Has the United Nations organization been fooled? Or they are fooling the international community?
See the article below. The Cyrus Cylinder is a falsification of the Cylinder of Abrahamic Council of Universal Matriarchy Mission

Has the United Nations organization been fooled? Or they are fooling the international community?

Pseudo Cyrus Cylinder, Inscriptions of Nabonidus and the declaration of human rights

Ideology and lawgiving institutions existed probably in ca. 40 millennium BC in ancient Near East (Kurdish)

This document is proof that the contemporary establishment for etymology and historical linguistics is a falsehood.

No alt text provided for this image

On artifacts of ca. 8 millennium BC occur widespread the cross-cardinal sign (dinker, dinger) "cardinal, lawgiver", and the cross-mass sign (ma?) "act", which are matriarchal fertility symbols of cellular development and growth as well as symbols of natural social lawgiving continue in cuneiform inscriptions. Accordingly, culture does not arise at once, that culture goes back to about 40 millennium BC.?

In the Law Codes of Ur-Nammu and Hammu-Rabi, well-known cuneiform inscriptions of about the third millennium BC occur texts: jí-asu-dán-di (Esses institute of the idea), or din-jí-dán-ki (vision academy "knowledge-place of vision").

?Universities continue the falsehoods of Romans

Below, the ancient matriarchy motto ba?ar-yak-bí (one-human-being) is transformed to the one God by the Romans and to hocus-pocus by the universities.

This motto appears as a common thread throughout almost all ancient cuneiform texts of all periods.

asás-dá-yak ba?ar-yak ?á-bí-ia (one-mother-essence one-human-being-authority).

dá ba?ar-yak-bí ?u (matriarchy one-human-being authority).

gap-u ume ba?ar-yak-ga-ti (principles of universal human-unity).

ádi-?a ám-pá ume-ma?-gur (ministry of human-based general principle act).

i-na ensu ?át-?a ru (this is humans' happiness spirit).

This document is proof that the contemporary establishments of archaeology, anthropology, ethnography, history, linguistics, the Bible, and monotheism are based on hoaxes that have been imposed to deceive the world. ?

The Cyrus Cylinder is a false presentation of the proper Cylinder of Abrahamic Council of Universal Matriarchy Mission that has been displayed at United Nations headquarters as the Cyrus Cylinder "Edict of Cyrus” (ca. 576 – 530 BC) the great Aryan king of Persia "modern Iran", king of the world, ... king of the four quarters' declaration concerning the preservation of human rights. The Cyrus Cylinder has now been recognized as the world’s first charter of human rights.?

The Cyrus Cylinder is a false presentation?of the proper Cylinder of Abrahamic Council of Universal Matriarchy Mission that has been displayed at United Nations headquarters as the Cyrus Cylinder "Edict of Cyrus” (ca. 576 – 530 BC) the great Aryan king of Persia "modern Iran", king of the world, ... king of the four quarters' declaration concerning the preservation of human rights. The Cyrus Cylinder has now been recognized as the world’s first charter of human rights.?

Cyrus the Great, the patron and deliverer of the Jews, the prophetic declarations of Cyrus the Great in the Bible, acting to restore the nation of Israel from the Babylonian captivity is a big lay.?I have proved that the so-called Cyrus Cylinder and the Inscriptions of Nabonidus (cylinders, bricks, and other text fragments) have entirely nothing to do with Cyrus (Kuraa?), neither with his devil opponent Nabonidus. The texts that have been taken for the word Cyrus (kuraá?) and Nabonidus are corruptions. Nothing is true of the mentioned ridiculous claims about this cylinder (Edict of Cyrus) and his opponent Nabonidus at all.?

Replica of the "Edict of Cyrus" At the United Nations The Government of Iran presented the United Nations with a replica of the "Edict of Cyrus" in a ceremony held in the corridor outside the economic and Social Council Chamber on 14 October 1971. The "Edict of Cyrus” is a declaration made by Cyrus the Great concerning the preservation of human rights in occupied cities after his capture of Babylon in 539 B.C. Cyrus the Great (circa 600 B.C. to 529 B.C.) was the founder of the Persian Empire which, at his death, extended from the Hellespont to the Indies. The replica of the clay tablet on which the cuneiform letters of the “Edict” are inscribed was made by the British Museum from the original which is in its collection. The case in which it is displayed was designed by the Metropolitan Museum Art, New York, and contains English and French translations of the ancient Persian art as well as the replica itself. A view of the replica of the "Edict of Cyrus" on display at UN headquarters. 01 January 1977 United Nations, New York

Cyrus (Kuraá? (ca. 576 – 530 BC) the great Aryan king of Persia "modern Iran", king of the world, mighty king, king of Babylon, king of Sumer and Akkad, king of the four quarters, the son of Cambyses, great king, king of An?an, grandson of Cyrus, the descendant of Teispes; the patron and deliverer of the Jews, the prophetic declarations of Cyrus the Great in the Bible, acting to restore the nation of Israel from Babylonian captivity. A declaration made by Cyrus the Great concerning the preservation of human rights in occupied cities after his capture of Babylon in 539 B.C. He freed the slaves, declared that all people had the right to choose their own religion, and established racial equality, that different races living in the city would be treated equally.?These and other decrees were recorded on a baked-clay cylinder in the Akkadian language with a cuneiform script. The Cyrus Cylinder has now been recognized as the world’s first charter of human rights. It is translated into all six official languages of the United Nations and its provisions parallel the first four Articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The devil opponent of Cyrus was Nabonidus the tyrannical king of Babylon.

That is the well-known story according to the establishment (recognized demonstrations by the world's leading universities and the Bible).

Nothing is true of the mentioned ridiculous claims about Cyrus and his opponent Nabonidus at all. The names Cyrus (Kuraa?) and Nabonidus do not occur in the so-called Cyrus Cylinder and the Inscriptions of Nabonidus.

The text that in Cyrus Cylinder has been taken for the word Cyrus (kuraá?), occurs frequently in Lines 12, 20, 21, 27, 35. From my examination has been clear that the name kuraá? (Cyrus) is a corruption of the word 1-durra? (oneness rolling of').

Compare Cyrus Cylinder L.12, Berai: 1-durraa? (oneness rolling of)

Cyrus Cylinder L.12, Berai: Jegu-1-durti (oneness authority position)

Cyrus Cylinder L.19 - L.20, Berai: ?uána dur 1-durraa? (royalty role of oneness rolling)

Cyrus Cylinder L.21, Berai: dumu dumu 1-durraa? (all last oneness rolling of)

?Cyrus Cylinder L.27, Berai: 1-durraa? (oneness rolling of)

Cyrus Cylinder L.35, Berai: qetát 1-durraa? (oath covenant oneness rolling of).

Compare my decipherment with that of Schaudig 2001: Cyrus Cylinder and Ezida Cylinder of Nabonidus fragments below:

Cyrus Cylinder 1st and 2nd lines, Schaudig, L.1: [....] -ni?u (.... when). L.2: [.... -ki] ibraatim (.... of the four quarters).

Cyrus Cylinder 1st and 2nd lines, Berai, L.1: [.... losed ...] wa ni?u (... with symbol). L.2: [... losed...] uri ráati (... Abrahamic council)?

Cyrus Cylinder L.5, Schaudig: ... uriki ù siittaa-tim ma?aza (for Ur and the rest of the cultic centers)

Cyrus Cylinder L.5, Berai: ... násaruunuki ume-ma?-gur ?e ba?ar-1 dáati bá zát zá (manifestation royal universal principle act one-humanity matriarchy be the essence of nature.

Last lines of Cyrus Cylinder L.44, 45

Cyrus Cylinder, Schaudig, L.44: [.....] -ti (...). L.45: [... ana d]ariati (.... for eternity).

Cyrus Cylinder, Berai, L.44: [... losed ....] 1-ti (... unity). L.45: [.... losed ....] 1-á?áati (.... one-discipleship).

In the decipherment of Cyrus Cylinder, the name Nabonidus is falsely three times depicted, in lines 17, 25 and 33. Compare the depictions by Schaudig to my corrections:

Cyrus Cylinder L.17, Schaudig: Id ná.ni.tuku (Nabonidus).

Cyrus Cylinder L.17, Berai: 1-ága-pá ?ár-raddug (one knowledge-based council-justified-rate).

Cyrus Cylinder L.25, Schaudig: [ding]ir ma ab?áani (who]m he (Nabonidus) imposed)

Cyrus Cylinder L.25, Berai: [... í?] be du ?ááni (... tribe be matriarchy kingship).

Cyrus Cylinder L.33, Schaudig: dingir amar.utu en (whom Nabonidus, to)

Cyrus Cylinder L.33, Berai: í? sar-áten (tribe's main oath).

Nabonidus Ezida Cylinder first and last lines:

Ezida-Cylinder Col.I.1, Schaudig 2001: [.....] -na'iid 1ugal tin.tirki 1ugal tin.tirki ([....] Nabuna'id, der K?nig von B?bil, "Nabonidus king of Babylon")

Ezida-Cylinder Col.I.1, Berai: [....-na] nun-cár (4) 80-ger gá??u din 80-nerki ([... losed ...] 4-establishing 80-officials law call of 80 establishments).

Last line of Ezida-Cylinder Col.II.28, Schaudig: ?uriib amaaat duumqíía (Erua gute Worte für mich ein!) "Erua good words for me"

Last line of Ezida-Cylinder Col.II.28, Berai: ?uri ma?nun ámaá dá-qet du-umkiyia (The joint decision establishing an act of general mother-covenant universal matriarchy.

Almost international humanitarian "modern" legislation terms are known in the cuneiform texts of ca. 5000 years ago, regarding universal matriarchy rabbinic mission "one universal humanity", which have been falsified and disappeared now in nonsensicalness. by the men of God and their universities.

Invitation

In order to be able to continue this research, I need legal assistance, a research grant, and research hosting. This is an independent and unpaid multidisciplinary social sciences and humanities research, with no affiliation to any university that I do intensively since 1994. During this period, I have been forced to rely solely on my own finance with no outside support.?

In my endeavors, I am experiencing that in Western Europe the lawyers are not free to act against governments in matters like this as well as the academic experts are not free to express themselves and official journals are not free to publish this matter.?

I invite universities to stop committing "falsifying historical documents, adapting false educational sources, providing false information, fooling the international community, destruction of the archaeological records of human history and cultural heritage of the humankind, concealing of information on historical ethnic and linguistic development records and records of biological naturalism philosophy and to stop the spending of education budgets and grants on committing such crimes.” The establishments for the entire ancient world are hoaxes.

Join this global innovative and developmental thought and ground-breaking social sciences research that brings the proper knowledge, justice, and peace in the world, which offers the solution to the world’s seemingly unsolvable challenging problems. This research is an alternative perspective and I am open to collaborative research. See the next part

Andrew Jones

Chief Executive Officer at Boneworld

2 年

I visited tge Vatican a few years ago and purchased a faux statue of Romulus and Remus ( clearly pre Catholic symbols) and that was put in a bag that claimed I had purchased a religious relic from the Vatican! As a non-conformist of Christian heritage I find this cavalier approach to language shocking. I am not at all surprised to find that you have identified a number of serious errors in Christian religious thinking. Think about how many cardinals and priests and popes have mislead the public by their public pronouncements in the 20th and 21st CCE over the Nazis atrocities of WW2 and more recently tge misuse of children and single mothers in the care of the Roman Catholic Church. Best wishes and keep up the interesting work. Have you produced books or academic articles I could read?

回复
Andrew Jones

Chief Executive Officer at Boneworld

2 年

I have found your most interesting article underneath the photo you posted. This is a most interesting read and I am most grateful for all the time and effort you have put into this. As I understand it, you are arguing that in very ancient times in the Midfle East, before Christianity was invented, and befor Islam became a religion there was an ancient religion that honoured the female principle. Furthermore you show how the Roman Catholic Church and its scholars gave appropriated other important symbols (pine cones and peacocks) from this essentially Persian culture. There has akso been poor scholarship over symbols found on cylinder seals. This is all very interesting. Although brought up in the Christian tradition in the UK I have had a long interest in the development of religious ideas and would recommend a book called ‘The five stages of Greek religion’ which if my memory serves me well was written by Isiah Berlin. This does not start in the deep prehistory of your wonderful female figurine seed pot, but it does show religious ideas evolved from the 7thCBCE onwards. It does not surprise me to discover that tge RC church had misappropriated older religious ideas and altered their meaning.

回复

What would be the original with which the spurious one is compared?

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

hamiit qliji berai的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了