HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS ARE FAILING CLINICIANS: THE COST OF INEFFICIENT TECHNOLOGY

Since the introduction of Electronic Health Records (EHRs), the U.S. healthcare system has seen minimal, if any, productivity gains. In stark contrast, nearly every other industry has improved output per worker thanks to technology. While sectors like manufacturing, retail, and finance have leveraged tech to drive efficiency, healthcare remains stagnant. The burden of this inefficiency falls on clinicians, who now spend more time navigating cumbersome systems than delivering patient care.

?

The Productivity Paradox in Healthcare

Imagine a restaurant introducing new software for seating, ordering, and billing. Instead of speeding up operations, the software cuts efficiency by 50%. Chefs spend as much time entering data as cooking, and waiters check meaningless boxes instead of taking orders. If this scenario unfolded, that software would be immediately discarded. Yet in healthcare, clinicians are forced to work with inefficient EHR systems that create this very problem—and somehow, the systems remain in place.

?

From 1990 to 2020, most industries saw significant productivity increases due to technological advances. In healthcare, however, clinicians now spend two hours on paperwork and EHR tasks for every hour spent with patients, according to the American Medical Association (AMA). The promised benefits of EHRs—streamlined documentation, improved care coordination, and fewer errors—have largely gone unrealized. Instead, physicians and nurses are drowning in administrative tasks that take time away from patients.

?

Healthcare’s "Innovations" Have Slashed Productivity

Unlike other industries where technology is used to optimize performance, EHRs in healthcare were primarily designed to maximize billing efficiency, not patient care. These systems capture every CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) code, track comorbidities, and inflate "observed-to-expected" metrics—all at the expense of clinician time.

For example:

? Survey data shows that 40% of physicians report that EHRs are a major source of stress and burnout.

? A study published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine found that doctors spend 49% of their time on EHR tasks and only 27% on direct patient care. This inefficient allocation of time doesn’t just frustrate doctors—it reduces the number of patients they can see and the quality of care they can deliver.

Would any other industry tolerate a technology that cuts productivity in half?

?

The Root Cause: Billing vs. Care

These inefficient EHR systems were imposed on physicians by large corporate conglomerates with a focus on maximizing revenue, not improving care. These systems are designed to ensure that no billing opportunity is missed, tracking every element of care that can generate revenue—regardless of whether it contributes to better outcomes for patients. Clinicians, in turn, are forced to comply with an endless series of checkboxes and forms that benefit administrators and insurers more than patients.

Consider Observed-to-Expected (O/E) metrics, originally intended to measure care quality. These metrics can be gamed by hospitals to appear more efficient on paper, often by demanding more administrative work from clinicians. As a result, the time spent optimizing these metrics is time taken away from patient care.

?

The Impact on Patient Outcomes

What makes this inefficiency even more troubling is that it hasn’t led to better patient outcomes. According to RAND Corporation, healthcare productivity remains stagnant, and the push for technology hasn’t resulted in improved patient satisfaction or health outcomes. Despite spending over $3.8 trillion annually on healthcare in the U.S., key health indicators like life expectancy and chronic disease management lag behind other developed nations.

?

Countries like the Netherlands and Switzerland, which have embraced more clinician-friendly systems, see better patient outcomes with less administrative burden. Meanwhile, U.S. physicians face increasing burnout, and patients receive less personalized care, despite the higher costs.

The Path Forward: Building Advanced Systems That Actually Work

To fix this broken system, we need better, more advanced technology that genuinely increases efficiency and improves patient care. Rather than simply maximizing billing, new systems should be designed to:

1. Increase Efficiency: Clinician-centered EHR systems must be developed with input from those who use them daily. These systems should automate time-consuming tasks like data entry, allowing doctors and nurses to focus on patient care rather than paperwork.

2. Provide Actionable Data: Next-generation healthcare technology should deliver real-time, actionable data that helps clinicians make better decisions. Rather than overwhelming doctors with irrelevant information, these systems should provide clear insights that lead to better outcomes.

3. Give Clinicians Time Back: By streamlining documentation and automating administrative tasks, new systems should give clinicians more time to spend with patients. Restoring this balance can improve both clinician well-being and the patient experience.

4. Focus on Outcomes, Not Billing: Shift from systems designed to maximize billing to those that prioritize patient outcomes. This means focusing on improving health metrics and satisfaction rather than meeting arbitrary billing requirements.

5. Smarter, Seamless Integration: New systems need to integrate seamlessly with clinical workflows, reducing the cognitive load on physicians. Intuitive, well-designed platforms can empower clinicians to focus on what they do best—caring for patients.

The future of healthcare technology lies in systems that empower clinicians, not burden them. Only by prioritizing efficiency and care over billing can we truly modernize the healthcare system.

?

It’s clear that healthcare needs to take a page from other industries and adopt technology that increases productivity rather than stifles it. Clinicians deserve tools that help them work smarter, not harder. By building better systems that prioritize efficiency and provide the data needed to improve outcomes, we can give doctors and nurses their time back and ensure that patient care remains the priority. The current system is failing clinicians and, ultimately, patients. It’s time for a change—one that finally puts care, not billing, at the center of healthcare innovation.

?