss this and other ideas?
Please share this with your connections or tag people you think might be interested or able to help because I don’t know how to make this work and maybe they do.
Coming soon.
6 年I think that as long as the government doesn't control it, the costs wouldn't spiral and it would be less likely to be inefficient. I'd love for your company to take a crack at it - I'll message you. I think that sounds like a good place to start. Sweet, consider yourself counted lol.
In service to those on the forefront of the evolutionary shift towards a world that works for all life.
6 年Part VII (of VII): | Would this be too cost prohibitive to create, run, manage and maintain? It shouldn't be too expensive to create a proof of concept pilot from which firmer cost estimates could be derived. | Does anyone know of a company who could make a cool prototype? I'd love for my company to take a crack at it! | What's the best way to get a government to trial it? I'd try it at the state government level - they collect income taxes and are more open to innovation than the federal government. | Would any of you be interested in starting a little 'think tank' to discuss this and other ideas? Count me in.
In service to those on the forefront of the evolutionary shift towards a world that works for all life.
6 年Part VI: | Does the tech exist to make this work? Yes. | What tech would that be? * Mobile apps, * De-centralized identity -- https://identity.foundation * Distributed ledger technology - e.g., blockchain or its more scalable off-shoots like Tangle (https://iota.org) or Holochain(https://holochain.org) - to enable non-forgeable, immutable votes to be captured from authenticated individuals and tied to transparent, verifiable allocation of funds without the need for 3rd party intermediaries (and their attendant bureaucracies and vulnerabilities). Data Analytics - to enable data-driven monitoring and evolution of the concept and aid in fraud prevention and detection. | Can blockchain help at all? Yep. See above.
In service to those on the forefront of the evolutionary shift towards a world that works for all life.
6 年Part V: | Can people actually be trusted to decide what their money gets spent on or is that the job of the government? My first impulse was to dismiss this question as horribly patronizing. Don't people make decisions about what their money is spent on in every other area of their life??? Isn't the foundation of democracy: government of, by and for the people??? But the deeper question I think you are asking is… can people be trusted to make informed decisions about tax allocation when it is such a struggle to get people to exercise their right to vote every 2-4 years? This is a legitimate question, worthy of some attention. But I would argue that the opportunity to directly control how my tax dollars get spent is a far more immediate and tangible outcome than casting one of thousands (or millions) of votes for one of two pre-selected candidates. Hence, it offers a more compelling motivation for engagement.
In service to those on the forefront of the evolutionary shift towards a world that works for all life.
6 年Part IV: | How likely/possible is fraud? If real dollars are truly at stake, then fraud will certainly follow. On the other hand, as long as people are just voting on categories (and not specific initiatives or companies), you remove some of the incentive for fraud. Key issues: How do you prevent people from voting multiple times (the "vote early/vote often" syndrome)? Conversely, how do you encourage broad participation in the process, to prevent highly mobilized special interest groups from exerting undue influence? How do you deal with vulnerabilities anywhere along the path between votes and distribution of funds. | How often should people be able to alter their allocation? Predictable revenue streams are essential for long-term projects. Also… people have their own lives to live. To ensure broad engagement, you probably don't want to ask them too often. On the other hand, more frequent voting offers greater responsiveness -- e.g., to natural (or human-caused) disasters.