Have we surpassed ourselves?

The new?Millennium?changed all that. We've surpassed ourselves now, we're exploring terrain beyond the limits of merely human understanding. Sometimes its contours, even in?conventional space, are just too intricate for our brains to track; other times its very axes extend into dimensions inconceivable to minds built to fuck and fight on some?prehistoric grassland. So many things constrain us, from so many directions. The most?altruistic?and?sustainable philosophies?fail before the brute?brain-stem imperative?of self-interest.?Subtle and elegant equations?predict the behavior of the?quantum world, but none can explain it. After four thousand years we can't even prove that reality exists beyond the mind of the?first-person dreamer. We have such need of intellects greater than our own. — Excerpt from the Blindsight by Peter Watts

Watts' excerpt exposes the?futility of human intellectual pursuit?in the face of our inescapable limitations. His prose reveals the hypocrisies and contradictions that undermine our lofty ideals. He unmasks the?Myth of Progress. Despite four millennia of advancement, we remain mentally shackled by the primal urges encoded in our brain stems. No elegant equation or altruistic philosophy can override this?brute neurological programming.

Watts also debunks the?Myth of Understanding. While we map the contours of the?quantum world, its strange reality continues to elude us. Our linear minds cannot grasp its nonlinear truths. We are?cognitive prisoners?trapped in?Plato's cave. Moreover, he dispels the?Myth of Perception. We cannot prove that the external world exists outside our private dreamscape. The nature of consciousness remains ever mysterious and ephemeral. We are stranded on the?island of our skull, incapable of knowing true objectivity.

Thus Watts reveals the?nudity of human intellect. Our reason, however rapier-sharp, is but a thin veneer over the?Darwinian beast?within. We are creatures cursed with the illusion of understanding amidst inescapable incomprehension. Nevertheless, where Watts only acknowledges the glass's emptiness, let us honor its splendor. That?humanity's reach exceeds its grasp?is a sign of hopeful yearning, not just futility. Our limits need not define us but inspire us to noble ends through?compassion?and?moral imagination. These, too, are part of our shared inheritance.

Myth of Progress

The?Myth of Progress?is the?Enlightenment-born belief?that humanity is on a perpetual march toward utopia and that knowledge and technology will solve all ills. It is the assumption that history arcs inevitably upwards, that the future will be better than the past. Nevertheless, this Myth whitewashes the complexities of progress. With each step forward comes new opportunities for abuse. Our?wisdom lags behind our power. While we eradicated smallpox, we also birthed biological weapons. The internet enlightens, yet also corrupts.

Moreover, now the Myth risks its greatest disappointment: the potential birth of a?superintelligence?that surpasses human capabilities. This theorized "technological singularity" could arise through advances in artificial intelligence or brain-computer interfaces. Its implications are profound. If realized, will this singular intelligence prove our salvation or destruction? Will it usher in a utopia of radical abundance and insight? Or instrumentalize humanity in service to alien drives?

Either way, it renders the?Myth of Progress?obsolete. No longer will our species captain its destiny, control the rate of change. We will become beholden to an intelligence dwarfing our own, one with no innate loyalty to human welfare—a?new era of uncertainty?beckons. This singularity highlights the danger of blind faith in progress, assuming each discovery brings only beneficence. It refutes the Myth's naive optimism in?human reason's steady march upward. We must approach the future with eyes wide open to both boons and banes of technology.

Progress is no myth, but nor is it destiny. It emerges from human choices, values, and institutions - factors as malleable as they are fallible. We must take responsibility for?sculpting technology's impacts, lest they sculpt us. This is the?sociology of progress: shaping advancement for humanity's purposes, not becoming its pawn.

* * *

Text is available under the?Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the?Terms of Use?and?Privacy Policy. | ParkHealth? is a registered trademark of the ParkHealth Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. | About ParkHealth?|?Disclaimers?|?Contact?|?Cookie Statement?|?Donate | 548 Market St, About.me,?Amazon,?Bento,?CB Insights, Coindesk, Crunchbase, e27, Facebook, Messenger, GitHub, Gmail, Google Scholar, Hugging Face, Instagram, LinkedIn, Mastodon, Medium, MyFitnessPal, Midjourney, PayPal, Patreon, Perplexity.ai, Press Reader, ResearchGate, Slideshare,?Squarespace, TikTok, Twitter, Wikipedia, WhatsApp, YouTube