Healthspan Versus Lifespan Inside Of Organization's
Jacob Morgan
Keynote Speaker, Professionally Trained Futurist, & 5x Author. Founder of "Future Of Work Leaders" (Global CHRO Community). Focused on Leadership, The Future of Work, & Employee Experience
Want to become a better leader by getting access to articles like this one? This post first appeared for premium subscribers of Great Leadership on Substack and was published on May 26, 2023. If you want to get access to exclusive articles and weekly 5 min leadership tips (videos), then make sure to become a premium subscriber and get all of my best content and latest thinking delivered to your inbox. Learn more and sign up here.
Lately I’ve been a bit obsessed with the concept of longevity which looks at healthspan and lifespan. Lifespan is how long you live and healthspan is the quality of your life in the years you have. While you can’t necessarily control how long you live, you can certainly do everything in your power to make sure your quality of life is high.
I just finished reading Peter Attia’s book called “Longevity” and am also reading David Sinclair’s book called “Lifespan.” Both are fascinating reads and if you are into the science, mechanics, and chemistry of your body, food, and exercise then I recommend both of them.
Most of us focus on our lifespan which makes sense, after all, who wouldn’t want to live a long life? But what if the quality of your life severely diminishes as you get to your 70’s, 80’s, and hopefully your 90’s? Is a long life really the best goal you should be aiming for?
This is just as applicable inside of our organizations as it is our lives.
A few years ago, my grandfather Alex passed away in his 80’s in Melbourne, Australia. I wasn’t able to be there with him and had to watch him go on FaceTime, it was one of the hardest things I ever had to do and when it happened I turned to my wife and cried.
The last few years of his life he was on dialysis and had to spend hours each week sitting on a chair while his blood ran through a machine that cleaned and filtered it for him. He couldn’t go for walks, eat or drink what he wanted, and he would sleep for most of the day. I won’t go into more details but although he was alive he was miserable.
I’m now putting all of time and energy to focus on my healthspan which ideally will lead to an increased lifespan. In other words it’s not just about the years I have but the quality of life I have in those years.
The point of all of this is that I believe we need to think in terms of healthspan and lifespan inside of our organizations (impact and tenure) which I expand on below.
When most of us start working for an organization we are genuinely excited to be there and we want to make an impact. Through outdated office politics, bureaucracy, and hierarchy, our engagement and impact declines, in other words, our quality of life goes down but the organization as a whole is still focused on optimizing how long we stay there.
Clearly this doesn’t make any sense.
To borrow a concept from Peter Attia’s book…
领英推荐
Tenure
For decades tenure has been a metric we have focused on, we want to employees to stay at our organizations as long as possible and tenure has always been used as a barometer for loyalty and the value that an employee can contribute. Perhaps this made sense decades ago up through the 80’s and 90’s but technology changed all of that as we are all able to quickly scour the web for new opportunities and get recruited on platforms like LinkedIn.
As we saw with the quiet quitting trend, just because someone is at your company doesn’t mean they are adding value, so do you still want them there?
What if the employees are miserable, they aren’t contributing, or worse, they are creating an environment that hinders others? Would you rather have employees who stay at your company for ten years and are just “ok” or would you rather have employees who only stay at your company for 2 years but make a significant impact? (Of course the ideal scenario is you get employees who stay for 10 years AND make an significant impact.) Don’t focus on the length of time someone is with you, focus on the impact they have while they are with you.
This doesn’t meant that tenure shouldn’t a metric that you pay attention to, but it shouldn’t be the only one.
Leadership
If you’re a leader at an organization and you are responsible for others then it’s also crucial for you to think in terms of your healthspan and lifespan at the organization. Meaning are you just at the company for a long time or are you are able to consistently unlock the potential of others, drive change, and make a positive impact. Are you able to increase the healthspan and lifespan of those around you? Being a leader is one of the hardest yet rewarding positions you can take on yet so many leaders seem to be “coasting” when they get to that level.
These are two important aspects that we should be paying attention to not just in our lives but also inside of our organizations. Lifespan is far easier to quantify and focus on it’s simply “how long has Joe worked here?”
The impact of healthspan requires more effort and time to look at. Healthspan metrics can include things like impact to the bottom line, customer feedback, engagement surveys, reviews from peers, ideas that are put forward and innovations implemented, professional development goals (taking courses, certifications, etc), and ability to deliver on goals. All of these things (and many others) go beyond how long an employee is with you.
Are you measuring your and your employees’ healthspan and lifespan? If not, I highly recommend you start.
Get access to more content like this by becoming a premium subscriber on Substack where each week you will get these types of articles delivered to your inbox along with other content.
GTM | Market Intelligence | Business Controller | Financial Analysis | Strategic Decision Support | Business Analysis | Data-Driven Growth Strategist | Competitive Insights | AI-Driven Decision-Making
8 个月"Absolutely agree! Focusing only on tenure can be a trap, keeping disengaged employees while high-potential talent moves on. By measuring 'healthspan' through metrics like goal impact, customer feedback, and innovation, we can better identify and retain our most valuable contributors. This approach nurtures a dynamic and effective workforce, fostering growth and success." 1. Set Clear Metrics: Track goal impact, customer feedback, and innovation to assess employee contributions. Organization can help by 2. Regular Feedback: Implement 360-degree reviews and one-on-one meetings for continuous performance insights. 3. Professional Development: Offer learning opportunities and recognize exceptional performance to encourage growth. 4. Utilize Analytics: Use performance dashboards and engagement surveys to monitor and analyze employee data. 5. Promote Well-Being: Support work-life balance, inclusive culture, and healthy work environments to maintain high morale and productivity. #healthspan #lifespan #workplaceculture
Chief People Officer | Talent & Culture Architect | Corporate Yogi | Helping People & Businesses Grow Sustainably & Profitably
9 个月Jacob Morgan Love this analogy. I'm also reading David Sinclair's book called "Life Span." And, I agree, the concepts apply to all areas of our lives. Most people spend a huge portion of their lives at work. And, their work has a profound effect on their health and the levers that affect both lifespan and healthspan. I couldn't agree more that we should be regularly assessing healthspan of all employees and developing proactive and individualized action plans to keep their healthspan and level of engagement as contribution as high as possible for as long as possible.
Sales & Distribution | Franchise Management | Channel Management | Mobile Financial Services | Retail Sales | Alternate Channel Sales | B2B B2C Sales | Project Sales | High Value Customer Sales | Services | E-Business
9 个月New experience / New resource can create upward, downward or no change impacts, So 33.3% chance of growth but 66.6% chance of Business downfall / Zero growth. Experience mostly leads to excellence and effectiveness if organization really cares his real asset (Employe). Change is a a natural phenomena, If organization management requires bigger and better changes continuously in business growth, expansions, volumes, revenues , targets, services and profits from employe. The employe expects the same betterment in salary, privileges, promotion, career development and skill upgradation opportunities from organization. If organization and employe strengthen each other in a balanced way then performance and business both will grow continuously. Age limit / Job duration does not matter.
Business Employee Retention Strategies | Key Retention Focus: Employee Experience and Manager-Employee Relationship | Proven, Effective 3 Step System | Attractive Benefits/ROI's
9 个月Thanks Jacob Morgan. A few thoughts 1- I think there has to be a healthy balance. Not all employees will stay for their careers (in fact few will) but at the same time it becomes very difficult to hire new employees, train and invest in them and within 6-8 months they're gone!! The workplace and workforce needs are definitely changing and this is certainly impacting who they will stay with and why- most likely the employers who support them on a personal level and where they find rewarding and enjoyable work. I dont feel it is healthy for employers to not focus on employee retention- the ramifications to costs, operations, brand, knowledge and innovation ......are are simply too great. While you may not hold on to every employee you may certainly want to hold on to top performers that drive your business, quality, reliable employees succession candidates, etc. Yes every organization wants to maximize the output and productivity of employees whether short or long tenure and leadership plays a critical role. Perhaps the answer is focusing on leadership practices/principles that drive high performance, loyalty & retention to maximize employee lifetime value. Believe me, retention does make sense today even with shifting dynamics.
By investing in training, mentorship, and career advancement programs, organizations can help employees feel valued and motivated to contribute their best. Fostering a culture of recognition and appreciation can go a long way in making employees feel seen and acknowledged for their efforts.